On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Kreuvf wrote:
> 1. I am astonished: I carefully wrote this to not include any ego
> stuff/personal
> attacks. And there is not a single accusation in there, I would say.
I was making it extra clear that I don't really mind if you disagree
with me on the question o
Guangcong Luo wrote:
>> IMHO we should just release when it is release day (for every release, not
>> only
>> RCs) and create the missing stuff asap. That might wake the urge in some
>> community members to try releasing stuff for their beloved platform,
>> generally
>> speaking. We are no big co
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 12:33:14PM -0500, Guangcong Luo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Stephen Swaney wrote:
> > Personal ego is no justification for slowing down the
> > process.
>
> Personal ego is a serious accusation, and to equate it with a desire
> not to fracture the community is
On Friday, 3 September 2010 at 14:37, Guangcong Luo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Christian Ohm wrote:
> > Do you know the difference between open source and commercial software?
> > Commercial software has to make users happy, because they pay the
> > developers.
> > Open source soft
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Kreuvf wrote:
> Market share? Comparing market share is pretty useless here. While you usually
> get your GNU/Linux for free, you have to pay (too much IMHO ;X) for your OS X
> (and its SPs^H^H^H new versions), so this metric is extremely biased towards
> OS
> X. S
On Friday, 3 September 2010 at 12:33, Guangcong Luo wrote:
> Dude, you use Linux, a platform with a sixth the marketshare of OS X.
And probably six times as much developers as OS X.
Do you know the difference between open source and commercial software?
Commercial software has to make users happ
Guangcong Luo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Stephen Swaney wrote:
>> This is just silly, especially in light of OSX being such a minor
>> platform.
>
> Dude, you use Linux, a platform with a sixth the marketshare of OS X.
Market share? Comparing market share is pretty useless here. Whi
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Stephen Swaney wrote:
> This is just silly, especially in light of OSX being such a minor
> platform.
Dude, you use Linux, a platform with a sixth the marketshare of OS X.
You, of all people, should understand the flaws of marginalizing a
medium-sized platform.
>
On 9/2/10, Guangcong Luo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:24 AM, buginator wrote:
> > We need to kick this release out ASAP--we are already late.
> > This release does change lots of stuff, and 1-5 day additional testing
> > by as many people as we can get is sorely needed.
> >
> > I see no
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:03:19AM -0500, Guangcong Luo wrote:
> And in case someone is entertaining the possibility, I object to the
> idea of releasing a Windows and Linux build before a Mac build.
This is just silly, especially in light of OSX being such a minor
platform.
We are trying to get
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:24 AM, buginator wrote:
> We need to kick this release out ASAP--we are already late.
> This release does change lots of stuff, and 1-5 day additional testing
> by as many people as we can get is sorely needed.
>
> I see no valid reason waiting for mac builds at this time
On 9/2/10, Guangcong Luo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Kliman wrote:
> > I object on the grounds that I will be gone until next Tues. night.
> Unless of course, someone else wants to make the mac builds?
>
>
> I won't have a Mac until Friday night, so we may have to postpone
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Kliman wrote:
> I object on the grounds that I will be gone until next Tues. night. Unless
> of course, someone else wants to make the mac builds?
I won't have a Mac until Friday night, so we may have to postpone until then.
And in case someone is entert
On Sep 2, 2010, at 12:43 AM, buginator wrote:
> On 8/30/10, Kreuvf wrote:
>> buginator wrote:
>>> Anyone got any objections of doing the RC release late Monday or late
>>> Tuesday?
>>
>> I do not object.
>
>
> Things didn't go as planned, and I had to make a short trip, but I am back
> now.
On Sep 2, 2010, at 12:43 AM, buginator wrote:
> On 8/30/10, Kreuvf wrote:
>> buginator wrote:
>>> Anyone got any objections of doing the RC release late Monday or late
>>> Tuesday?
>>
>> I do not object.
>
>
> Things didn't go as planned, and I had to make a short trip, but I am back
> now.
On 8/30/10, Kreuvf wrote:
> buginator wrote:
> > Anyone got any objections of doing the RC release late Monday or late
> Tuesday?
>
> I do not object.
Things didn't go as planned, and I had to make a short trip, but I am back now.
New plan is to tag on Thursday night PST.
The changelog should
buginator wrote:
> Anyone got any objections of doing the RC release late Monday or late Tuesday?
I do not object.
- Kreuvf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/list
Anyone got any objections of doing the RC release late Monday or late Tuesday?
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
18 matches
Mail list logo
