On 1/7/10, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:01 AM, wrote:
> > PNG optimization, also known as 'Crush them all!'.
>
> Again?
>
> Did you measure any significant savings from doing this? It is kinda
> annoying to have to download every image anew for every working copy,
> y
On Jan 7, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> Did you measure any significant savings from doing this?
Just slightly under 10MB.
--
My Web Sites:
http://dak180.users.sourceforge.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME c
On Thursday, 7 January 2010 at 14:40, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> Did you measure any significant savings from doing this?
"find -name \*.png -exec cat '{}' \; | wc -c" says 52889643 before vs. 48320543
bytes after.
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:01 AM, wrote:
> PNG optimization, also known as 'Crush them all!'.
Again?
Did you measure any significant savings from doing this? It is kinda
annoying to have to download every image anew for every working copy,
you know.
- Per
