Ole, so sorry, we are explored network problem in our infrastructure due
testing with parallel connection to PPTP server B and PPTP server C.
So 2nd scheme works well :) Sorry for my mismatch.But hairpining not working in
3rd scheme. I dumped traffic from Machine A, when Machine B trying to
Im dumped traffic from second destination PPTP server, when Machine A connected
to Machine C in 2nd scheme.
So, Machine A with public IP 2.2.2.2 and destination PPTP server (Machine C)
with public IP 5.5.5.5:
IP (tos 0x0, ttl 61, id 15901, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60)
Hi Denis,
Thanks a lot for testing!
> 1st scheme:
> Machine A (inside VPP with 1:1 static mapping) running PPTP _server_.
> Machine B (outside VPP with 1:1 iptables static mapping) running PPTP client.
> This scheme works well.
Splendid.
> 2st scheme:
> Machine A (inside VPP with 1:1 static
Hi, Ole!Today we are testing this patch by following schemes:
1st scheme:
Machine A (inside VPP with 1:1 static mapping) running PPTP _server_.Machine B
(outside VPP with 1:1 iptables static mapping) running PPTP client. This scheme
works well.
2st scheme:Machine A (inside VPP with 1:1 static
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Hi, Ole!Yeah, we are testing SNAT 1:1 static mapping without port
forwarding. Only local and external addressing in
