On Saturday 04 June 2005 06:34 pm, you wrote:
> well I tend not to bother with pixel perfect anyway, considering the
> permutations that are available to the user these days, I am happy if the
> layouts don't break when they are zoomed to say 600%, but the practice
> discussed in the first article,
On Saturday 04 June 2005 06:34 pm, you wrote:
> well I tend not to bother with pixel perfect anyway, considering the
> permutations that are available to the user these days, I am happy if the
> layouts don't break when they are zoomed to say 600%, but the practice
> discussed in the first article,
RUSZ,ANDREW"
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 5:50 AM
Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] CSS "revisited"
: On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 17:23:17 +1200
: "michael ensor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > the practice of setting standard defaults in style
: >sheets is often recommended
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 17:23:17 +1200
"michael ensor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the practice of setting standard defaults in style
sheets is often recommended to avoid gotchas with
different browsers and it seems that it has been taken
to a whole new level, which is at least
worth a read, URI's
the practice of setting standard defaults in style sheets is often recommended
to avoid gotchas with
different browsers and it seems that it has been taken to a whole new level,
which is at least
worth a read, URI's to articles are listed in increasing order of complexity ):
http://www.clagnu
