In gmane.linux.vserver, you wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Herbert Poetzl wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: >> >>On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest >> >>0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this >> >>time) and all seems to works fine. >> > >> > >> > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it >> > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc >> > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ >> > work for simple things. >> >> I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests? > > possible, well, testme and testfs will not > detect the insecurities introduced by glibc
Ah, I meant we can find out if dietlibc is broken on HPPA or not. I did not mean we can find out if glibc insecurities still exist. >> > PS: I hope that dietlibc on hppa will be fixed soon. >> >> Have the issues on HPPA been brought to the dietlibc developers? > > yes, but AFAICT, they were ignored ... I tried to google around for references to this to see if I could help push these up, but didn't find anything. Sometimes all it takes is a ping to the right place to get people to realise that they overlooked something. Micah _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
