I'm a fairly confident PHP/MySQL developer...
I know that I've not yet met a chanllenge I couldn't do (with some trial
and error).
So I'm working on my CV, and I'm very bad at technical 'bigging up
myself'.
I've built CMS's, admin tools, download capture and reporting systems that
talk to e
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the feedback. The td.middle and td.main are set to 80% in
all the pages so I am not sure why it is appearing odd on the About Us
page. I will try the 100% though.
The client really likes the background. I don't really like the idea of
brown, blue and yellow together but .
Riva,
The only differences between the pages that I can find are:
1.) The doctype lines are different, and
Pages with correct style:
About Us: (on two lines)
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
2.) the style tag is a bit
Hi Cheryl,
Thanks for pointing that out. Every time I ran my page through the
w3.org HTML checker it told me that my doctype was wrong and the
Folks,
I have a problem best illustrated in Netscape 7.1 on the PC in the following
example
http://aodhruadh.org/funding/lotto.php
As you can see, if you have that browser, the left menu panel and the
contents of the right column spill over the footer section.
Put baldly, is there a way to stop
Hewitt, Cheryl wrote:
2.) the style tag is a bit different, too.
Pages with correct style:
John Hughes wrote:
Folks,
I have a problem best illustrated in Netscape 7.1 on the PC in the following
example
John,
The problem's also there in FireFox and I'd dare say that it's probably
there in any standards compliant browser. The happy thing is that it's
an easy fix. You've got two floats
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone got any advise, about how to word what I've mentioned above...
to put it in the proper context...
Tristan,
I think the 'proper context' for what you're describing is a portfolio.
Something I've done in my CV is to have it describe my education and
experience
True. What I was trying to do was show her the only differences between
her pages. By 'pages with correct style' I was meaning the pages where
she like the way they were displaying vs the page that was causing
problems.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
Hewitt, Cheryl wrote:
True. What I was trying to do was show her the only differences between
her pages. By 'pages with correct style' I was meaning the pages where
she like the way they were displaying vs the page that was causing
problems.
Ah. Gotcha. Yes, well... Continue where you left off. *c
Hi everyone,
I have just started working on this site. It is an existing
design that needs some help. The table has a graphic that divides the sections.
When I first got the files, the graphic and table (grayed) scrolled across the
page and added a scroll bar at the bottom. What I am tr
I am not sure what you mean. My resolution is high but I don't see the
scroll bar across the bottom.Is it "Beginning Classes start..." part
of the page? What graphic are you trying to align?
Riva
debram wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have just started working on this site. It is an existing desi
It occurred to me that the *cough* thing could've been interpreted the
wrong way... I actually meant to poke fun at myself for not actually
looking at the page and just being a stickler on the validity of the
code. So I hope I've not put anyone off with my misguided attempt at
self-sarcasm.
-
Not at all. I understood it the way you meant it. :-)
Riva
Stephen Caudill wrote:
It occurred to me that the *cough* thing could've been interpreted the
wrong way... I actually meant to poke fun at myself for not actually
looking at the page and just being a stickler on the validity of the
code
Thank you, Riva. I was wondering if it was just me. (BTW, I don't get
scrollbars either.)
Debra, you need to be a little clearer about what it is you're after. First,
there is no "the" table. There are seven in total: one outer container table
for everything, one upper table containing two more
Can someone tell me why the following page doesn't work in IE, but
Firefox/Netscape works fine?
http://www.digitalmeca.com/ie_redirect.html
--
- Matt Crampton
Sr. Webtechnologist
Time Warner Inc.
aim:[ MattCCrampton ]
email:[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
The WDVL Discussion List from W
Try this http://www.google.com');">GOTO
GOOGLE
-Original Message-
From: Matt C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 22, 2005 3:17 PM
To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
Subject: [wdvltalk] Simple JS not working in IE
Can someone tell me why the following page doesn't work in IE, but
Firefox/
Matt,
You put the JavaScript in the href.
Try this...
http://www.google.com');">GOTO GOOGLE
- Todd
-Original Message-
From: Matt C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:17 PM
To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
Subject: [wdvltalk] Simple JS not working in IE
Can someon
The thing with using "#" is that if the page is scrolled, the hash symbol
will kick the user back up to the top of the page. Not the greatest user
experience :(
- Matt Crampton
Sr. Webtechnologist
Time Warner Inc.
aim:[ MattCCrampton ]
email:[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Li
That certainly seems to work fine. Is this a more standard way of
executing javascript from an anchor tag? I thought onClick was the
"right" way to do it, perhaps this is just an IE bug?
- Matt Crampton
Sr. Webtechnologist
Time Warner Inc.
aim:[ MattCCrampton ]
email:[ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This works for all the browsers.
-Original Message-
From: Matt C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 22, 2005 3:30 PM
To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
Subject: RE: [wdvltalk] Simple JS not working in IE
That certainly seems to work fine. Is this a more standard way of
executing javascri
Your link works (calls the redirect() function correctly with the URL) but
the function doesn't. No idea why!
Leaving that aside, to clear up any confusion about the link, usually you
would put "javascript:" in front of the JS code, i.e.
http://www.google.com');">
You can just put the JS in t
Stephen,
I could kiss your rosy red cheeks.
Thanks a million.
John.
> add "clear:both" to #footer. That's it.
>
> hth,
> Stephen
>
> • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM •
> To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> use the web interface
http://e-newslette
What's more interesting is, using href="javascript://" onclick="etc" works
fine for calling the function, yet the location.href="etc" doesn't work,
but when you call the function using href="javascript: redirect()" the
location.href=etc works fine. Really weird.
- Matt Crampton
Sr. Webtechnolo
My cheeks are duelly notified and shall henceforth be very wary of
you, Mr. Hughes. Very wary, indeed. :D
seriously though, glad to be of assistance!
ttfn,
Stephen
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:52:34 -, John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> I could kiss your rosy red cheeks.
>
I think what you're looking for is this:
http://www.google.com";
onclick="window.location=this.href;">Go to Google
This ensures that folks without JS enabled still get a functioning
link (the browser simply ignores the onclick) and folks with JS
enabled get the fancy JS version... But why? If yo
Erm,
> Just FYI:
...
> the pseudo-protocol is definitely *not* necessary from
> within an event handler such as "onclick"
Well.. OK Javascript is the default scripting language, so it's not actually
*necessary* any more than it's necessary to start a script with
I am using Mozilla, and I am getting a horizontal scrollbar.
I did look at the code "briefly", and couldn't find what might be
causing the problem, but I think the whole page is a mess of code.
There are many inner/outer tables which could be messing up the layout.
Have you tried to validate the
Matt, you're right, it doesn't work in IE. I'm wondering why you created
a javascript when you could do it this way:
http://www.google.com"; target="_blank">GOTO GOOGLE
that works.
hth
Jan
Matt C. wrote:
Can someone tell me why the following page doesn't work in IE, but
Firefox/Netscape works fi
This was more of an example of the bug I was seeing. In the actual
application I'm working on, I build a url using several JS vars, and then
redirect the browser to it.
- Matt Crampton
Sr. Webtechnologist
Time Warner Inc.
aim:[ MattCCrampton ]
email:[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
On Tue, 22 Mar
Target is part of the frameset doctype and is not part of the
specification. Under the current W3C standards opening a new page should be
done with javascript not target. While it works in a transitional doctype it
may not work with a strict one in newer browsers.
Cheryl D. Wise
Certified Profess
You're right Cheryl, I only use the transitional doctype.
Jan
Cheryl D Wise wrote:
Target is part of the frameset doctype and is not part of the
specification. Under the current W3C standards opening a new page should be
done with javascript not target. While it works in a transitional doctype it
Sorry for the muddy request. Scott you have nailed what I was looking at
with the structure of the page. I was trying to line up the menus and the
tan-brown-yellow-green-etc. horizontal rule.
My initial thought was to scrap what is there and start over.
Thank you for taking a look.
Deb
-Ori
Hi Riva,
Sorry I was not more precise in my question. Scott did a very good
evaluation of the problem.
Deb
-Original Message-
From: Portman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 8:53 AM
To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] Table
I am not sure what you m
I need to comunicate to a potential employer, that I have skills, and I'm
not afraid to use them, but what I've got at the mo, jsut says that I've
built a few systems...
Has anyone got any advise, about how to word what I've mentioned above...
to put it in the proper context...
Two things:
First,
Hi, Deb. I think you're correct in your assessment. From looking at the
code, it appears that someone used Dreamweaver's WYSIWYG table layout mode
for a "quick-and-dirty." The code's a mess (trying to visualize all those
nested tables from the code could give a person gastric spasms pretty
quic
Hi Jan,
Thank you for the response. As I stated in my response to Scott, that was my
initial thought to start over. I did try to validate the page and it does
not. No big surprise there. :-)
Deb
-Original Message-
From: jdmajor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:3
37 matches
Mail list logo
