Re: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment

2021-10-05 Thread aolye
Thank you Ole, will check out it. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20287): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20287 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/84825472/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://l

Re: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment

2021-10-05 Thread Ole Troan
Hi Andy, > Is there an equivalent example of snat > (https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Progressive_VPP_Tutorial#Source_NAT) for > nat44-ei in version 21.x? There is a work in progress patch that adds better NAT documentation here: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/32091 If you have the opportunity to r

Re: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment

2021-10-04 Thread aolye
Thanks Ole, Is there an equivalent example of snat (https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Progressive_VPP_Tutorial#Source_NAT) for nat44-ei in version 21.x ? Best, --Andy -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20284): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment

2021-10-04 Thread Ole Troan
Hi, > Any vpp documents I can find to compare the 3 different NAT vpp provided as > plugins (ED, EI and DET), or you can help to tell here? Can any of them be > combined to use? RFC4787 gives a good description about the differences between ED and EI. And RFC7422 for deterministic NAT. Best re

Re: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment

2021-09-30 Thread andy . ye
Hi Ole, Are these evolutions in the roadmap? Hi Ole and Marcos, Any vpp documents I can find to compare the 3 different NAT vpp provided as plugins (ED, EI and DET), or you can help to tell here? Can any of them be combined to use? Thanks, --Andy -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive al

Re: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment

2021-08-13 Thread Ole Troan
ports in the deterministic pool, fall back to using shared ports. Cheers, Ole > -Mensagem original- > De: mar...@mgiga.com.br > Enviada em: quinta-feira, 12 de agosto de 2021 09:40 > Para: 'Ole Troan' > Cc: 'vpp-dev' > Assunto: RES: [vpp-dev] CGNAT

Re: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment

2021-08-13 Thread Marcos - Mgiga
Hi Ole, Any thoughts ? Best Regards Marcos -Mensagem original- De: mar...@mgiga.com.br Enviada em: quinta-feira, 12 de agosto de 2021 09:40 Para: 'Ole Troan' Cc: 'vpp-dev' Assunto: RES: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment Hello Ole, Thank you for your attention.

Re: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment

2021-08-12 Thread Marcos - Mgiga
d.io Em nome de Ole Troan Enviada em: quarta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2021 18:20 Para: Marcos - Mgiga Cc: vpp-dev Assunto: Re: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment Marcos, > I’m aware that VPP NAT Plugin has a limitation of 1000 ports per inside > users, but eventually that amount of connect

Re: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment

2021-08-11 Thread Ole Troan
Marcos, > I’m aware that VPP NAT Plugin has a limitation of 1000 ports per inside > users, but eventually that amount of connections is not enough. > > I would like to get some guidance on how to change that VPP logic When > assigning ports to users when working with deterministic nat, so users

[vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment

2021-08-11 Thread Marcos - Mgiga
Hello VPP Experts / developers, I'm aware that VPP NAT Plugin has a limitation of 1000 ports per inside users, but eventually that amount of connections is not enough. I would like to get some guidance on how to change that VPP logic When assigning ports to users when working with determini