[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
>> I'd like to release 2.1_beta2.
>> On Windows I'd use quesoglc-0.7-svn-755, Linux distros would need to depend
>> on ">=quesoglc-0.6 !quesoglc-0.7.0".
>>
>> Any objections? Otherwise I'll do it this weekend.
>
> I hope I am in time !
>
> I have just released QuesoGLC
Message d'origine
>De: Dennis Schridde
>A: Development list
>Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:35:07 +0100
>Sujet: Re: [Warzone-dev] 2.1 beta 2
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I'd like to release 2.1_beta2.
&
Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> I have committed some performance optimizations to trunk that doubled
> the fps count on my Intel X3000. I would like to hear reports from
> other people if it gives them improved performance, and no new bugs,
and on IRC:
> can those of you who are CPU-limited notice an
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have committed some performance optimizations to trunk that doubled
> > the fps count on my Intel X3000. I would like to hear reports from
> > other people if it gives them improved performance, and no new bugs,
Looks like r4024.
Giel van Schijndel schrieb:
> Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
>
> What revision is this ?
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Warzone-dev mailing list
> Warzone-dev@gna.org
> https:
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
> I have committed some performance optimizations to trunk that doubled
> the fps count on my Intel X3000. I would like to hear reports from
> other people if it gives them improved performance, and no new bugs,
> before I port it to the 2.1 branch. There is no reason to
I have committed some performance optimizations to trunk that doubled
the fps count on my Intel X3000. I would like to hear reports from
other people if it gives them improved performance, and no new bugs,
before I port it to the 2.1 branch. There is no reason to wait with
beta2 for this work, but
The Mac OS X version builds just fine under the 2.1 branch right now.
Starting out the 1-player campaign works fine, too. I'm still not a
fan of the pause-when-losing-focus 'feature' but that's a personal
preference I just can't help from expressing. No objection from the
Mac OS X corner to a 2.1
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> Any objections? Otherwise I'll do it this weekend.
Nope, you've got my vote.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzo
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Per: Does r3970 / patch #994 revert "Reduce the number of atmospheric
> particles generated and lower the CPU usage", or was that another change?
Other change. Unrelated.
- Per
_
I'd like to release 2.1_beta2.
On Windows I'd use quesoglc-0.7-svn-755, Linux distros would need to depend
on ">=quesoglc-0.6 !quesoglc-0.7.0".
Any objections? Otherwise I'll do it this weekend.
Per: Does r3970 / patch #994 revert "Reduce the number of atmospheric
particles generated and lower
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2008 19:53:00 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> AFAIK the font issue Per mentioned originates from QuesoGLC. May be for
> the "quiet release" it would be safer to indicate that version 0.7.0 of
> QuesoGLC is buggy on some platforms and that people should stick to 0.6.5.
>
> A
order to bring this branch up to date. Obviously, any help is appreciated :)Regards,Bertrand.Message d'origine
>Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:39:55 +0100
>De: Giel van Schijndel
>A: Development list
>Sujet: Re: [Warzone-dev] 2.1 beta 2
>
>
>
>Dennis Schridde schree
ue, 26 Feb 2008 09:33:06 +0100
>De: "Per Inge Mathisen"
>A: "Development list"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sujet: Re: [Warzone-dev] 2.1 beta 2
>
>
>
>Let's make a quiet beta release for this one. That is, just announced
>on th
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> So please vote now, for or against release of 2.1_beta2 by the end of the
> week.
Looking at this changelog I'm all for releasing a new 2.1_beta2 (and the
. Unlike last time though, I would like to reach a consensus for the
deadline/release-date on the mailing list and
Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 00:27:01 schrieb Freddie Witherden:
> Hi all,
>
> > So please vote now, for or against release of 2.1_beta2 by the end
> > of the
> > week.
>
> So long as GLC works as expected under Windows, I am for it. If not
> it might be worth holding off a few more days until we
Let's make a quiet beta release for this one. That is, just announced
on the forums, not on external sites. IMHO, we need to figure out if
the font issue is under control before we attract more disappointed
first time users. But I am all for a quick, new beta release. The
current beta is badly brok
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Freddie Witherden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > So please vote now, for or against release of 2.1_beta2 by the end
> > of the
> > week.
>
> So long as GLC works as expected under Windows, I am for it. If not
> it might be worth holding off a few mo
Hi all,
> So please vote now, for or against release of 2.1_beta2 by the end
> of the
> week.
So long as GLC works as expected under Windows, I am for it. If not
it might be worth holding off a few more days until we can get
something together.
On the netcode front everything is suspicious
Hi everyone!
I'd like to call for votes against releasing beta2 (and hope it remains
silent ;) ).
Quite some issues were fixed, many of which were kind of show stoppers.
Is anything forgotten that needs to be urgently fixed before other testing
(netcode *cough*) can go on?
So please vote now, f
20 matches
Mail list logo
