[Vyatta-users] Routing Policy Confusion

I would like to be able to specify which BGP routes get exported, specifically. From what I understand, policies are the way to go about this. If someone could take the liberty to explain exactly what the statement below achieves I would be greatful: policy-statement Next_Hop_Self {

Re: [Vyatta-users] Routing Policy Confusion

Hi Shane, First off, in your BGP peer configuration, you're telling your peer that the next-hop to reach your prefixes is itself. So, anything the peer receives from you will have a next-hop of ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ (which would be the peer's IP address). Under most circumstances, you would not

Re: [Vyatta-users] Routing Policy Confusion

Thanks so much. Happy Holidays to you and everyone on the mailing list. Shane McKinley Habersham EMC -Original Message- From: Robyn Orosz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 9:55 AM To: Shane McKinley Cc: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com Subject: Re:

Re: [Vyatta-users] Newbie question about routing

Hi Sergio. It looks odd but I actually see a reply from 10.20.20.2 I set a static route on the gateway 172.10.0.5 in order to forward all to the vyatta routerI'm really a bit puzzled by this Thanks, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Send Vyatta-users mailing list submissions to

[Vyatta-users] show bgp routes only showing directly connected routes

I have entered the polcies for all of my subnets like Robyn instructed and only directly connected routes (on my interface) are showing when executing show bgp routes. I am not acually connected to the bgp peer, could this be the issue? It seemed quite strange acually, before I rebooted there

Re: [Vyatta-users] show bgp routes only showing directly connectedroutes

Hi Shane, Without a BGP neighbor passing you routes derived with this protocol, you won't see any BGP routes. So, yes, not having a peering session would be a good guess as to the reason for the output you are seeing. To view all routes in the routing table use the show routes command - you

Re: [Vyatta-users] show bgp routes only showing directly connectedroutes

Hi Shane, only directly connected routes (on my interface) are showing when executing show bgp routes. Allan has given you the answer. before I rebooted there were only 3 routes showing when executing show bgp routes. This is a known issue which would be fixed in the next release By the

[Vyatta-users] Explanation of RIP and BGP

Hello Vyattans. I've got a home network setup with Vyatta OFR, my wireless router on one subnet and 3 servers on another. I have been seeing a lot of buzz about BGP and RIP, and in spite of my reading and googling, I am not totally understanding what the difference is, what it is they

Re: [Vyatta-users] show bgp routes only showing directly connectedroutes

Actually, term 1 is only necessary for ibgp peers - ebgp peers set the opposite connected interface address as the next-hop for incoming bgp routes automatically. Further, in production environment, because of the term 1, the 250k or so bgp routes really cost very much computing time which you

Re: [Vyatta-users] VRRP Release Timeframe?

Ken: We hope to address the VRRP issues by the next major release expected in the first half of next year (aka VC4). We also expect to support QoS in the same timeframe. You may also want to take a look at the Clustering feature on VC3, though it currently supports one backup node. I'll defer

Re: [Vyatta-users] VRRP Release Timeframe?

Yes, it's based on heartbeat, and it should allow you to specify any init.d process as a service. However, not all are fully integrated with the router manager, so you may run into issues. Best, Justin On Dec 18, 2007 2:01 PM, Ken Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sanjoy, Thank you for your

[Vyatta-users] All I Want for Christmas

Hi all, I'd like to publiclly share something I'd like for Christmas. Currently when the command show interfaces, or show interfaces system, or show interfaces system enabled is used the output is very terse. It very closely resembles the output of ifconfig. Not a bad thing, but it could be a

Re: [Vyatta-users] All I Want for Christmas

Not a bad idea. File an enhancement request, please: http://bugzilla.vyatta.com/ -- Dave _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Davey Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1:33 PM To: Vyatta-Users Subject: [Vyatta-users] All I Want for Christmas Hi all, I'd

[Vyatta-users] VPN under NAT

How to configure a VPN IPsec between 2 vyatta router both under NAT? A test a lot but seem to function only when al least one vyatta in over Internet (not under NAT)... no luck whith both under NAT. This function: vyattaVPN1 internet -NAT - vyattaVNP2 This NOT function: vyattaVPN1 -

Re: [Vyatta-users] VPN under NAT

If they are both in private address space, the issue is whether the two know how to communicate with each other, as private address space isn't routeable -- Best, Justin On Dec 18, 2007 5:36 PM, Marco De Sortis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How to configure a VPN IPsec between 2 vyatta router both

Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

Hi, Thanks. I just could not traceroute to the router and according to my peering upstream, they mention that they did not receive any of my prefix announcement. Basically i just want to do a simple setup at this moment with one box running Vyatta and eth0 is link to one of our upstream provider

Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

Hi, I think your nexthop IP should be your ISP IP address and not your own. Also check with your ISP if they can confirm about BGP session establishment, Most router like Juniper, Cisco can explain a lot in their output the reasons if the session is not established. Also loopback IP is