[Edited Message Follows]
Hello all, Thank you for your inputs.
Let me elaborate my use case. I currently have DPDK router pipeline where
DPDK-APP-A controls intel NICs through DPDK drivers. DPDK-APP-A is also
responsible for routing between multiple physical interfaces(NICs). DPDK-APP-B
is a
Hello all, Thank you for your inputs.
Let me elaborate my use case. I currently have DPDK router pipeline where
DPDK-APP-A controls intel NICs through DPDK drivers. DPDK-APP-A is also
responsible for routing between multiple physical interfaces(NICs). DPDK-APP-B
is a packet inspection
Hello Neale Ranns,
How libmemif is supposed to be used then ? Did you get a chance to look into
use case above ?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#17229): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/17229
Mute This Topic:
[Edited Message Follows]
172.16.16.18 and 172.16.82.247 are IP addresses assigned to vpp physical
interfaces. 172.16.16.17 and 172.16.82.4 are hosts(different machines) attached
to those interfaces. VPP is acting as router. That works perfectly. Now I just
want to let some non-vpp application
172.16.16.18 and 172.16.82.247 are IP addresses assigned to vpp physical
interfaces. 172.16.16.17 and 172.16.82.4 are hosts(different machines) attached
to those interfaces. VPP is acting as router. That works perfectly. Now I just
want to let some non-vpp application to read packets. Hence
[Edited Message Follows]
Got it. Thanks.. in vpp v17 there was no ip table add/del in newer
version it is introduced I guess...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#17201): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/17201
Mute This
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 01:38 AM, Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote:
>
> vppctl ip route add 172.16.82.4/32 via 192.168.1.1 memif0/0 next-hop-table
> 1
It shows following error:
ip route: parse error `via 192.168.1.1 memif0/0 next-...'
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to
Hi ben,
Please find below trace (dpdk-input and memif-input) in application I am
just writing back buffers I received on memif..
00:02:56:971957: dpdk-input
GigabitEthernet4/0/0 rx queue 0
buffer 0x98114: current data 0, length 74, buffer-pool 0, ref-count 1,
totlen-nifb 0, trace handle
Can anyone please check and revert on this config ?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#17214): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/17214
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/76099289/21656
Mute #vpp-memif:
Got it. Thanks
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#17201): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/17201
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/76146302/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe:
Hello Team,
I have two physical NIC attached to vpp-dpdk. vpp throws following error when I
try to create fib table and add interface to it.
set interface ip table GigabitEthernet4/0/0 1 ---> set interface ip table:
no such table 1
"set interface ip table" command should create table for
Hello Ben,
I tried below configuration, Packet rx on physical nic are visible in
application through memif, and they are written-back successfully to memif. but
they are not reaching intended destination.
vppctl create interface memif id 0 master
vppctl set int state memif0/0 up
vppctl set int
[Edited Message Follows]
Thanks.
But I am having trouble figuring out routing or ABF in former case. Once I send
packet back to VPP after processing from my application, how VPP can send it
out on physical interface. I have two physical interfaces. Normally packets
flow between two using link
Thanks.
But I am having trouble figuring out routing or ABF in former case. Once I send
packet back to VPP after processing from my application, how VPP can send it
out on physical interface.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online
Hello Team,
How do I send packets out on a physical interface after I received them through
libmemif in non-vpp application from VPP(DPDK)? Do I need to send them back to
vpp so that VPP can send them out on a physical interface.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to
Thanks Ben,
Got it now. I hope memif is the ONLY right way of sharing packets to non-vpp
applications.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#17153): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/17153
Mute This Topic:
Hello team,
I have a setup where vpp is running with dpdk on two nics. I have added NAT and
other configurations and hence vpp is working as router. I want to integrate my
DPI application hence need to intercept packets. I have looked at libmemif and
its icmp-responder applications. But I was
17 matches
Mail list logo