-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
> Micah Anderson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
>>
>>>> Package: util-vserver
>>>> Version: 0.30.210-10
>>>> Severity: normal
>>>>
depends flag that Herbert mentions is useful only
when a vserver is a pre-requisite for another to start. However, if you need
a vserver to start that is a pre-requisite for the rest of the system bootup
process, then this flag is not what you want.
[snip tons of extra information]
Micah
_
you a possible solution to that problem.
> Of course, that does not mean you received it.
If this was a solution to Joel's problem with dietlib, can you re-send
it to the list so the rest of us can know the answer? I'd like to be
able to reference it in the future if other H
In gmane.linux.vserver, you wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
>> >&
lts of tests?
> PS: I hope that dietlibc on hppa will be fixed soon.
Have the issues on HPPA been brought to the dietlibc developers?
micah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD4l2h9n4qXRzy1ioRAsKMAKCv8YQr/D/9YQDQc/XOAQO/pJwe2wCggmD+
sRKaer
ose a new (and
therefore reference-free) message when changing topics.
Joel Soete wrote:
> Hello Micah,
>
> I just read the changelog of your debian's pkg upload (util-vserver
> (0.30.209-2) unstable) and btw discover:
> o it was re-enable for hppa ;-)
> o and i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:40:29PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
>
> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
>>>Btw may I ask you to add this -n (i.e. no_color option) to testme.
>>>That would look like:
>
-n (no_color) option was added after I sent a similar
patch back in October[1]?
Micah
1. http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg10918.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD4QCd9n4qXRzy1ioRAtNAAJwJierglR+/ufpIpIUDaOsfQltKugCfVG0t
1x55Xg0BgliW2
's Office 97
or something."
Micah
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 03:29:39PM +0100, Joep Gommers wrote:
>
>>Hi folks,
>>
>>The webpage with all discussed logo's can be found here:
>>http://www.virtualinfrastructure.nl/personal/vserver
vailable, of course.
My only comments on this logo is that the repeated checkmarks look too
much like the Nike logo, especially the red one, which they used
specifically. I have no doubts that a megacorporation like Nike would
find offense with this logo as it is now and would write threate
> OPINION POLL
>
>
> please check (X) all points which apply ...
> (according to your opinion)
>
> [ ] I had no idea about this issue/deficiency
> [x] I did already know about it
>
> [ ] I'm already using BME (or similar) patches
> [ ] I will start using BME patches now
>
but I dropped it from my kernels during the
> > recent debugging frenzy and I'm a bit reluctant to apply it again - a
> > bit too intrusive for my taste and I don't know whether it's SMP-safe
> > really. If anybody is interested, feel free to drop me a note.
It wo
is at, it will just be left up to
chance. Filing a bug in the tracker will keep the issue around until it
is dealt with.
Micah
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
dir_one
This was fixed in version 0.30.208 of util-vserver.
Micah
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Roché Compaan wrote:
> Any reason why /usr/bin/mail would think the hostname is the host's
> hostname and not the vserver's, even though the hostname command correctly
> returns the vserver's hostname?
>
Check your /etc/mailname and /etc/hosts to
t
must only get updated as frequently as googlebot crawls the mailing list.
Micah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDmwYI9n4qXRzy1ioRAjoUAKCFyb6nMv+Iorzh1H1UBWH0z6ozOQCgsYwc
IX9bxFbswRpbFWuI/+lT9Zw=
=Y8Cr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
__
this configure
argument: ./configure --build hppa-linux-gnu -- is this the wrong
argument to pass to set the parisc architecture type to get the proper
263 syscall?
There is no pre-built debian parisc util-vserver packages at the moment
(nor are there ARM packages), but I'm looking to res
Hi,
Please find attached (and included below) a patch to adjust the wording
for the Configure help for the COW link break code. It is a minor patch,
but I believe it tightens it up and corrects the language.
Micah
--- patch-2.6.14.2-vs2.1.0-rc8.diff 2005-11-30 15:15:02.0 -0500
previous (this also bumps the version number one).
Micah
--- testfs.sh-0.09 2005-09-19 04:27:43.0 -0400
+++ testfs.sh-0.10 2005-10-04 17:16:07.0 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
#!/bin/bash
-eR='\e[31m';eG='\e[32m';eY='\e[33m';eB='\e[34m';
Please find attached a diff against testfs.sh-0.09. This diff adds the
-c option to disable color output and also adds the -q option to
mkfs.jfs because without this mkfs.jfs asks if you want to continue
causing the test to fail erroneously.
micah
--- testfs.sh-0.09 2005-09-19 04:27
fy
has not been included in the past, but is about to be.
Micah
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Micah wrote:
> Specifically, the configuration errors when libbeecrypt6 and
> libbeecrypt6-dev are as follows:
>
> configure:27544: checking for hashFunctionContextInit in -lbeecrypt
> configure:27574: gcc -o conftest -Wall -g -O2
/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib/libbeecrypt.so:
undefined reference to `mpadd'
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib/libbeecrypt.so:
undefined reference to `mpeven'
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib/libbeecrypt.so:
undefined reference to `mpaddmul'
collect2:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:02:35PM -0500, Micah wrote:
>
>
> Have a look at: http://deb.riseup.net/vserver/usage/
>
> Specifically the item:
>
> "Howto add an IP to a running v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Have a look at: http://deb.riseup.net/vserver/usage/
Specifically the item:
"Howto add an IP to a running vserver, without restarting it?"
Gaz Wilson wrote:
> Quick question before the weekend - am I correct in saying there is no
> way to add ext
essary
resolution to this missing dependency?
I have not begun to look into unification yet, but from what I can tell
vhashify is a necessary part to do this.
Micah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDBo7k9n4qXRzy1
or savannah
If you are building a debian package, you should almost always report
the bug to the debian BTS, and let the maintainer decide if the bug
should be filed upstream (in this case in savannah). There might be a
debian packaging specific problem that is the cause of the problem, and
enric
s missing some others), so I would guess that
you get "previously applied" errors if fix01 is there already. Apply
these diffs without fix01 and I bet it will work.
micah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDBeto9n4qXRzy1ioRAiQ
re
fixed between that release and .208, in fact there are additional fixes that
Bertl have done for .208.
I am not aware of Debian specific package brokenness, but I would like to
know if there are such things so we can file bugs and get those fixed, poste
haste.
micah
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am forwarding this message to the debian bug ID related to updating
the util-vserver tools to the latest version.
Ola, please be sure to apply the patch that Herbert provides for
util-vserver to fix some additional known issues.
micah
Herbert
e in debian, so I filed a bug against
the package asking Ola to update them and he said he would do so right away.
micah
1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kernel-patch-vserver/news/1.html
2. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=321659
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Congratulations, great work!!
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> Greetings Community!
>
> after some time of testing and ironing out minor
> issues we proudly present the first stable release
> for the 2.6 kernels ...
>
> http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_rel2
ilable in
unstable. This provides a patch for debian kernel-source-2.6.11-7 to
provide vs2.0-rc4. I dont know if this will fix the issue, but it will
get you to a much improved version of vserver, see if your problem
still exists after this change.
Micah
__
the issues) ... nevertheless
> feel free to submit bug reports to the debian maintainers
> for all your issues you encounter with the sarge version.
Please do, dont bug Bertl because the debian packages are out of date,
report the bugs using the Debian BTS (install package reportbug and
run i
Did you compile the legacy kernel API options into the kernel when you
made it?
micah
Marc Fournier schrieb am Monday, den 20. June 2005:
> Hello,
>
> I just came across a strange problem on debian with kernel 2.6.11 and
> debian kernel-patch-vserver 1.9.5.3. When my vserver ro
place the debian newvserver command?
Thanks for the improvements!
micah
On Thu, 05 May 2005, Thomas Gelf wrote:
> vserver vstest build --netdev eth0 --interface 192.168.192.168/24 \
> --initstyle plain --context 501 --hostname vstest.company.local \
> -m debootstrap -- -d
Edit /etc/vservers//fstab to have the filesystem parameters
you want, remove the /tmp line that is in there and put in the one you
want to be mounted.
micah
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Gaz Wilson wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I would like to mount a filesystem as /tmp from outside of the vserver
&g
Depends on what you used as arguments when you created the vserver.
Since its already been created, maybe changing
/etc/vservers//uts/nodename to what you are expecting and
restarting the vserver will get your expected results.
micah
On Mon, 30 May 2005, Thorsten Busse wrote:
> Hi,
>
&
Can you add the bind mount to /etc/vservers/wwwmain/fstab so that it
is mounted on startup?
micah
Oliver Welter schrieb am Friday, den 27. May 2005:
> Hi List,
>
> I have a little problem with vserver Start-up scriots...
> I am running Gentoo Host/Guest with 2.6.9 kernel and v
This would be a great script, just reading the items that you wrote
made me curious about some things in my setup and would like to test
them out, but manually it would be a chore on several of them of course.
micah
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Oliver Dietz wrote:
> Hi NG,
> Hi Herbert,
>
>
Here is an update of more hacking done to port the vserver 1.9.5 patches
to the debian 2.6.8 kernel.
I've applied Bertl's second attempt at the patch ;) to the Debian
2.6.8-15 kernel-source tree, configured everything (including vserver
and kernel debugging options), compiled and installed the
ke
Here is a report of the hacking done last night (or day, depending on
your timezone) to port the vserver 1.9.5.12 patches to the Debian
kernel 2.6.8. Bertl is truely an amazing kernel hacker!
Debian's Sarge, which will freeze "any day now"(tm), will be shipped
with the 2.6.8 kernel as the primarl
Yes, but make sure that you stop the vserver first!
micah
Timo Mueller schrieb am Monday, den 07. March 2005:
> Hey,
>
> how can I completly remove a vserver ?
> Just delete the directory and the configfiles ??
>
> Thanks
>
er would somehow
need to run the vserver command, but wouldn't be able to because it
was in its own context already
Micah
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
ypes of machines available and
seeing the problems can help resolve them.
Micah
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
|1] kernel will
be the fall-back maintenance kernel if for some reason 2.6.8 doesn't
work out.
With this in mind, does anyone know of a debian 2.6.8 kernel patch for
vserver 1.9.4?
Micah
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Stephen Frost wrote:
> All,
>
> Here's the vs1.9.4 patch chang
there.
As I have said over and over and over again, and will say so here
again, I do not want to hijack your package. I simply wanted to either
encourage you to update it before it was too late, or to put together
a different package.
Micah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
s are, and what is going on
with this, and if they need help.
> And, again, the current maintainer seems active, a little suprised he
> hasn't commented on this thread...
The current maintainer has 71 packages to their name, many of them
very high-profile busy packages that need a lot of
atly Bertl if he was not around because he got vacuumed
up by a company.
micah
Herbert Poetzl schrieb am Sunday, den 20. February 2005:
>
> Hi Community!
>
> yesterday evening I had the pleasure to meet with
> Serguei Beloussov. we had excellent Dinner at the
> 'Sch
undqvist and Ron Lee's problem.
> I think it's a good idea, but I'm not the current maintainer, just
> another DD.
and another here...
micah
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
I did not know it existed and I cannot find any man
pages for it. Does it do a "clone" of a vserver?
Micah
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Micah Anderson) writes:
>
> > Then I followed the instructions on
> > http://linux-vserver.org/alpha+util-vserver to unify vservers:
> >
> > 1. mkdir -p /usr/local/etc/vservers/MT/apps/vunify
> &
/local/lib/util-vserver/vunify -v -n MT
/usr/local/lib/util-vserver/vunify -v -n MT
Initializing exclude-list for /vservers/MT (MT)
no reference vserver configured
?
Thanks for any tips!
micah
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserve
emoves its configuration and
vserver files. I mistakenly removed the files before stopping the
vserver last night and it was an interesting adventure to solve that
(credit of course goes to Bertl to track down how).
micah
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@
I just found out the exact thing that you suggested before I read your
message, I had a SNAT line:
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
SNAT all -- 192.168.0.1 anywhere to:212.112.147.194
Duh... thanks :)
Micah
On Wed
You may have missed the section below where I include the
vservers/.conf file which shows clearly that the private IP is
in the IPROOT= variable, and this still doesn't work.
micah
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Liam Helmer wrote:
> To make it communicate using a private IP would involved add
RAW"
/etc/vservers/zun.conf:
S_HOSTNAME="zun"
IPROOT="192.168.0.1"
IPROOTMASK="255.255.255.0"
IPROOTDEV="eth0"
S_FLAGS="lock nproc"
ULIMIT="-u 256 -n 1024"
S_CAPS="CAP_NET_RAW"
Thanks!
micah
"Naturally, the commo
This seems to compile ok! However, there are some ANSI warnings at the
beginning. I am attaching my configure output and the compile output
for your information.
Micah
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Micah Anderson) writes:
>
> > I get the following
I get the following error when I try to compile util-vserver 0.29.2,
this is using linux-2.4.24 on debian woody. I have cleaned the source
and re-configured, but I still get this:
make
make all-am
make[1]: Entering directory /usr/src/vserver/util-vserver-0.29.2'
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.
59 matches
Mail list logo
