Hi Dominique,
> So, I'm assuming that other people are using the
> same kind of dumb popup guards which block every
> new window. [...] Can I get some feedback as to
> how some of you are handling this?
The only truly safe way to avoid your popups being blocked is not to use
popups :-)
If you mu
Re Dominique's problem, wanting to open pages in a new window but being
blocked as if it were a popup..
I would add this to Jon's contribution - if you open your links in a new
named window using JavaScript, your original window should then be able to
check for the existence of the new window to s
Ok, I haven't really been following this thread, but mozilla's built in
pop up blocker doesn't stop pop ups generated from a link, only
*unrequested* pop ups, don't know about third party blockers though. I
personally hate going to a site that starts throwing new windows at me,
whether it's adv
_target is deprecated in CSS2. Which I suppose is a not very subtle way of
discouraging the use of popups. Similarly, the incorporation of event
handlers like onmousover etc into the browser discourages the over use of
javascript. Find a way to do it without js for accessibility and then you
don't
Dominique,
I haven't seen this option discussed on the thread. Talk with the IT folks.
Most pop-up products (homegrown or commercial) have some exception hot-key
installed into the programming. If they don't, that should be easily
configurable. If you are able to get the hot-key exception, post
Joseph wrote:
>Dominique,
>So the options narrow considerably; I take it frames are now frowned
on as being useful to achieve both the original window (in part at
least) and changing information.
Exactly, I used to have a frame buster for my home page, but now, our
university is developing a
I have a web page that is updated from time to time. I have had complaints
from some of my users that they were seeing old information. It turned out
to be a browser cache problem.
How can I make sure that a web page is abosolutly, positively NOT cached?
Any differences for IE/Netscape, etc.
TIA
For those that have a minute or two and are adventurous.
Out of curiosity I have been looking for the oldest colored animated website
still online.
After many months of searching...I do believe I found it.
http://rosecity.net/rush/cartoons/cartoon21.html
can you top this?
The WDVL D
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 20:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a web page that is updated from time to time. I have had complaints
> from some of my users that they were seeing old information. It turned out
> to be a browser cache problem.
>
> How can I make sure that a web page is abosolutly, po
> Any differences for IE/Netscape, etc.
It seems that there are some bug and tricks involved:
http://www.htmlgoodies.com/beyond/nocache.html
/steven
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How can I make sure that a web page is abosolutly, positively NOT cached?
TIA
The WDVL Discussion List from WD
In addition to Steven's comments you may this useful, although it is a while
since I looked at this:
Pragma no-cache meta tags are ignored by all browsers and Pragma no-cache
as a header is ignored by all server caching UNLESS you use https. It is an
https control only. IE5+ browsers (and NS6+ ?)
Does anyone know a bit about how Google works? If you do a search on
"renal australia", you get a listing on page 2 called "Amgen Australia/RSA
Renal Travel & Research Grants". This is our site. So far so good. But if
you click that link, it goes to a different page on the same site, the
applicatio
well this, according to my search is a page of :
www.renalsociety.org/
this has been posted before I think but have a read:
http://www.google.ca/webmasters/guidelines.html
if you are the renal society web developer change your meta tags/ page
title/headings...? if not a quick phone call to the so
had a look at the site: the Amgen link goes a page with Amgen in the title
BUT search engines will not make sense of pages that are so heavily loaded
with javascript! nor can they read images (NB no alt tags either)
at the least andshould be added and should be
reasonably descriptive, the ti
14 matches
Mail list logo
