On Wednesday 26 November 2003 07:50, Charles Dale wrote:
> It's a bit hard to read what you posted because after a certain point all
> the hard returns seem to have been folded. But I think you have this in
> your redhat9.conf:
>
> S_CAPS="CAP_NET_RAW CAP_SYS_ADMIN CAP_NET_ADMIN"
>
> Change that to
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2003 4:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: RE: [Vserver] Rpms for vserver 0.27 (got it)
>
>
> Here it is,
>
> Last login: Sun Nov 23 21:53:32 2003
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
eral you don't need to force a context
#S_CONTEXT=
>
> From: "Charles Dale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/11/25 Tue PM 08:16:37 EST
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: RE: [Vserver] Rpms for vserver 0.27 (got it)
>
> [snip]
>
> &g
[snip]
> Nov 24 12:00:13 redhat9 named: named: capset failed: Operation not
permitted
> Nov 24 12:00:13 redhat9 named: named startup failed
Looks to me like CAP_SYS_RESOURCE hasn't been enabled for some reason for
that vserver. Please post contents of the vserver conf file.
BTW, (to list in gen
thinks is the problem - can't help without specific failure & logging
> info.
>
> Cheers,
> Chuck
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday
-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2003 1:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: RE: [Vserver] Rpms for vserver 0.27 (got it)
>
>
> Hello Chuck,
>
> Is there some
quot;Charles Dale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/11/23 Sun PM 11:27:03 EST
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: RE: [Vserver] Rpms for vserver 0.27 (got it)
>
> Hmm can someone else answer this one please, I've lost track of what
> happened to the Per Context Q
Am Montag, 24. November 2003 05:27 schrieb Charles Dale:
> Hmm can someone else answer this one please, I've lost track of what
> happened to the Per Context Quota & Disk Limit patches after 1.0. Herbert
> did they get merged into the main patch?
>
> Some of the memory & process limits are controll
gt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, 24 November 2003 3:04 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: RE: [Vserver] Rpms for vserver 0.27 (got it)
> >
> >
> > Hey Chuck,
> >
> > It worked out perfectly, and I know have it running on RH9
> >
er 2003 3:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE: [Vserver] Rpms for vserver 0.27 (got it)
>
>
> Hey Chuck,
>
> It worked out perfectly, and I know have it running on RH9
> (w/min.RH9 vserver). My question is how do I set the
> limitation for disk space, memory, and
rom: "Charles Dale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/11/23 Sun AM 09:04:27 EST
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [Vserver] Rpms for vserver 0.27 (got it)
>
> [Sorry accidentally sent this half way through writing it.]
>
0
Hope this helps. Let us know any problems you have.
Cheers,
Chuck
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, 23 November 2003 4:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Vserver] Rpms for vserver
n't there. The FAQ[2] contains lots of useful
hints.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, 23 November 2003 4:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Vserver] Rpms for vserv
21 EST
> To: Vserver mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Vserver] Rpms for vserver 0.27 (got it)
>
>
reply
Description: null
Ok, I found why people had problems with the RPMs I was producing
for the vserver package. The rpms were produced on a rh7.0 system and this
was fine. But I was signing them before uploading using an rh9 rpm utility and
this was causing the problem. Now, when signed on rh7, they are working again.
15 matches
Mail list logo
