> Nice one, Matt.
>
Now't to do with me, James did it and sent the original post, I just
reviewed it accross a number of emails! :o)
Matt
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.386 / Virus Database: 218 - Release Date: 0
The site looks excellent... Love the venus fly trap!
OK, v. slow to download on the dialup modem (lament! WHEN are BT gonna
give us braoadband in our village) , but once it gets there, it's good, so
I'm not nitpicking... and the singles play OK on iTunes, and are definitely
worth the download tim
Hi Jon,
We discussed it before and you know my opinion on this project. In my opinion (I have
arguments as well) this project is an unfortunate attempt to extend MS presence
through Linux. And I don't think the Open Source community at large will adopt it
It's a "Trojan" horse:
"Jon HawortDavid
James, missing a couple of crucial things: DOCTYPE and meta for http-equiv.
andy
-Original Message-
From: James Jarvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Site Check Please - Audrey 2
Hi List
A bit of a per
How does one embed an object of type video/mpeg without specifying a
specific player?
?
TIA.
::
Howard Cheng
http://www.howcheng.com/ <-- NEW!
howcheng at ix dot netcom dot com
AIM: bennyphoebe
ICQ: 47319315
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
Is your server configured to parse SSI calls? If so, is it
configured to parse *all* files? Most servers that permit
SSI calls require the file's extension to be ".shtml" (or
".shtm" for a few.) Very few are configured to parse ".htm"
files. Check with your host provider if you are unsure.
Ch
The file extension should be .shtml (.shtm?)
Derek
- Original Message -
From: "Siobhan Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:02 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] includes
> Can anyone tell me why the includes aren't working on this page
>
> htt
Can anyone tell me why the includes aren't working on this page
http://www.odihpn.org/hpgdraft/revised/assessing.htm.
When it was on my harddrive I could see the include if I pulled up each page directly
but wouldn't be able to see it when I navigated to it. Now I can't see it at all on
this o
> Like the colours, love the mucis, when and where are they touring
^ WTF? keyboard dyslexia strikes again...
M :o)
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.386 / Virus Database: 21
OK,
Works fine in IE5.5, MP3s work without a hitch. Guess it's my fault for
running OSS on a closed system... ;o)
Layout, as I have said, is realy cool imho, I'm with the others and think
that the people running away is a great animation...
I'd still query the use of images as text purely beca
-Original Message-
From: James Jarvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> ...give me a bit of feedback.
>
> http://www.audrey2.co.uk
Jim,
Great looking site! I like the animated figures at the bottom moving away
from the man eating plant, simple but clever. The white text with brilliant
sorry, should have mentioned, Love the layout and the first 3 seconds
sounded good... :o)
Will try with IE and feedback in a bit
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 September 2002 16:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [w
Thanks Perry - perfect!
:o)
jac.
> If you have Photoshop it's really easy. I have version 5.5. Double click a
> color swatch in the tools bar to open the "color picker". Choose a color
or
> type in you CMYK values then click on "Custom". In this window you'll find
a
> drop down list with a numb
I am using the M$ grid control to execute a stored procedure to update the
database record for the item clicked. It works when the grid item is an
HREF to another page that runs the code... but when I want the grid to do an
I get an error that "bar" is undefined.
Is there a way I can pass this
Nice site. Good design and even balance. The site is a tad big for the
unlucky me on my lowly dial up connection. How about a low resolution
version?
You might want to work on your meta tags. Because your site is image
only, that presents itself as a particular challenge. I don't think you
w
FYI singles work okay in IE 5 real player... hey you guys are good!
On 12 Sep 2002 at 16:31, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
just tried a different track, it did it again... :o(
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 September 200
just tried a different track, it did it again... :o(
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 September 2002 16:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Site Check Please - Audrey 2
>
>
> it was all going so well until the
Jim,
Quite nice!
A couple of the thoughts:graphics easy inside ones (e.g. audreyIIwebhome_2nd.gif)
take a while to load on my machine (dedicated dsl) which means on a modem would be
really slow??? Also, what about alt tags?
The anime gif on the bottom of pages is really neat the first time but
it was all going so well until the MP3 crashed Mozilla... :o(
Out of interest, any particular reason why images are used instead of text?
On ADSL it flys, but on a dial-up it must be murder...
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: James Jarvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 September
Hi Peter,
> Web Services. Here you have to choose between .NET with C#
> on MS or Java on Linux/UNIX. And it will be a discrete choice
> â those environments are absolutely non-compatible.
Or .Net via Mono on Linux/UNIX, which recently got to the point of having an
implementation of C# that
Thank you,
You're a bloody star!
Apologies to Rudy for not reading your post properly, one of these days,
I'll get my brain tested so it works in co-ordination with everything
else... :o)
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Haworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 September 2002
Hi Matt,
> > wrap the form fields, which are inline elements, in a
>
> OK, changed the variable name and encapsulated the form
> inside tags
> but still get the following errors:
Wrap the form *fields*, not the form itself :-)
Currently you do something like
Change it to some
Hi List
A bit of a personal project for a new band based in Essex, Uk. Could you
have a quick look and give me a bit of feedback.
http://www.audrey2.co.uk
Many thanks,
Jim
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> And they want to give computers intelligence!!!
> Joseph
Yeah, but if that happens all the "intelligent" computers will remove
Windows from themselves and install Linux!
Dave
--
I agree! One step further, remove all Microsoft programs!
Jan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jdvisions.com
Web
Cheryl,
It's a good decision. IMHO, this is an "apple" and "orange" situation. There is no
possible way to achieve performance, scalability, and security on MS similar or even
close to UNIX/Linux environment. We are comparing two distinctly different operating
systems. Said so, I must admit my
OK, changed the variable name and encapsulated the form inside tags
but still get the following errors:
Line 27, column 42:
^
Error: element "form" not allowed here; possible cause is an inline element
containing a block-level element
Line 28,
This is the thing, there was a element, but it wouldn't validate that
either!
I'm going to try and change my variable names to see if that solves it, one
of the names of a field is "type", think that might be throwing it!
Thanks,
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: rudy [mailto:[EMAIL P
wrap the form fields, which are inline elements, in a
okay, you can also use a , but as a structural purist, i rarely use a
when a is better semantically suited to the task
rudy
http://rudy.ca/
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:
Hello!
Just out of interest, has anyone tried using a "" tag within xhtml
strict?
I'm trying to do it and getting the following error:
Line 27, column 23:
^
Error: element "select" not allowed here; possible cause is an inline
element containing a block-level ele
-Original Message-
From: Ingentus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> how do I find out the equivalent pantone number of a CYMK colour?
Hi Jac,
If you have Photoshop it's really easy. I have version 5.5. Double click a
color swatch in the tools bar to open the "color picker". Choose a color
Interesting that your colleague's W2K box has so many problems. Mine has
been running since April 2000. The only time it has been down since then
is when I've shut it down (occasionally bad storms cause power problems
beyond what my UPS can reasonably be expected to handle) and a few times
when I'
Hi everyone,
quick Q -
how do I find out the equivalent pantone number of a CYMK colour?
cheers & TIA
jac.
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change subscription set
Thx for that Matt.
I will press on slowly [ very slowly actually ], but time for me to go to
bed now, 0041 here and I sat up and watched all of the remembrance services
last night/morning so am about ready to crash!
but thanks again for that, v helpful in resolving some mental fog and
tarra
>I can start with the basics and more as I need and can comprehend.
>
> Problem is that I don't want to and haven't the time to be my own sysadmin
> person fulltime, so how easy is it to keep up with the "security" issues?
>
> Cannot many of them be dealt with by closing/blocking ports?
>
Yup, o
34 matches
Mail list logo
