might be able to help with testing, since I've
finally moved to OpenWRT, and have a SixXS tunnel/subnet
idling for a year now.
P.S. Preparing to drive out another couple of
VServer-hosting boxes to the rack tomorrow. Kudos
to all you people who made it possible.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://
multi-user systems.'
Savochkin is now focused on getting OpenVZ merged into the mainline
Linux kernel."
References
1. http://kerneltrap.org/node/6492
- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org"
mp-vs
or a similiar vs version of an AMD64 kernel?
Thanks much.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 7
uot;).
I've had this annoying message get away when I apt-get install locales
and defined a suitable iso one (notice: utf-8 is not enough!).
>
> I know that I must export
> LC_ALL=C
> LC_MESSAGES=C
> LS_TYPE=C
> LANGUAGE=C
> LANG
e=36.7 ms
...ah, it's the Tyan IPMI module. It's colliding with the
10.0.0.7 address. I've set eth1 to a different address,
and now all is working.
Thanks again!
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
_
> then, in terms of (quasi) physical security.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 244
md64-smp-vs). The paths don't seem to be matching online
documentation very well, for whatever reason. Having all the files
in one location would be a really nice-to-have.
> best,
> Herbert
>
> PS: double check the rsync options and don't forget
> to use --numeric-ids
amage been done already.
Is there a simple way to land in stable amd64 land?
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B0
server applied )
>
> I ve done this for i386 2.6.12 kernel - you can try for your one.
> It is not very good to make kernels with reduced ammount of drivers - because
> they will not be portable across different hardware.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leit
Can I run BIND9 in a vserver? If yes, is there something I
need to be aware of? (One of my nameservers died, so I'm
considering virtualizing DNS).
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07
Setting up openvpn (2.0-1sarge3) ...
/bin/mknod: `/dev/net/tun': Operation not permitted
I can't have an OpenVPN tunnel terminate in a vserver,
can I?
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
___
vices - there's some
> information about OpenVPN in Vservers in the following page, maybe that
> helps:
> http://linux-vserver.org/some_hints_from_john (Search for openvpn in
> that page)
Thanks, Baltasar. Followed the procedure, but can't get a pingable
IP. /etc/openvpn/openv
I've seen a system load of about 500 today, while the system still
remained reasonably responsible. The reason was a local nessus
scan, on a /24 network, on reasonably meagre hardware
(Athlon XP, 1.2 GHz).
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl htt
Virtualisierung auf
Betriebssystemebene läuft zwar jede virtuelle Umgebung isoliert, alle nutzen
aber gemeinsam den Kernel des Hostsystems, was vor allem zu einem
Geschwindigkeitsvorteil führen soll. Damit wird jedoch auch nur Linux als
Gastsystem unterstützt.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org"
build --force -n v${IP} --hostname v${IP}.ativel.com --context
${IP} --interface eth0:85.10.225.${IP}/24 -m debootstrap -- -d sarge -m
http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/
...but I'd rather have 32 bit Debian Sarge guest on my hands.
(The host is a Debian AMD64).
--
Eugen* Leitl htt
ditionnal packages.
> They will all have a public ip - no firewall.
Is this SIP? Asterisk?
> Considering that all the servers are idle - how many of them can a
> regular server (Pentium 3.0Ghz - 2go ram) handle ?
How much would fit into a 4 GByte 2 GHz Opteron system?
--
Eugen* Leitl http:/
/vservers/ is there anything else I should synch?
Another question: Debian 4.0 is ante portas. Given that 3.1 had everything
way out of date, can one rely on stock vserver kernel and tools in Debian 4.0?
Thanks.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://l
ould post it here, that would be rather useful.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
at's a nice addition to
smartmontools and mdadm email notification.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3
indles, RAM, and/or more nodes.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
signature.asc
D
7;t done any VServers there yet).
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
signa
I would like to package asterisk on some vserver products.
Are there any gotchas with asterisk in vserver guests?
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.
hey're using loopback filesystem (LOFS)
to minimize space for shared resources. I'm not sure why they chose
that way, and didn't go for simple symlinks.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
_
d. Thanks nevertheless!
Speaking of which, while Xen is moving towards being included in the main
kernel, is there any chance VServer patch ever will?
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl
__
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144http:
mory for a couple of servers, to run
VServers. What's the memory footprint of a typical VServer (running, let's
say, postfix/apache/openvpn)? 100 MBytes, twice that? I just need rough
numbers, to see how much I have buy (1 GByte modules are expensive still).
--
Eugen* Leitl http
Dennis, you're still sending HTML-only.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 02:16:42PM +0200, Dennis Paulisch wrote:
> ___
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
--
h packages in future for
diverse K7/C3/AMD64 kernels, as I need those for work.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 24
Tools to manage debian virtual servers
and
util-vserver - tools for Virtual private servers and context switching.
Is it safe to install both on Debian Sarge?
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820
don't find it difficult to manipulate well in excess of 100 k messages.
The database is of primary value in case the original effort goes away,
or data is destroyed by a disk crash with no backup (happens regularly).
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl
Given news like http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/65815
I'd be interested in an informal comparison of Solaris zones
and VServer.
I have not yet personally used either, but I'd be interested
in a comparison.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.o
According to Golem http://golem.de/0511/41679.html
lustre 1.4.5 is out.
http://www.clusterfs.com/download.html
Future release cycles (December 2005) will purportedly
be released to the paying customers and the great unwashed
simultaneously.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";&
ge is VServers in a hosting setting.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
signature.as
://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200511/0189.html
Regards,
Kir, OpenVZ project leader
Eugen Leitl wrote:
>Before I try OpenVZ I would like to hear comments of people
>who've ran both VServer and OpenVZ, preferrably on the same
>hardware, on how both compare.
>
>Factors
e being, OpenSolaris/Express Community
Edition is far too bleeding edge. bonnie++ so far gives about
the same values on Solaris Express and Centos. I'll do the
same for Debian, once md0 is done resyncing. OpenVZ seems
to play well with CentOS so far -- haven't tested any vservers
yet, t
er code in the main tree?
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
signature.asc
Descript
n Linux is timely, said Pund-IT
analyst Charles King."
References
1. http://news.com.com/2102-1016_3-6027219.html?tag=st.util.print
- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
signature.asc
Description: Digital s
rning: no entropy for TLS key
generation: disabling TLS support
on a vserver?
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B0
to the standard locale ("C").
Restarting OpenBSD Secure Shell server: sshd.
Setting up ssh (4.2p1-5) ...
# apt-get install locales
# vi /etc/locale.gen
# locale-gen
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
chine
(only 4 GBytes, though -- should I then just stick with vanilla 32 bit
Debian, or does this result in a noticeable performance hit on
146 Opterons?), so if anyone has a working vserver-patched amd64 kernel
package I would very much like a copy (Markus, are you there?).
--
Eugen* Leitl
which they deny they do).
> In general the support boards of the german providers are
> german-speaking, so you should think twice to host there if you don't
> know the language.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
.e.
will it hurt performance badly? 2 GByte/process limit won't bite, will absence
of
twice as many registers in AMD64 mode? But gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4 doesn't support
AMD64 all that well anyway, right?
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
_
scheduling, MMX, SSE, SSE2 support) than debian's i386 packages
> (ie -mtune=i486), but i'll leave that trouble to gentoo users. ;-)
I am considering recompiling a few packages, once gcc-4.x.x is available
for Sarge. But for time being, I'd be glad just having a stable running
? Will it reliably prevent e.g. postfix in a guest binding
to all addresses?
Thanks,
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78B
44 matches
Mail list logo