On Saturday 04 June 2005 06:34 pm, you wrote:
well I tend not to bother with pixel perfect anyway, considering the
permutations that are available to the user these days, I am happy if the
layouts don't break when they are zoomed to say 600%, but the practice
discussed in the first article, I
On Saturday 04 June 2005 06:34 pm, you wrote:
well I tend not to bother with pixel perfect anyway, considering the
permutations that are available to the user these days, I am happy if the
layouts don't break when they are zoomed to say 600%, but the practice
discussed in the first article, I
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 17:23:17 +1200
michael ensor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the practice of setting standard defaults in style
sheets is often recommended to avoid gotchas with
different browsers and it seems that it has been taken
to a whole new level, which is at least
worth a read, URI's to
To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 5:50 AM
Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] CSS revisited
: On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 17:23:17 +1200
: michael ensor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: the practice of setting standard defaults in style
: sheets is often recommended to avoid gotchas with
: different
the practice of setting standard defaults in style sheets is often recommended
to avoid gotchas with
different browsers and it seems that it has been taken to a whole new level,
which is at least
worth a read, URI's to articles are listed in increasing order of complexity ):
