Hi vpp-dev,
I’m looking at the ip-rewrite node, and I think it might be a bug at:
vnet_rewrite_one_header (adj0[0], ip0, sizeof (ethernet_header_t));
The adj-> rewrite_header.data_bytes might be 0 when it comes to tunnel
interface, f.g., gtpu, ipsec. Thus, at least 8 bytes garbage are written t
it
would be a Good Thing...
D.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Kingwel Xie
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 4:40 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] ip-rewrite bug?
Hi vpp-dev,
I’m looking at the ip-rewrite node, and I think it might be a bug at:
vnet_rewrite_one_header (adj0[0
On Behalf Of Kingwel Xie
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 4:40 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: [vpp-dev] ip-rewrite bug?
Hi vpp-dev,
I’m looking at the ip-rewrite node, and I think it might be a bug at:
vnet_rewrite_one_header (adj0[0], ip0, sizeof (ethernet_he
Barach
> via Lists.Fd.Io
> Sent: mardi 5 mars 2019 13:25
> To: Kingwel Xie ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] ip-rewrite bug?
>
> Let’s try to fix the underlying code in vnet_rewrite_one_header, and
> friends. The code already checks f
