Thank you Ole, will check out it.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20287): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20287
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/84825472/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://l
Hi Andy,
> Is there an equivalent example of snat
> (https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Progressive_VPP_Tutorial#Source_NAT) for
> nat44-ei in version 21.x?
There is a work in progress patch that adds better NAT documentation here:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/32091
If you have the opportunity to r
Thanks Ole,
Is there an equivalent example of snat
(https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Progressive_VPP_Tutorial#Source_NAT) for nat44-ei
in version 21.x ?
Best,
--Andy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20284): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev
Hi,
> Any vpp documents I can find to compare the 3 different NAT vpp provided as
> plugins (ED, EI and DET), or you can help to tell here? Can any of them be
> combined to use?
RFC4787 gives a good description about the differences between ED and EI.
And RFC7422 for deterministic NAT.
Best re
Hi Ole,
Are these evolutions in the roadmap?
Hi Ole and Marcos,
Any vpp documents I can find to compare the 3 different NAT vpp provided as
plugins (ED, EI and DET), or you can help to tell here? Can any of them be
combined to use?
Thanks,
--Andy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive al
ports in the deterministic
pool, fall back
to using shared ports.
Cheers,
Ole
> -Mensagem original-
> De: mar...@mgiga.com.br
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 12 de agosto de 2021 09:40
> Para: 'Ole Troan'
> Cc: 'vpp-dev'
> Assunto: RES: [vpp-dev] CGNAT
Hi Ole,
Any thoughts ?
Best Regards
Marcos
-Mensagem original-
De: mar...@mgiga.com.br
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 12 de agosto de 2021 09:40
Para: 'Ole Troan'
Cc: 'vpp-dev'
Assunto: RES: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment
Hello Ole,
Thank you for your attention.
d.io Em nome de Ole Troan
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2021 18:20
Para: Marcos - Mgiga
Cc: vpp-dev
Assunto: Re: [vpp-dev] CGNAT port assignment
Marcos,
> I’m aware that VPP NAT Plugin has a limitation of 1000 ports per inside
> users, but eventually that amount of connect
Marcos,
> I’m aware that VPP NAT Plugin has a limitation of 1000 ports per inside
> users, but eventually that amount of connections is not enough.
>
> I would like to get some guidance on how to change that VPP logic When
> assigning ports to users when working with deterministic nat, so users
Hello VPP Experts / developers,
I'm aware that VPP NAT Plugin has a limitation of 1000 ports per inside
users, but eventually that amount of connections is not enough.
I would like to get some guidance on how to change that VPP logic When
assigning ports to users when working with determini
10 matches
Mail list logo