Hi
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -, Luís Miguel Silva wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just thought of something!
> How about the vserver project "united" with the openmosix project?
> It would be great to be able to have multiple vservers enjoying the
> cheerfull'blesses of multi'proces
Am Montag, 10. November 2003 16:54 schrieb Lyn St George:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:53:03 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> >> I now tried another imap daemon and it is pretty better and faster.
> >
> > Could please share a secret as to what another imap daemon?
> >I've been trying to get rid of uw-i
-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Matthew Nuzum
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: OT: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
>
> I have cyrus imapd running in a vserver without issue. I fol
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:58:59 -0500 (EST), Cathy Sarisky wrote:
>I'm using Courier for IMAP within a vserver with no problems. (Check the
>config file, tho, I think I had to specify the IP somewhere -- not in
>front of that install right now, but if you need the info, let me know
>and I'll find
://www.followers.net/isp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lyn St George
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:53:03 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
I'm using Courier for IMAP within a vserver with no problems. (Check the
config file, tho, I think I had to specify the IP somewhere -- not in
front of that install right now, but if you need the info, let me know
and I'll find it.)
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Lyn St George wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:53:03 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>> I now tried another imap daemon and it is pretty better and faster.
> Could please share a secret as to what another imap daemon?
>I've been trying to get rid of uw-imapd for years..
>
Has anyone had experience of Cyrus-imap ? I find
t;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:06:17PM +1100, Charles Dale wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> > Re: CHPOSX thing, it looks pretty cool. But I fail to see how it would
b
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 08:33:10PM -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
[cut]
> > true, I/O bound processes are not good for migrating, but not all
> > has that kind of processes. And even if they do... Gbit networking
> > is cheap, and is certainly faster than most harddrives. So, fill a
> > server with
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:06:17PM +1100, Charles Dale wrote:
[cut]
> Re: CHPOSX thing, it looks pretty cool. But I fail to see how it would be
> particularly useful for a vserver running typical hosting tasks such as web
> server & mail. Is Apache going to be very happy to be knocked out, find
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:03:39AM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> > i want ALL to be able to move. Even if i have to mark them all
> > suspended. Saving them, transfering them to another machine, and
> > warm them up again.
> That sounds like something chpox can do:
> http://www.cluster.kiev.u
Zitat von Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > i want ALL to be able to move. Even if i have to mark them all
> > suspended. Saving them, transfering them to another machine, and
> > warm them up again.
> That sounds like something chpox can do:
> http://www.cluster.kiev.ua/tasks/chpx_eng.
Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > I have been using courier-imapd
> IIRC, courier requirers to be alone on machine it's installed-on, which
> rules it out.
> It's a great application for vserver though, until vserver I couldn't use
> courier-based solutions, and now it's just a
> I have been using courier-imapd
IIRC, courier requirers to be alone on machine it's installed-on, which
rules it out.
It's a great application for vserver though, until vserver I couldn't use
courier-based solutions, and now it's just a matter of installing vserver.
great.
But what about shel
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Dariush Pietrzak
Enviada: segunda-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2003 7:53
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: OT: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
> I now tried another imap daemon and it is pretty better and faster.
Could please share a se
Well Dovecot is quite nice (dovecot.something.fi, hmm you better ask Googs). BUT
don't try it with mbox mailboxes. I got some pretty bad borkage. I also
couldn't understand how the chrooting worked - it failed for some of my users
but I couldn't work out why.
It's probably great if you run it with
> I now tried another imap daemon and it is pretty better and faster.
Could please share a secret as to what another imap daemon?
I've been trying to get rid of uw-imapd for years..
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
Namagumi namagomi namagoroshi
Enviada: segunda-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2003 7:09
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
> We used to use SCSI disks but with the hdd inovations on the last years we realised
> that its a waste of money
> (in our case) to buy scsi!
It seems like in
> We used to use SCSI disks but with the hdd inovations on the last years we realised
> that its a waste of money
> (in our case) to buy scsi!
It seems like in your case SCSI is exactly what you need.
IE: 1) you've got problems with performance
2) caused by mailserver - either disk IO or ne
> i want ALL to be able to move. Even if i have to mark them all
> suspended. Saving them, transfering them to another machine, and
> warm them up again.
That sounds like something chpox can do:
http://www.cluster.kiev.ua/tasks/chpx_eng.html
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0
> > a) I/O bound applications that only slow down when migrated to a
> different
> > node on the cluster, or
> > b) Applications that are incompatible with Mosix for various reasons
> > (threaded, shmem, device dependent etc.) such as Database software,
> > Apache and other server processes.
>
>
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:38:27PM +0100, Jan-Marc Pilawa wrote:
> Zitat von [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:09:59PM +0100, Jan-Marc Pilawa wrote:
> > > I thought about it half a year ago. Well, i tried it out and
> > openmosix
> > > and veserver-patch compiled. The Problem is,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:12:13PM -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
it is annoying that your mail program does not wrap long lines.
> We have been working on an OpenMosix cluster in the computer club at
> the school where I'm taking classes now. I've found that the server
> applications that I typic
Zitat von [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:09:59PM +0100, Jan-Marc Pilawa wrote:
> > I thought about it half a year ago. Well, i tried it out and
> openmosix
> > and veserver-patch compiled. The Problem is, that the knowledge of
> the
> > context needs to be migrated, too. in a firs
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:09:59PM +0100, Jan-Marc Pilawa wrote:
> I thought about it half a year ago. Well, i tried it out and openmosix
> and veserver-patch compiled. The Problem is, that the knowledge of the
> context needs to be migrated, too. in a first attempt it would be
> sufficient to impl
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 05:46:29PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:55:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
> > yes it would, but i would prefer to move a whole vserver userland context,
> > and not just a single process.
>
> you can already move the vserver in a v
s.net/portfolio/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:vserver-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LuÃs Miguel Silva
> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 3:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
>
> Hell
that its a waste of money
(in our case) to buy scsi!
Thanks,
LuÃs
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Matthew Nuzum
Enviada: domingo, 9 de Novembro de 2003 20:12
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: RE: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
We have been
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:vserver-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LuÃs Miguel Silva
> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 12:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
>
> Yes, my server is heavily loaded.
> I have 2 IDE disks at 7200rpm, doing raid1.
&
Zitat von [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -, Lu?s Miguel Silva wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I just thought of something!
> > How about the vserver project "united" with the openmosix project?
> > It would be great to be able to have multiple vservers enjoying th
25 V. N. de Gaia
> > | Portugal
> > | T: +351 22 3745730/3/5 F: +351 22 3745738
> > | G: +351 93 6371253 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > | H: http://lms.ispgaya.pt/
> > +-
> > -Mensagem original-
> > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Herb
--
> -Mensagem original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Herbert
> Poetzl
> Enviada: domingo, 9 de Novembro de 2003 16:38
> Para: Luís Miguel Silva
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Assunto: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix..
vídio 4400-025 V. N. de Gaia
> | Portugal
> | T: +351 22 3745730/3/5 F: +351 22 3745738
> | G: +351 93 6371253 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | H: http://lms.ispgaya.pt/
> +-
> -Mensagem original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [
---
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Herbert Poetzl
Enviada: domingo, 9 de Novembro de 2003 16:38
Para: Luís Miguel Silva
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:55:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -, Lu?s Miguel Silva wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I just thought of something!
> > How about the vserver project "united" with the openmosix project?
> > It would be great to be able
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -, Luís Miguel Silva wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just thought of something!
> How about the vserver project "united" with the openmosix project?
> It would be great to be able to have multiple vservers enjoying
> the cheerfull'blesses of multi'processing
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:48:08AM -, Lu?s Miguel Silva wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just thought of something!
> How about the vserver project "united" with the openmosix project?
> It would be great to be able to have multiple vservers enjoying the
> cheerfull'blesses of multi'processing
37 matches
Mail list logo
