Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 05:21 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:27:51 -0500 Troman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a cleaner approach, but for me it is more intuitively to use
MALLOC
since already the name implies that malloc functionality will be
used at
some point. And
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:27:51 -0500 Troman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a cleaner approach, but for me it is more intuitively to use
MALLOC
since already the name implies that malloc functionality will be
used at
some point. And these 2 new macros will not replace all occurances
of
MALLOC,
Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2006 22:27 schrieb Troman:
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Schridde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Development list warzone-dev@gna.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Warzone-dev] More patches for warnings
Am
- Original Message -
From: Gerard Krol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Development list warzone-dev@gna.org
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Warzone-dev] More patches for warnings
[...]
The alternative is that I add casts to all MALLOC's that not yet have
them
On 11/1/06, Dennis Schridde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MALLOC itself is a macro around some custom wrapper around malloc...
So perhaps we should also check if we (additionally to using this NEW wrapper)
could drop that MALLOC malloc wrapper...
(I don't really know what exact functionality MALLOC
