Re: [Vserver] kill: (1) - No such process

2005-04-22 Thread Liam Helmer
Hmm... this command works for me with fakeinit on although, it should really be calling "init q", but that's just me being picky. You did restart the vserver after adding the flag, yes? Enter the vserver and check if there's a process called "init" with a pid of 1 (use ps xa). You are using

Re: [Vserver] Slightly OT: problems with emerge -b on gentoo

2005-01-02 Thread Liam Helmer
Actually, this is very OT... I'd search the gentoo forums, and you'll probably find this question 20 times. try adding "buildpkg" to FEATURES= in /etc/make.conf the packages are created at /usr/portage/packages On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 20:51 +0100, Oliver Welter wrote: > Hi Folks > > I am running

Re: [Vserver] gateway in vserver

2004-12-30 Thread Liam Helmer
t routing via eth1. I the other machines have no > eth1 access, you need to alter their outgoing IP via SNAT. > Might ofc be wrong, but then someone will reply and I will get it > right myself, too ;) > > Regards, > Adrian -- Liam Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Vserver] Syslog and vserver

2004-12-29 Thread Liam Helmer
if this matters > > > > THX > > > > Oliver > > -- > > Diese Nachricht wurde digital unterschrieben > > oliwel's public key: http://www.oliwel.de/oliwel.crt > > Basiszertifikat: http://www.ldv.ei.tum.de/page72 > > best, > Herbe

Re: [Vserver] Syslog and vserver

2004-12-28 Thread Liam Helmer
slog-ng if this matters > > THX > > Oliver > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver -- Liam Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Vse

[Vserver] StrongBox Linux Release 1.0 Beta-12

2004-12-22 Thread Liam Helmer
ckstart.php If this interests you, or you want to know more, email me at: liam at strongboxlinux.com Cheers, Liam -- StrongBox Linux http://www.strongboxlinux.com "Making Security Friendly" -- Liam Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ V

Re: [Vserver] apt-get and vserver problem

2004-12-21 Thread Liam Helmer
STROUTING -o ppp0 -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d ! > 192.168.1.0/24 -j SNAT --to-source > next enter in my vserver: > apt-get update > 0% [Connecting to ftp2.it.debian.org (213.156.32.111)] > 0% [Connecting to ftp2.it.debian.org (213.156.32.111)

Re: [Vserver] apt-get and vserver problem

2004-12-20 Thread Liam Helmer
Correction: -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -i ppp0 won't work, sorry. Cheers, Liam On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 09:28 -0800, Liam Helmer wrote: > On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 12:28 +0100, Vincenzo Agosto wrote: > > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > IP=`ifconfig ppp0 | grep inet | cut -d:

Re: [Vserver] X server and /dev/mem

2004-12-20 Thread Liam Helmer
Here's my BCapabilities -> I've been running X inside a vserver for quite some time. This is what I use. CAP_CHOWN CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH -> needed for X CAP_FOWNER CAP_FSETID CAP_KILL CAP_SETGID CAP_SETUID CAP_SETPCAP -> I use this for ethereal CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE CAP_NET_BROADCAST CAP_NET_RAW C

Re: [Vserver] apt-get and vserver problem

2004-12-20 Thread Liam Helmer
On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 12:28 +0100, Vincenzo Agosto wrote: > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > IP=`ifconfig ppp0 | grep inet | cut -d: -f2 | awk {'print $1'}` > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d ! 192.168.1.0/24 -j > SNAT --to-source $IP > same problem :( Wanna try quoting a little less me

Re: [Vserver] apt-get and vserver problem

2004-12-19 Thread Liam Helmer
s > Darryl > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFBwi5Z/XQ6DbmPjokRAropAKCBCKaOln50pIH7N/TLxZFQ1X3iLgCfWW3o > haj3s4BwGrgaivi9se3qhfI= > =R7XN > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > ___

Re: [Vserver] Next Generation Networking ...

2004-12-08 Thread Liam Helmer
SD. In Window, the newly > created "Bridge" gets a mac address and dishes the data to the right > network card some how. > > Would either of these two things have any bearing? -- Liam Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Re: [Vserver] StrongBox Linux

2004-11-02 Thread Liam Helmer
ch is an deal I'm working on with a company that does Content Management Systems, http://www.thesmallbox.com (which, incidentally, is a cool product and has an online demo). Cheers, Liam On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 09:18 -0800, R. Dale Thomas wrote: > Liam Helmer wrote: > [snip] > &

[Vserver] StrongBox Linux

2004-11-01 Thread Liam Helmer
Hey y'all, I've mentioned this before, but, now that I've finally got my new site up, I'll put in a proper plug. I've been building a linux distribution over the last year that is based on linux-vserver, called StrongBox linux. It's based around gentoo and debian, running kernel 2.6.8.1. The basi

Re: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.8.1 and Vserver 1.92

2004-10-22 Thread Liam Helmer
d# ./vservers-legacy status > > > > > ONBOOT=yes Server germanium is not running > > > > > > > > > > I can't seem to start the vserver. > > > > > > > > Hm, seems your debootstrap run wasn't completed successfully. > > > > debootstrap uses a fake start-stop-daemon to prevent the newly installed > > > > services from interfering with the currently running services. IIRC it > > > > should automatically be replaced with the real start-stop-daemon when > > > > debootstrap finishes. > > > > > > > > HTH > > > > Bjoern > > > > > > > ___ > > > > > > > Vserver mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > > > ___ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > -- Liam Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Re: [Vserver] Replication

2004-10-20 Thread Liam Helmer
> ___ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver -- Liam Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Re: [Vserver] COW links

2004-10-15 Thread Liam Helmer
lus, you can easily implement change control systems that allow you to log _all_ changes that are made to a server. And you don't have to spend every night running checksums on all your binaries to see if someone's broken into your system yet... If you're man

Re: [Vserver] COW links

2004-10-14 Thread Liam Helmer
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 20:50 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote: > The only problem is that cowlinks are symmetric. There is no natural > way to tell the "original" from the "copy". It's up to the user to > declare 2.6.8 the "original" and 2.6.9-rc3-bk8 the "copy". This is one thing that I live about Union

Re: [Vserver] COW links

2004-10-13 Thread Liam Helmer
; to be regular files. > > o A new syscall should be introduced to retrieve the inode number of > the underlying inode (eg I1 in the example). Diff needs to use this > system call so it's optimization for hard links works with cowlinks > as well.

Re: [Vserver] postfix, no route to host

2004-10-12 Thread Liam Helmer
Sorry, I missed some of the message ;) > This directory does not exist. In fact /etc/iproute2 doesn't. Does this > indicate whether iproute2 is installed or just not used in this manner. > > > 200 vserver > > I'm assuming vserver is a label so with my naming convertion it would be > >

Re: [Vserver] postfix, no route to host

2004-10-12 Thread Liam Helmer
of this year > addressing this same issue. >Do you think it may be part of Fedora Core 1? Rpm reports a > iproute-2.4.7-11. Is there another way to test whether this is a > Redhat/Fedora naming convention or the real thing -- 2? > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Liam Helmer wrote: &

Re: [Vserver] postfix, no route to host

2004-10-12 Thread Liam Helmer
N) routes and I forgot to look at this logs since it > appeared this was working (secondary MX) until we got flooded with > junkmail this week-end which seems to have overloaded the primary MX (a > stand alone system). Nothing like a load test to get the smoke f

Re: [Vserver] Sudo in a vserver

2004-10-07 Thread Liam Helmer
It's funny... I'd sent that a week ago, and it didn't show up on the list, but I managed to answer my own question anyways. Ah, the reliability of email ;) Cheers, Liam On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 18:25 +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote: > On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:00:27 -0700 > Liam Hel

Re: [Vserver] problems with apache and php in a vserver

2004-10-05 Thread Liam Helmer
gt; > Eric > > > > ___ > > Vserver mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > ___ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > -- Liam Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Re: [Vserver] memory allocation trouble in 2.6

2004-10-05 Thread Liam Helmer
system :) Or just see the 2G/2G option I > already seen discussed in linux kernel mailing lists... > And posting in linux kernel mailing list. > > Thanks for your response... > > Oh, btw, You may be interrested by the fact we have now more than 100 > vservers deployed... T

Re: [Vserver] NFS Server within VServer

2004-08-12 Thread Liam Helmer
I have made a patch to allow you to use a vserver within a virtual context but without a chbind, updated for the new vserver utils. I can post it up if you like. But, either way, your ideal is probably not running a service that uses direct kernel access (like nfsd) within a vserver. You might wan

Re: [Vserver] ebuild for alpha util-vserver 0.29.214

2004-07-28 Thread Liam Helmer
... which is at bugs.gentoo.org. Wanna send a copy my way as well? Or a link to the bugs.gentoo.org entry if you do that? Cheers, Liam On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 16:48, Georges Toth wrote: > hi, > > could you please make a bugtracker entry on gentoo.org for that ebuild for it > to be included in the

Re: [Vserver] Putting a Main Server in a Vserver

2004-07-22 Thread Liam Helmer
>From the list archives: 1 vserver copied to another thread... This looks pretty complete, and it's designed for copying 1 live server to a new server. Cheers, Liam -Forwarded Message- > From: Joel Vandal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Vserver] rsyncing vserv

Re: [Vserver] vserver & ckrm integration

2004-07-22 Thread Liam Helmer
Well, the vserver mailing list works... but a number of people have been having some issues with the subscribe/unsubscribe mechanism. I'm not sure what the current status of that is. As to your project: wow, looks really neat. It looks to me like a good fit with vserver, as it adds a lot to vserve

Re: [Vserver] Squashfs bug

2004-07-12 Thread Liam Helmer
Yup. The patch we did on IRC is working like a charm. Incidentally, the squashfs maintainer pointed to the XID tagging issues as well, saying that that was likely it. Cheers, Liam On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 23:19, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 07:58:07PM +0000, Liam Helmer wr

Re: [Vserver] The simple logos were the best...

2004-07-12 Thread Liam Helmer
I guess you could have a picture of a penguin in a whole bunch of pieces... Or sliced penguin ;) But, that's getting morbid... Cheers, Liam On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 21:49, Christian Jaeger wrote: > At 21:36 Uhr + 12.07.2004, Liam Helmer wrote: > >I think I liked the first one bes

[Vserver] The simple logos were the best...

2004-07-12 Thread Liam Helmer
I think I liked the first one best. But, either of the first 2 are fine. Also, my g/f thought they were cute. And, hey, that's what a logo's about, isn't it? Cheers, Liam On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 20:36, Matthew Nuzum wrote: > I liked 2 and 4 best. Logo 4 had a little more of a "corp" feel which ma

[Vserver] Squashfs bug

2004-07-12 Thread Liam Helmer
Hey Herbert, We chatted a bit about this on IRC, but I wanted to try and get this resolved, so I'll make a more thorough report on the matter: I'm using kernel 2.6.7 with vserver 1.9.2-rc5. The problem I'm running into is with the squashfs file system (http://squashfs.sf.net). This bug affects bo

[Vserver] vserver 2.6.6 hanging bug

2004-06-25 Thread Liam Helmer
I'm getting kernel errors and a system hang using the new tools. Configuration: kernel 2.6.6 with vserver 1.9.1 util-vserver 0.2.9-214 filesystems: mostly reiserfs and tmpfs. Using lvm-2 and device-mapper. devfs: no result: eventual system hang, all cpu being used up by ksoftirq, reboot won't work

Re: [Vserver] Alpha vserver tools (0.29.294) OPTION_INSECURE

2004-06-17 Thread Liam Helmer
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 00:27, Enrico Scholz wrote: > http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~ensc/util-vserver/doc/conf/configuration.html > > or at > > http://www.linux-vserver.org/index.php?page=alpha+util-vserver Thanks Enrico, Nice, backdrop ;-) l8r Liam ___

Re: [Vserver] Alpha vserver tools (0.29.294) OPTION_INSECURE

2004-06-17 Thread Liam Helmer
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 09:29, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:10:32PM +0000, Liam Helmer wrote: > hmm, well, !--secure is _very_ insecure, maybe it would > be a better approach to add the CAPs one by one, to > find a minimal set of CAPs for your 'special' us

[Vserver] Alpha vserver tools (0.29.294) OPTION_INSECURE

2004-06-16 Thread Liam Helmer
I've been playing with the alpha vserver tools, and I'm trying to figure out how to expand a vservers capabilities. I hacked the previous version to not pass the --secure flag with a certain commandline option, so that I could do things like run X-Windows or similar applications. I found a referenc

Re: [Vserver] Capability "suid" ?

2004-05-13 Thread Liam Helmer
I think that you're honestly better off creating some kind of pipe or socket where the commands come through, which has a list of functions that it can provide. That way you can have a list, and see if there's a match for what's sent. It'd really be quite hard to implement a SUID type of arrangeme

Re: [Vserver] traceroute issues

2004-05-12 Thread Liam Helmer
> On a side note, we are working on a php/ldap based vserver configuration > management tool, as the only tool I am aware of is still unavailable... > > If anyone is interested, I'd be willing to put it online somewhere... > Contact me off-list about this. Sounds cool... I'd be into possibly help

Re: [Vserver] traceroute issues

2004-05-12 Thread Liam Helmer
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 17:31, Dennis Roos wrote: > Hi, > Here's the problem: > Users inside the vserver are unable to traceroute (ping works fine, due > to the CAP_NET_RAW)... traceroute complains about the (source) > interface, like so: > root # traceroute -n www.google.nl > traceroute: findsaddr:

Re: [Vserver] Bind9-problem, -u not supported

2004-05-11 Thread Liam Helmer
I think that this is because bind9 uses linux-capabilities to do it's change to a particular user -> thus, when capabilities aren't present in the compilation, no user switch is possible. That's been my take on it at least. I'm in the process of switching my sites to pdns anyways though -> which r

Re: [Vserver] Strange INSTALL option

2004-05-10 Thread Liam Helmer
I'm not sure it will be THAT big a deal. Most of the upgrades to software are required specifically for things like e2fs utils, etc -> things that require access to the kernel syscalls. I remember running redhat 6.2 with kernel 2.4pre1 (back in the day), and there was very little I needed to do to

Re: [Vserver] vserver service command

2004-05-07 Thread Liam Helmer
> I don't like this keystroke saving sugar, vserver should just have the > 'exec' option and nothing else, even the 'enter' command is not that > necessary IMHO :-) > Well, you don't have to use it ;) If it saves me 10 minutes (in total) out of my day, that's a good thing. But, if you really want

Re: [Vserver] Connections from virtual server appearing as if from host

2004-04-29 Thread Liam Helmer
> > Enforcing routing of outgoing packets to always use the vservers's > > source IP(s) > this is something which will be solved by the next > step when I clean up the network implementation of > vserver (and should already work partially), so I > think this should not require special rules ... No

Re: [Vserver] Connections from virtual server appearing as if from host

2004-04-29 Thread Liam Helmer
> hmm, I do not see a problem with implementing a > netfilter for xid (on outgoing packets), if you > (or somebody else) volunteers to do the userspace > part (for netfilter) to configure it ... I'm up for it. We'd have to all decide on what people want it to do, exactly, but that's cool. Somethin

Re: [Vserver] Connections from virtual server appearing as if from host

2004-04-28 Thread Liam Helmer
's an intervening router. I'm not 100% sure it'll catch the packets correctly though, but it might be worth a shot. Cheers, Liam On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 18:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Liam Helmer wrote: > > Did you check those to make sure that packets coming from >

Re: [Vserver] Connections from virtual server appearing as if from host

2004-04-28 Thread Liam Helmer
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 16:55, Alex Lyashkov wrote: > В Срд, 28.04.2004, в 19:45, Liam Helmer пишет: > > This question came up on the list a week or two ago, and the answer was > > that IPtables rules were changing the source address of outgoing > > connections. Did you check th

Re: [Vserver] Connections from virtual server appearing as if from host

2004-04-28 Thread Liam Helmer
This question came up on the list a week or two ago, and the answer was that IPtables rules were changing the source address of outgoing connections. Did you check those to make sure that packets coming from your vserver addresses aren't being SNAT-ed to something? Just thought I'd check. Cheers,

Re: [Vserver] Question

2004-04-23 Thread Liam Helmer
I'm not sure what the question is here, but I currently use Plesk inside a vserver without any issues on one of my client's boxes. The only weirdness for me was having to make sure that my ip addresses were added to the box using ifconfig, not iproute -> I'm using an old version of plesk that uses

Re: [Vserver] Networking between vservers

2004-04-21 Thread Liam Helmer
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 19:07, Micah Anderson wrote: > You may have missed the section below where I include the > vservers/.conf file which shows clearly that the private IP is > in the IPROOT= variable, and this still doesn't work. > > micah > > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Liam

Re: [Vserver] Networking between vservers

2004-04-21 Thread Liam Helmer
To make it communicate using a private IP would involved adding that private ip to it's IPROOT= variable in the vservsers/.conf file. However, you're probably much better off adding permissions to the mysql server so that that the external IP can connect, and not changing the vserver config at all.

Re: [Vserver] util-vserver -- future directions

2004-04-08 Thread Liam Helmer
this mean you're thinking about doing this, in your copious spare time? ;) Cheers, Liam On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 23:34, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:51:05PM +0000, Liam Helmer wrote: > > Intruiging, I managed to miss that one. > > I tried it out, in case

Re: [Vserver] util-vserver -- future directions

2004-04-08 Thread Liam Helmer
onto it... ;) Other than directory unlinking stuff, it works quite well. No crashes yet. The interface (via sysctl) is a little odd, but it seems to work OK. Cheers, Liam On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 14:43, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: > On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Liam Helmer wrote: > > > I a

Re: [Vserver] util-vserver -- future directions

2004-04-07 Thread Liam Helmer
I went on a different tack with all this: I wanted to use read only disk images for vservers, and then have a set of configuration files that are shared between the vservers. This still lets you do updates to some degree with file binds and the like, but completely locks down the ability of the vse

Re: [Vserver] Dummy device creation without race states

2004-03-30 Thread Liam Helmer
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 05:11, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 01:41:14AM +, Liam Helmer wrote: printf "%s:%02x" eth0 12345 Ooh, cool. That's much nicer. So, after fixing a couple of other bugs too, it should look more like this: vstohex () {  

[Vserver] Dummy device creation without race states

2004-03-30 Thread Liam Helmer
The creation of the dummy devices is ugly and has races ('dummy0' is used by every 'vserver ... start' instance which conflicts with the parallel vserver startup). 'dummy' would be ideally but is not supported by the kernel. I've attached what I was thinking, roughly. Yes, this is part of a

Re: [Vserver] [RFC] Future Linux-Vserver Networking (Part 1)

2004-03-30 Thread Liam Helmer
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:27, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Ok, I implemented the first part of your suggestion into util-vserver[1]; > for the second one (iptables), I am not sure how to realize it (especially > the removal of the rules). I'll work on that one, 'cause it would be useful for me... I'll se

Re: [Vserver] [RFC] Future Linux-Vserver Networking (Part 1)

2004-03-30 Thread Liam Helmer
Here's a bunch of thoughts on networking in linux-vserver. The nice thing about the current linux-vserver interface is that it's efficient. The packet only has to travel once through the network stack, which makes it faster, especially when packets have to be rebuilt from fragments. The bad thing

Re: [Vserver] iptables POM extras repository

2004-03-30 Thread Liam Helmer
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 09:51, Dariush Pietrzak wrote: > > > http://strongboxlinux.com/files/linux-2.4.25sbl1/ > > > > > > vserver+POM+supermount+evfs+freeswan+a few other things > > > > Wow. Super patchset! For those of us slightly Linux challenged will a > yup, and broken systrace on top. Very

Re: [Vserver] iptables POM extras repository

2004-03-29 Thread Liam Helmer
Works no problem. You can use my patchset if you're running 2.4.25: http://strongboxlinux.com/files/linux-2.4.25sbl1/ vserver+POM+supermount+evfs+freeswan+a few other things Cheers, Liam On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 17:58, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: > Has anyone applied the IPTables POM patches from

Re: [Vserver] administrative 'host', X on vserver?

2004-03-08 Thread Liam Helmer
Yes, it works fine -> but you have to fine-tune the permissions a lot -> it ends up requiring most of the admin permissions, /dev/kmem, etc... It still makes sense for some applications -> having a separate filesystem namespace and/or ip space for a desktop can be a great boon for zero administrat

Re: [Vserver] future 2.6 development ...

2004-01-30 Thread Liam Helmer
It sounds to me like there's definitely interest. The thing is, you haven't told anyone what freevps really does at this point. Virtually nobody on this list, I imagine, is running that version of redhat and that kernel. And, if they are, they're looking to upgrade, because it's very hard to secure

Re: [Vserver] future 2.6 development ...

2004-01-29 Thread Liam Helmer
I personally use Gentoo for the vast majority of my work, so a redhat specific patchset isn't that useful to me. I noticed FreeVPS when I was looking around, but the fact that it's so distribution-specific caused me to pass it by without much more than a second glance. (Like most linux geeks, I'm e

Re: [Vserver] future 2.6 development ...

2004-01-29 Thread Liam Helmer
I like option a; I think that using the LSM framework is the best way to go, and ensures that you have a whole lot less work in the future -> instead of patching in a vserver framework, instead you have a more established API that will be less of a moving target to develop against. It also makes it

Re: [Vserver] socket.c and apache issues inside a vserver - apache issue solved

2004-01-22 Thread Liam Helmer
ce] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... [Fri Jan 23 00:43:17 2004] [notice] Digest: done OK... I just have to get it more random data -> that, I can deal with! Cheers, Liam On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 15:28, Liam Helmer wrote: > Hey guys, > > I've been working wi

[Vserver] socket.c and apache issues inside a vserver

2004-01-22 Thread Liam Helmer
Hey guys, I've been working with linux vservers inside my distribution (http://desktopappliances.org). I'm currently playing with a web server module running in a vserver. However, I have 2 bugs that are cropping up, and I'm trying to identify and correct them. First off, the obligatory setup inf

Re: [Vserver] XFree86?

2003-12-19 Thread Liam Helmer
hich is, naturally, a big security hole. It also seems to create a device for it's graphics card on startup, which may be an issue. Cheers, Liam On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 12:04, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:14:47AM -0800, Liam Helmer wrote: > > Anyone a

Re: [Vserver] Merging linux-vserver with ck + grsecurity kernel -> suggestions anyone?

2003-12-19 Thread Liam Helmer
Awsome! I look forward to testing it out for you. Well, I won't worry about it too much then -> I'm sure you're way more qualified at this than I am . l8r, Liam On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 12:03, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > I'm working on a port to ck1, and I guess it will > be available soon for vs1.3.x

[Vserver] XFree86?

2003-12-19 Thread Liam Helmer
Anyone attempted getting XFree86 working inside a vserver? Anyone succeeded? I can't see why this shouldn't work, so I'm curious if it's been tried. l8r, Liam ___ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vser

[Vserver] Merging linux-vserver with ck + grsecurity kernel -> suggestions anyone?

2003-12-19 Thread Liam Helmer
I've been working on getting the linux-vservers patch working with a ck + grsecurity patched kernel (maintained on this site: http://www.plumlocosoft.com/kernel/). The CK patchset is a set of patches for preemption, a new kernel scheduler (I believe a backport of some of the stuff in 2.6, plus oth