On 05/03/2024 12:26, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:59:25 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 04/03/2024 15:50, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:51:52 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 04/03/2024 14:14, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:24:56 +
Terry Barnaby
On 08/03/2024 15:23, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 14:50:30 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 05/03/2024 12:26, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:59:25 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
...
I would have thought it better/more useful to have a Wayland API call
like
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 14:50:30 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
> On 05/03/2024 12:26, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:59:25 +
> > Terry Barnaby wrote:
> >
...
> >> I would have thought it better/more useful to have a Wayland API call
> >> like "stopCommiting" so that an
On 05/03/2024 12:26, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:59:25 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 04/03/2024 15:50, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:51:52 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 04/03/2024 14:14, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:24:56 +
Terry Barnaby
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:59:25 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
> On 04/03/2024 15:50, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:51:52 +
> > Terry Barnaby wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/03/2024 14:14, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:24:56 +
> >>> Terry Barnaby wrote:
> >>>
On 04/03/2024 15:50, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:51:52 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 04/03/2024 14:14, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:24:56 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 04/03/2024 09:41, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:12:10 +
Terry Barnaby
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:51:52 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
> On 04/03/2024 14:14, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:24:56 +
> > Terry Barnaby wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/03/2024 09:41, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:12:10 +
> >>> Terry Barnaby wrote:
> >>>
On 04/03/2024 14:14, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:24:56 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 04/03/2024 09:41, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:12:10 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
While I am trying to investigate my issue in the QtWayland arena via the
Qt Jira Bug
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:24:56 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
> On 04/03/2024 09:41, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:12:10 +
> > Terry Barnaby wrote:
> >
> >> While I am trying to investigate my issue in the QtWayland arena via the
> >> Qt Jira Bug system, I thought I would try
On 04/03/2024 09:41, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:12:10 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
While I am trying to investigate my issue in the QtWayland arena via the
Qt Jira Bug system, I thought I would try taking Qt out of the equation
to simplify the application a bit more to try and
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:12:10 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
> While I am trying to investigate my issue in the QtWayland arena via the
> Qt Jira Bug system, I thought I would try taking Qt out of the equation
> to simplify the application a bit more to try and gain some
> understanding of what is
While I am trying to investigate my issue in the QtWayland arena via the
Qt Jira Bug system, I thought I would try taking Qt out of the equation
to simplify the application a bit more to try and gain some
understanding of what is going on and how this should all work.
So I have created a pure
Hi Pekka,
Did you try making the "middle" QWidget *not* have a wl_surface of its
own?
Hack on Qt, then? Sorry, but I don't understand this insistence that
what sounds like a Qt bug must be workaround-able via Wayland.
Hmm, that does not sound right to me, but then again, I don't know Qt.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:04:28 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> Some questions below:
>
> Thanks
>
> Terry
> On 26/02/2024 15:56, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > Ok. What Wayland API requests cause a surface to actually be mapped
> >> (Sorry don't really know Wayland protocol) ?
> > Hi
Hi Pekka,
Some questions below:
Thanks
Terry
On 26/02/2024 15:56, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
Ok. What Wayland API requests cause a surface to actually be mapped
(Sorry don't really know Wayland protocol) ?
Hi Terry,
the basic protocol object is wl_surface. The wl_surface needs to be
given a
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:18:27 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> Thanks for the response. Notes below:
>
> Terry
>
> On 26/02/2024 13:28, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:04:30 +
> > Terry Barnaby wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have investigated a bit further. I
Hi Pekka,
Thanks for the response. Notes below:
Terry
On 26/02/2024 13:28, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:04:30 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hi,
I have investigated a bit further. I have built my own Weston server to
run under X11 on Fedora37 so I can add printf's and debug
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:04:30 +
Terry Barnaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have investigated a bit further. I have built my own Weston server to
> run under X11 on Fedora37 so I can add printf's and debug more easily
> than using a cross compiled iMX8mp target system etc. I added a new
> dsmc-shell
Hi,
I have investigated a bit further. I have built my own Weston server to
run under X11 on Fedora37 so I can add printf's and debug more easily
than using a cross compiled iMX8mp target system etc. I added a new
dsmc-shell to Weston which is identical to kiosk-shell (apart from
names) so I
Hi David,
Many thanks for the reply and the info on how to get the ID.
I have added a basic example with some debug output at:
https://portal.beam.ltd.uk/public//test016-qt6-video-example.tar.gz
If there are any ideas of things I could look at/investigate I am all ears!
In a previous email
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:14:11AM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> I have tried using "weston-debug scene-graph" and I am coming to the
> conclusion that qtwayland 6.5.0 is not really using native Wayland surfaces
> when Qt::WA_NativeWindow is used. From what I can see (and I could easily be
>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 6:15 AM Terry Barnaby wrote:
>I don't know how to determine the Wayland surface ID from a
> wl_surface pointer unfortunately to really check this.
wl_proxy_get_id(static_cast(myWlSurface));
> >> Possibly when QWidget is below in hierarcy to be a child of of a parent,
>
I have tried using "weston-debug scene-graph" and I am coming to the
conclusion that qtwayland 6.5.0 is not really using native Wayland
surfaces when Qt::WA_NativeWindow is used. From what I can see (and I
could easily be wrong) the Wayland protocol shows wl_surfaces being
created and two
Hi Marius,
Many thanks for the info.
Some notes/questions below:
Terry
On 22/02/2024 17:49, Marius Vlad wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 03:21:01PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hi,
We are developing a video processing system that runs on an NXP imx8
processor using a Yocto embedded Linux
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 03:21:01PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are developing a video processing system that runs on an NXP imx8
> processor using a Yocto embedded Linux system that has Qt6, GStreamer,
> Wayland and Weston.
>
> We are having a problem displaying the video stream
Hi,
We are developing a video processing system that runs on an NXP imx8
processor using a Yocto embedded Linux system that has Qt6, GStreamer,
Wayland and Weston.
We are having a problem displaying the video stream from GStreamer on a
QWidget. In the past we had this working with Qt5 and
26 matches
Mail list logo
