Hi
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -, Luís Miguel Silva wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just thought of something!
> How about the vserver project "united" with the openmosix project?
> It would be great to be able to have multiple vservers enjoying the
> cheerfull'blesses of multi'proces
Am Montag, 10. November 2003 16:54 schrieb Lyn St George:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:53:03 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> >> I now tried another imap daemon and it is pretty better and faster.
> >
> > Could please share a secret as to what another imap daemon?
> >I've been trying to get rid of uw-i
-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Matthew Nuzum
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: OT: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
>
> I have cyrus imapd running in a vserver without issue. I fol
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:58:59 -0500 (EST), Cathy Sarisky wrote:
>I'm using Courier for IMAP within a vserver with no problems. (Check the
>config file, tho, I think I had to specify the IP somewhere -- not in
>front of that install right now, but if you need the info, let me know
>and I'll find
://www.followers.net/isp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lyn St George
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:53:03 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
I'm using Courier for IMAP within a vserver with no problems. (Check the
config file, tho, I think I had to specify the IP somewhere -- not in
front of that install right now, but if you need the info, let me know
and I'll find it.)
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Lyn St George wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:53:03 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>> I now tried another imap daemon and it is pretty better and faster.
> Could please share a secret as to what another imap daemon?
>I've been trying to get rid of uw-imapd for years..
>
Has anyone had experience of Cyrus-imap ? I find
t;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:06:17PM +1100, Charles Dale wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> > Re: CHPOSX thing, it looks pretty cool. But I fail to see how it would
b
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 08:33:10PM -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
[cut]
> > true, I/O bound processes are not good for migrating, but not all
> > has that kind of processes. And even if they do... Gbit networking
> > is cheap, and is certainly faster than most harddrives. So, fill a
> > server with
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:06:17PM +1100, Charles Dale wrote:
[cut]
> Re: CHPOSX thing, it looks pretty cool. But I fail to see how it would be
> particularly useful for a vserver running typical hosting tasks such as web
> server & mail. Is Apache going to be very happy to be knocked out, find
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:03:39AM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> > i want ALL to be able to move. Even if i have to mark them all
> > suspended. Saving them, transfering them to another machine, and
> > warm them up again.
> That sounds like something chpox can do:
> http://www.cluster.kiev.u
Zitat von Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > i want ALL to be able to move. Even if i have to mark them all
> > suspended. Saving them, transfering them to another machine, and
> > warm them up again.
> That sounds like something chpox can do:
> http://www.cluster.kiev.ua/tasks/chpx_eng.
Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > I have been using courier-imapd
> IIRC, courier requirers to be alone on machine it's installed-on, which
> rules it out.
> It's a great application for vserver though, until vserver I couldn't use
> courier-based solutions, and now it's just a
> I have been using courier-imapd
IIRC, courier requirers to be alone on machine it's installed-on, which
rules it out.
It's a great application for vserver though, until vserver I couldn't use
courier-based solutions, and now it's just a matter of installing vserver.
great.
But what about shel
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Dariush Pietrzak
Enviada: segunda-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2003 7:53
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: OT: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
> I now tried another imap daemon and it is pretty better and faster.
Could please share a se
Well Dovecot is quite nice (dovecot.something.fi, hmm you better ask Googs). BUT
don't try it with mbox mailboxes. I got some pretty bad borkage. I also
couldn't understand how the chrooting worked - it failed for some of my users
but I couldn't work out why.
It's probably great if you run it with
> I now tried another imap daemon and it is pretty better and faster.
Could please share a secret as to what another imap daemon?
I've been trying to get rid of uw-imapd for years..
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
Namagumi namagomi namagoroshi
Enviada: segunda-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2003 7:09
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
> We used to use SCSI disks but with the hdd inovations on the last years we realised
> that its a waste of money
> (in our case) to buy scsi!
It seems like in
> We used to use SCSI disks but with the hdd inovations on the last years we realised
> that its a waste of money
> (in our case) to buy scsi!
It seems like in your case SCSI is exactly what you need.
IE: 1) you've got problems with performance
2) caused by mailserver - either disk IO or ne
> i want ALL to be able to move. Even if i have to mark them all
> suspended. Saving them, transfering them to another machine, and
> warm them up again.
That sounds like something chpox can do:
http://www.cluster.kiev.ua/tasks/chpx_eng.html
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0
> > a) I/O bound applications that only slow down when migrated to a
> different
> > node on the cluster, or
> > b) Applications that are incompatible with Mosix for various reasons
> > (threaded, shmem, device dependent etc.) such as Database software,
> > Apache and other server processes.
>
>
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:38:27PM +0100, Jan-Marc Pilawa wrote:
> Zitat von [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:09:59PM +0100, Jan-Marc Pilawa wrote:
> > > I thought about it half a year ago. Well, i tried it out and
> > openmosix
> > > and veserver-patch compiled. The Problem is,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:12:13PM -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
it is annoying that your mail program does not wrap long lines.
> We have been working on an OpenMosix cluster in the computer club at
> the school where I'm taking classes now. I've found that the server
> applications that I typic
Zitat von [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:09:59PM +0100, Jan-Marc Pilawa wrote:
> > I thought about it half a year ago. Well, i tried it out and
> openmosix
> > and veserver-patch compiled. The Problem is, that the knowledge of
> the
> > context needs to be migrated, too. in a firs
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:09:59PM +0100, Jan-Marc Pilawa wrote:
> I thought about it half a year ago. Well, i tried it out and openmosix
> and veserver-patch compiled. The Problem is, that the knowledge of the
> context needs to be migrated, too. in a first attempt it would be
> sufficient to impl
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 05:46:29PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:55:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
> > yes it would, but i would prefer to move a whole vserver userland context,
> > and not just a single process.
>
> you can already move the vserver in a v
s.net/portfolio/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:vserver-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LuÃs Miguel Silva
> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 3:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
>
> Hell
that its a waste of money
(in our case) to buy scsi!
Thanks,
LuÃs
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Matthew Nuzum
Enviada: domingo, 9 de Novembro de 2003 20:12
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: RE: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
We have been
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:vserver-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LuÃs Miguel Silva
> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 12:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
>
> Yes, my server is heavily loaded.
> I have 2 IDE disks at 7200rpm, doing raid1.
&
Zitat von klaus oblasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> on my vserver-cluster at frankfurt there is a
> buggy-mix-kernel (2.4.19ctx13mos) of vserver & openmosix running.
> (only a fast cut-together of openmosix-path & vserver-path)
>
> only the "masterprozesses" of the servers are migrateing.
> no vserve
Zitat von [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -, Lu?s Miguel Silva wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I just thought of something!
> > How about the vserver project "united" with the openmosix project?
> > It would be great to be able to have multiple vservers enjoying th
hai herbert!
> I, for my part, am willing to port the vserver stuff on
> a mosix kernel, if somebody does the testing ...
if posible openmosix, not mosix.
on my vserver-cluster at frankfurt there is a
buggy-mix-kernel (2.4.19ctx13mos) of vserver & openmosix running.
(only a fast cut-together of o
25 V. N. de Gaia
> > | Portugal
> > | T: +351 22 3745730/3/5 F: +351 22 3745738
> > | G: +351 93 6371253 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > | H: http://lms.ispgaya.pt/
> > +-
> > -Mensagem original-
> > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Herb
--
> -Mensagem original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Herbert
> Poetzl
> Enviada: domingo, 9 de Novembro de 2003 16:38
> Para: Luís Miguel Silva
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Assunto: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix..
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Herbert Poetzl
> Enviada: domingo, 9 de Novembro de 2003 16:38
> Para: Luís Miguel Silva
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Assunto: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -, Luís Miguel Silva wrote:
> &g
---
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Herbert Poetzl
Enviada: domingo, 9 de Novembro de 2003 16:38
Para: Luís Miguel Silva
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:55:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -, Lu?s Miguel Silva wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I just thought of something!
> > How about the vserver project "united" with the openmosix project?
> > It would be great to be able
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -, Luís Miguel Silva wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just thought of something!
> How about the vserver project "united" with the openmosix project?
> It would be great to be able to have multiple vservers enjoying
> the cheerfull'blesses of multi'processing
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -, Lu?s Miguel Silva wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just thought of something!
> How about the vserver project "united" with the openmosix project?
> It would be great to be able to have multiple vservers enjoying the
> cheerfull'blesses of multi'processing
Hello everybody,
I just thought of something!
How about the vserver project "united" with the openmosix project?
It would be great to be able to have multiple vservers enjoying the cheerfull'blesses
of multi'processing.
One of my servers is a X86 2.6ghz with 512Mb ram running about 6 vservers an
40 matches
Mail list logo
