Hi
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Eoff, Ullysses A
ullysses.a.e...@intel.com wrote:
It was pointed out to me that I used C++ style comments... whoops, old habits.
Before I resubmit does anyone else see any other coding convention issues
that I missed or deviated from? Kristian?
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:13:45 -0700
U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com wrote:
From: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
Test surface pointer enter/leave/motion and surface leave/enter
events more aggressively.
Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
Hi Artie,
I wanted a way to run and test a recentish Wayland on plain DRM, but
without having to manually install anything. After all, I'd probably
want to update the whole stack too.
Should anyone else feel a similar need, I hereby offer my setup script
for public consumption. I took existing debian
Add THEME_FRAME_MAXIMIZED flag so the theming system can know not to draw
shadows for maximized windows. This allows maximized surfaces' content to be
sized and placed in a more expectable fashion.
---
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 06:16:14AM -0600, Scott Moreau wrote:
This effectively fixes a bug
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com
---
src/shell.c |7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/shell.c b/src/shell.c
index e2715d6..6193bd2 100644
--- a/src/shell.c
+++
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com
---
src/shell.c |7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/shell.c b/src/shell.c
index e2715d6..6193bd2 100644
--- a/src/shell.c
+++
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com
---
src/shell.c |7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/shell.c b/src/shell.c
index e2715d6..6193bd2 100644
--- a/src/shell.c
+++
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:38:52 -0600
Scott Moreau ore...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com
---
src/shell.c |7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:38:52 -0600
Scott Moreau ore...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com
---
src/shell.c |7
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:46:05 +0200
Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding regular mouse wheels, reading the documentation[0] I'm not
sure about the expected behavior and cannot test it my self yet due to
lack of hardware. Considering that REL_WHEEL/REL_HWEEL events are
grouped together
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:46:05 +0200
Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding regular mouse wheels, reading the documentation[0] I'm not
sure about the expected behavior and cannot test it my self yet due to
lack
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:30:18 +0200
Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an old discrete-stepped mouse wheel, it reports:
Event: time 1348834027.330811, type 2 (EV_REL), code 8 (REL_WHEEL), value 1
Event:
Ignore this patch... resubmitting as a series to address coding conventions.
U. Artie
-Original Message-
From: Eoff, Ullysses A
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 3:27 PM
To: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Eoff, Ullysses A
Subject: [PATCH] tests: test surface to/from global
Ignore this patch... resubmitting as a series to address coding conventions.
U. Artie
-Original Message-
From: Eoff, Ullysses A
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:09 PM
To: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Eoff, Ullysses A
Subject: [PATCH] tests: add button test
From: U.
-Original Message-
From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:31 PM
To: Eoff, Ullysses A
Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] event-test: more aggressive event testing
Hi
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:34 PM,
-Original Message-
From: Pekka Paalanen [mailto:ppaala...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:31 PM
To: Eoff, Ullysses A
Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] event-test: more aggressive event testing
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:13:45 -0700
U. Artie Eoff
This and the previous patch should fix:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54598
Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti tiago.vigna...@intel.com
---
man/weston.man | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/weston.man b/man/weston.man
index
It will use the stock 'x' cursor instead when the system cursors are not
provided.
Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti tiago.vigna...@intel.com
---
On my tree I've implemented a fallback on pre-made cursor for the left_ptr,
which is the only one being used there:
From: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
Add more tests to cover pointer move/enter/leave/button and surface
enter/leave events. Add tests to exercise surface to/from global functions.
This patch series is a resubmit of the following patches to address coding
convention feedback received
From: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
Test surface pointer enter/leave/motion and surface leave/enter
events more aggressively.
Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
---
tests/event-test.c | 302
tests/test-client.c
From: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
---
tests/Makefile.am | 5 +++-
tests/surface-global-test.c | 65 +
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644
From: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
---
tests/Makefile.am | 4 +-
tests/button-test.c | 138
tests/test-client.c | 15 ++
3 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam-xdg-support/+bug/894391
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote the package.
There was a FeatureFreeze Exception (FFe) and now it is in the repository.
$ sudo apt-get install libpam-xdg-support
Weston under X runs fine.
Hi. Some status update here.
On 09/13/2012 06:19 PM, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
Guys, here's the smoke signal for the new xwayland private protocol I've
been working on. There are about 30 commits on all the repositories; let
me know if there's a better way to organize this eventually:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:35:12AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
Hi,
The FOSDEM organizers have sent out a call for devrooms. FOSDEM this
year is on the weekend of the 2nd and 3rd of February 2013.
After the success of
Currently most applications are blissfully unaware of the concept of
gamma which affects pretty much all rendering operations. Resizing,
alpha-blending, blurring, anti-aliasing, etc. are all operations that
should be done on physical or linear luminance values. However if we
stored linear values
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:44:27 +0200
Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:35:12AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
Hi,
The FOSDEM organizers have sent out a call for devrooms. FOSDEM this
year is on
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:30:18 +0200
Jonas Ådahl jad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com
Also need to handle maximized-vertically and maximized-horizontally.
I know it isn't liked but I want to push my recommendation again:
The shell knows how thick the edges are of a window. This is the
shadows and *also* the part that you are removing for your maximized
decorations (please look
Actual rendering of window contents is not done by Wayland so it should
not effect this. However wayland and the shells do some compositing, and
gamma changes how any partially-transparent pixels work. In current
shells these are:
1. shadows, which are typically drawn by the client as
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:44:27PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
Final reminder: the deadline is tonight.
So far there are three speakers who lined up, and my feeling is that
Matthieu and Marc lined up just so that the deadline and requirement
will be met. So only a single person is
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Bill Spitzak spit...@gmail.com wrote:
Also need to handle maximized-vertically and maximized-horizontally.
I know it isn't liked but I want to push my recommendation again:
The shell knows how thick the edges are of a window. This is the shadows
and *also*
2012/9/28 David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com:
Hi Bill
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Bill Spitzak spit...@gmail.com wrote:
This sounds like a really good idea!
What are you doing about UTF-8? Any modern terminal better handle it and at
least display glyphs for every valid UTF-8
33 matches
Mail list logo
