On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 09:23:06 -0400
"Jasper St. Pierre" wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 07:30:25 -0400
> > "Jasper St. Pierre" wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Pekka Paalanen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:0
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 07:30:25 -0400
> "Jasper St. Pierre" wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:08:14 +0200
> > > Manuel Bachmann wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello everybody,
> > > >
>
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 07:30:25 -0400
"Jasper St. Pierre" wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:08:14 +0200
> > Manuel Bachmann wrote:
> >
> > > Hello everybody,
> > >
> > > I just updated the repo today (
> > >
> > https://github.com/Tarnyko/we
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:08:14 +0200
> Manuel Bachmann wrote:
>
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I just updated the repo today (
> >
> https://github.com/Tarnyko/weston-xdg_surface_present/commit/0aca29d4b6dbe10d5237aaf5f35f72d25db3ac30
> ).
> > T
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:08:14 +0200
Manuel Bachmann wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just updated the repo today (
> https://github.com/Tarnyko/weston-xdg_surface_present/commit/0aca29d4b6dbe10d5237aaf5f35f72d25db3ac30).
> The "xdg_surface_present()" request not accepts a timestamp (uint32_t type)
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:37 +0200
Manuel Bachmann wrote:
> Hi Jasper, Jason,
>
> "Agreed. Especially if you start an application, but it's slow to start,
> and you have typed into the current window or have navigated away from it
> since, you should get a popup instead of the window immediately
Hello everybody,
I just updated the repo today (
https://github.com/Tarnyko/weston-xdg_surface_present/commit/0aca29d4b6dbe10d5237aaf5f35f72d25db3ac30).
The "xdg_surface_present()" request not accepts a timestamp (uint32_t type)
as an additional parameter.
If different of 0, and it is the first t
On 07/29/2014 03:03 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
"Another question for Manuel: Does present() interact with the
surface commit? Should it?"
Not in a way that I know of. From a compositor point of view,
present() (when the user interacts to show) does only change the
surface wors
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Manuel Bachmann <
manuel.bachm...@open.eurogiciel.org> wrote:
> Hi Jasper, Jason,
>
> "Agreed. Especially if you start an application, but it's slow to start,
> and you have typed into the current window or have navigated away from it
> since, you should get a popu
Hi Jasper, Jason,
"Agreed. Especially if you start an application, but it's slow to start,
and you have typed into the current window or have navigated away from it
since, you should get a popup instead of the window immediately mapped.
This is known as "focus stealing prevention"."
Good point. I
Hi Bill,
"This is not controlled by a count, but by whether a window is already
visible or already in the notification state. Clients should be able to
send a lot of these in a row. They cannot reliably test if they are
invisible and send the request only then, as there is a race condition."
Than
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> On 07/29/2014 11:40 AM, Manuel Bachmann wrote:
>
> When creating a xdg_surface, the surface will not be mapped (i.e. shown)
>> by desktop-shell anymore. It will only be if xdg_surface_present() has
>> been called once.
>>
>
> There seems to
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> On 07/29/2014 11:40 AM, Manuel Bachmann wrote:
>
> When creating a xdg_surface, the surface will not be mapped (i.e. shown)
>> by desktop-shell anymore. It will only be if xdg_surface_present() has
>> been called once.
>>
>
> There seems to
On 07/29/2014 11:40 AM, Manuel Bachmann wrote:
When creating a xdg_surface, the surface will not be mapped (i.e. shown)
by desktop-shell anymore. It will only be if xdg_surface_present() has
been called once.
There seems to be a design goal in Wayland to prevent clients from
making surfaces t
Hi folks,
(This post follows a discussion which I will link at the end of the mail :
*)
I have been working on an implementation of xdg_surface_present() for some
time now ; here is a proposal with working code.
When creating a xdg_surface, the surface will not be mapped (i.e. shown) by
desktop-
15 matches
Mail list logo