: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 6:30 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Abbreviation for javascript (??)
- Original Message -
From: jdmajor
If he can change it to vbscript, why couldn't he change it to:
a href=js:foo(bar);
Good question, but the answer is IE supports two client/server scripting
: Pau Garcia i Quiles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 6:42 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Abbreviation for javascript (??)
Maybe this (http://www.sitepoint.com/article/behaved-dhtml-case-study) can
help.
-- Original Message --
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Abbreviation for javascript (??)
Maybe this (http://www.sitepoint.com/article/behaved-dhtml-case-study) can
help.
-- Original Message --
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Abbreviation
:27 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Abbreviation for javascript (??)
What the article (which /is/ very good) is implying is that you should
be using event listenters rather than making a call to the javascript
protocol in the href attribute. In your instance, something like:
(given the following html
Scott,
So... you're trying to automagically regurgitate an app coded in
insert cryptic language here as html? Ermm... Don't AS/400's use
the DB2 database format? Why not build a web app? I understand that
that is what Web Options is supposed to be doing for you, but it
seems you'd be better
-
From: Stephen Caudill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 1:59 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Abbreviation for javascript (??)
Scott,
So... you're trying to automagically regurgitate an app coded in
insert cryptic language here as html? Ermm... Don't
Well, shit... I don't envy you.
Then again, if you saw the project I'm working on, I'd probably get
some sympathy from you too :^)
I guess in answer to your original question, there's no way to shorten
the call to the javascript protocol... OH HEY!!! DUH! How bout just
using the onclick
Bj,
If he can change it to vbscript, why couldn't he change it to:
a href=js:foo(bar);
Jan
Bj wrote:
If the only browser being used is Microsoft Internet Explorer, you could
rewrite the JavaScript functions in VBScript, then you could use
a href=vbscript:foo(bar);
The WDVL Discussion
- Original Message -
From: jdmajor
If he can change it to vbscript, why couldn't he change it to:
a href=js:foo(bar);
Good question, but the answer is IE supports two client/server scripting
languages by default, JScript (their implementation of the industry standard
ECMAScript
Maybe this (http://www.sitepoint.com/article/behaved-dhtml-case-study) can
help.
-- Original Message --
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Abbreviation for javascript (??)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:22:57 -0400
Don't
10 matches
Mail list logo
