No. I know we also use some win32 libraries.
Anyone know of a tool that will give a diffinitive answer to this question?
Bret
Chuck vdL wrote:
Hmm something else just occured to me, when I installed Watir it
pulled down a bunch of gems with it. I wonder if I need to use their
librarian
heres my guess - the firewatir code uses lots of whats really
javascript embedded in the ruby file. I think the parser is having a
hard time figuring out whats ruby and whats javascript
If you poke around in the lines suggested by the parser, you might be
able rearrange some of the code to
OK so I went and looked.. it's not javascript
-=-=- snip-=-=
class Radio RadioCheckCommon
def initialize *args
=-=-=-= snip =-=-=-=
its the * in *args that's giving it a fit.. Now understand please
that my ruby coding skills are in their infancy.. and I've not gotten
into defining my
Thanks for sharing your report. I looked at Ruby in Steel over a year
ago and it sounds like it has made a lot of progress since then.
Back then, our developers were using Visual Studio as well. I agree that
it is very attractive for this kind of environment.
Bret
Chuck vdL wrote:
I'm
OK the putting that in 'brackets' (sorry still think of those as
parenthesis, and [] as brackets..) eliminated that error and got me a
new one.. (heh isn't this fun)
Now the problem is on line 1078 column 39 of firefox.rbanother
unexpected token, this time a comma..
So I went and
Chuck vdL wrote:
(and if these things get stuff working, do I need to raise a jira
issue for this so we make sure to make these changes in the watir
source? (point me at instructions for this if they exist, so I do it
'right' I'm used to using Jira at work, but in my experience every
the ri command ( ri Kernel#raise in this case ) shows
-- Kernel#raise
raise
raise(string)
raise(exception [, string [, array]])
fail
fail(string)
fail(exception [, string [, array]])
Please do note that all of the examples you've found so far represent
correct Ruby code. In many cases with Ruby, parentheses are optional.
It might be best if you reported your findings to the Ruby in Steel
people so that they can fix their parser.
Bret
Bret Pettichord wrote:
Chuck vdL
Brett,
ACK I'm still at babysteps level of ruby coding and you're trying to
turn me into a contributor aren't you ;)
ok ok I'll read up on patches and such and see if I can manage to
submit something for this that doesn't totally screw up everything...
this is how it starts isn't it. how
On Dec 1, 12:14 pm, Bret Pettichord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please do note that all of the examples you've found so far represent
correct Ruby code. In many cases with Ruby, parentheses are optional.
It might be best if you reported your findings to the Ruby in Steel
people so that they can
My preferred ruby style is (1) not to include parentheses when they are
optional, and (2) not to pad them with extra spaces when they are used.
Bret
Chuck vdL wrote:
Brett,
ACK I'm still at babysteps level of ruby coding and you're trying to
turn me into a contributor aren't you ;)
ok
OK posted a message in the forums over at SapphireSteel regarding my
experience so far.
here's a link http://sapphiresteel.com/forum/index.php?topic=303.0
for any that are interested to follow along.
All in all I think if it will work, RubyInSteel could be a kick-ass
IDE for working with Ruby
12 matches
Mail list logo
