"disable"
destination {
port-number xxx
}
}
rule 7 {
protocol: "udp"
action: "accept"
log: "disable"
destination {
port-number xxx
}
}
rule 8 {
protocol: "all"
action: "drop"
log: "disable"
source {
network: "0.0.0.0/0"
}
}
}
}
I have applied this setting to my interface's firewall as : in and local .
When I try to enable this firewall setting , I can't ping to my ISP
gateway (modem IP) too.
Please tell me what I want to change to implement it on VC3 ?
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
Abhilash S
___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
s issue on your system,
> see the following post to the user's list:
>
> http://mailman.vyatta.com/pipermail/vyatta-users/2007-November/002406.html
>
> This bug has been fixed and will no longer be an issue in the next release.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Robyn
>
>
>
bash/perl script? Has anyone created
rules like this that take into account bandwidth or latency?
Any suggestions that can be offered about this architecture would be
great before we start testing this.
Thanks
Abhilash S
Ascella Technologies, Inc
www.ascellatech.com
at we could increase the "cost" of the
2Mb connection as we approach the maximum. With this new requirement,
does OSPF still make sense for us? If not, could you explain why OSPF
may not be the choice for us?
Thanks,
Abhilash S
Ascella Technologies, Inc.
www.
Hi,
This makes sense. We will try the multi WAN load balancing.
Thanks,
Abhilash S
Ascella Technologies, Inc.
www.ascellatech.com
On Feb 5, 2008 11:59 AM, Dave Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your quick reply. I am agreed that we can test the
> &
