ED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Site check please [http://suhamontaza-albreht.si/]
> hmmm aren't you using the funkcije.js to get the transitions?
> I couldn't even come close with:
> >
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/samples/aut
hmmm aren't you using the funkcije.js to get the transitions?
I couldn't even come close with:
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/samples/author/dhtml/DXTidemo/DXTidemo.htm
TIA, Gerrie
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
TED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:14 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Site check please [http://suhamontaza-albreht.si/]
Hi,
Just took a quick look (on IE6, win2k, T1): I like what you've done with
the images fading in and out, and the font is also a nice change from the
usual. Load times
Just took a quick look (on IE6, win2k, T1): I like what you've done with
the images fading in and out,
Me too! did you do that with java script?
//Gerrie
www.osthammar.info
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-
From: William Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 11:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Site Check Please [Rudy]
I know I'm coming into this late, but here is a statistic (not sure if it's
accurate or not) of the percentage of
From: William Stewart
>>> I know I'm coming into this late, but here is a statistic (not sure if
it's accurate or not) of the percentage of JavaScript users:
http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2003/December/javas.php <<<
Thanks for the info Will.
Perry Gerenday
http://www.webinitiative.net
Hi,
Just took a quick look (on IE6, win2k, T1): I like what you've done with
the images fading in and out, and the font is also a nice change from the
usual. Load times were fine. The front page seems a little bare to me,
though--I'd be in favor of more content, even if it meant making the phot
I know I'm coming into this late, but here is a statistic (not sure if
it's accurate or not) of the percentage of JavaScript users:
http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2003/December/javas.php
HTH,
Will
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[
> Hmmm. Rudy, my suggestion to you, as a user of the WWW,
[ SNIP A HUGE SOUR GRAPES SELF-JUSTIFICATION ]
don't shoot the messenger, my dear friend
you were kidding, right?
please, do yourself AND YOUR CLIENTS a favour -- do some more accessibility
research besides your brother and wife
e.g. ht
From: rudy
> the site is totally useless with javascript turned off
Hmmm. Rudy, my suggestion to you, as a user of the WWW, would be to stop
disabling features of your browser that were developed to enhance your
browsing experience. Then, as a developer, find a survey - or conduct one
yourself,
Preloading your NAV images would help lots.
Al
At 1/5/2004 01:32 PM, you wrote:
you wrote | -Original Message-
you wrote | From: Gerenday, Perry (P.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you wrote | Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:31 PM
you wrote | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you wrote | Subject: [wdvlta
A very soothing layout. Checked on both IE 6+ and Opera 7.10 -- looks
the same. Initially I thought there was some problem with the navigation
graphics because they blinked when I moved the cursor from one tab to
another, but later on workedfine.
Amrit
you wrote | -Original Message-
you
Hi,
I find that your links disappear when I rollover them. Looks great
otherwise.
:-)
Riva
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To set a personal password send an email to
All of my browsers must have decided to emulate
MSIE 6 because it looks the same in that
plus Mozilla, Firebird, and Netscape 7.1
Hover produces a little white
cloud around the link plus a tool tip title.
AuntySpam
http://www.pspug.org/edu/edu.shtml
http://www.geocities.com/brewnetty/
http://c
opps sorry it's back now... dunno, gremlins or something :o)
I like the look of it -
Wonky:
on mouseover the navigation vanishes
when I click on the invisible links I'm not taken anywhere (even though
I can see the address in the status bar)
hth
jac.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gere
:o)
I'm presuming you took the page down - I got a 404.
let us know when it's back up & running.
jac
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerenday, Perry (P.)
> Sent: 05 January 2004 17:01
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [wdvltalk] Site Check Please
>
>
> Hey everyone,
> I've been in lurk
Unfortunately, all kinds of problems.
In Opera 7.11 identifying as Opera and not MSIE, there is no styling at all.
Nor is there any for Firebird. That's the result of using javascript
sniffing. It doesn't work.
Drop the xml prolog, it only throws IE6 into quirks mode. Doesn't help at
all. Put the
> Please take a look and let me know if you see anything wonky.
>
> http://www.webinitiative.net/exchange_club/index.html
the site is totally useless with javascript turned off
harsh, i know, but dude, that is a consideration
so boo for using javascript to sniff my browser and then fail to deli
Diann
Win XP Pro, 800x600, 1024x768 NN7.2 IE6.0 DSL
;o) Well, the colors are green...you know what you need?
One of those animated images of a hula girl dancing, or..even
better, an animated image of Smokey the Bear with his head bobbing,
like those old time figures people put on th
Diann
Win XP Pro, 800x600, 1024x768 NN7.2 IE6.0 DSL
;o) Well, the colors are green...you know what you need? One
of those animated images of a hula girl dancing, or..even better,
an animated image of Smokey the Bear with his head bobbing, like those
old time figures people put on th
Check out how I've done it with JavaScript & PHP
on my site.
Scroll down to the very end and click on my email
address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Though it looks like a naked email address, if you
see the source, you'll see that it isn't.
Regards,
Ravi
http://WebmasterInABox.net
At 11:54 AM 6/26/03 -0700
> -Original Message-
> From: sherry young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I do have voice mail. That way I miss nothing. I have a dial
> up connection and live on the internet so people can at least
> have some hope of getting ahold of me. I prefer an answering
> machine but they all di
2002 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Site Check Please -
See below, if you're in the humour:
rudy wrote:
> i'm in total agreement about cell phones -- i still have a black
rotary
> phone
I always "please hold" whenever confronted with a voice menu.
> Flash, like css and images can be turned off by the user.
> Why would someone want to though?
> Is it because of the size?
yes, that is one (very valid) reason
granted, flash is relatively compact -- i would hate to see the size of an
equivalent animated gif, for instance
other reasons for tu
roadband land.
Kind regards,
/steven
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Site Check Please -
>
>
> Flash, like css and images can be
Stephen:
Interesting. How is it that you are logging whether your users have
flash enabled or not? Cookie? Otherwise? In either case, I think it
is safe to say that using flash for a text rollover effect is a bit
overkill.
Will:
Because my hoster gathers the statistics, I am not sure how the
, December 05, 2002 11:07 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Site Check Please -
> I know that prediction of Flash saturation is going to be an educated
> guess at best, but the statistics of my client's sites are that 95% of
> the visitors are Flash compliant. These sites attract thou
I would remind you, Jim, these are Macromedias figures derived from the total number
of flash players ever distributed combined with an independant companies assessment of
how many users are on the web. I truly dont believe saturation is over 60%. This is
not to say "don't use flash!", quite
Rudy:
jim, you did not specify what type of site check you wanted -- look &
feel,
usability, cross-browser robustness, quality of code, appropriateness to
target audience, adherence to w3 standards...
Me:
Rudy, you have been around on this list long enough to know that nobody,
and I mean nobody,
Hi Jim,
The design looks professional. That sedated look is perfect for
business related site. Good choice.
A few suggestions:
The popup is very annoying.
The quality of your jpegs is excessively low. The problem is apparent
at my monitor resolution of 1024x768. It will be worse looking to
James,
I must agree with Gerrie, the popup can get annoying. Were it not for the
onmouseover event on the image, it would be okay, but as it is I had the window pop
some 6 or 7 times before I figured out what not to do. Maybe this would be better
with an onload event or even setting a cookie
> www.sellfinancialservices.com
jim, you did not specify what type of site check you wanted -- look & feel,
usability, cross-browser robustness, quality of code, appropriateness to
target audience, adherence to w3 standards...
first (and biggest) thing i noticed was that you have text-as-image as
Uneventful?
-Original Message-
From: Gerrie Warner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2002 17:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Site Check Please -
Never did enjoy self-opening windows better to let the visitor open it
voluntarily.
A bit "uneventful&quo
Looks good on Mozilla 1.0.1 - the only thing I see is the kind of funky
date format: Wednesday, 4 December, 2002
Mignon
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 11:00, James Jarvis wrote:
> Hi Gang,
>
> Any chance you could spare a few minutes to have a look over this for me.
> Its a site for a magazine distribute
Never did enjoy self-opening windows better to let the visitor open it voluntarily.
A bit "uneventful" - even for such a serious client though?
/Gerrie
> www.sellfinancialservices.com
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
nts
who might be visually challenged.
Branding is important so when you look at your heading/title think
"corporate logo" type stuff - easily recognisable and readable!
hth
- Original Message -
From: "Benny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
- Original Message -
From: "Amrit Hallan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:07 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Site Check please
: Hello Benny.
:
: Animated heading. Slightly dark blue text over light blue
: background. Under
Hello Benny.
Animated heading. Slightly dark blue text over light blue
background. Underlined text that is not hyperlinked.
Sure-shot way
to send visitors away.
Amrit Hallan
¤¤
Web Site Development - http://www.bytesworth.com
Copywriting and Co
> Can you please check this site:
>
> www.weekendclimber.com
Scott--
Only could take a quick look as I'm under deadline for a few things.
I'm on WinMe/733MHz PIII/IE 6.0 on a DSL connection.
The yellow lettering on the left nav looks blurry to me -- mouseover red
text button looks okay. Video l
Hi Scott,
Interesting stuff! I have to agree with Brett, though, the yellow lettering is hard to
read
on my screen and I'm using IE5.
Siobhan
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:wdvltalk-join@;lists.wdvl.com
Send Your Posts To
The videos look good. The yellow lettering on the navigation is a little
too bright for me. I use NS 7.
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Scotty [mailto:wdvltalk@;weekendclimber.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Site Check Please!
Ca
Dear Jan (and others who helped me with the JS syntax)
Thank you thank you thank you!!
I had a quick look at the file you sent and it seemed to work exactly the
way I wanted it to.
I think I got all confused as I was looking at one thing, then another and
not realising I didnt have it all consis
Thanks for all the help everyone -- my pages now work -- but I havent yet
put them up because I have to change the other two and then make them into
templates so nothing more can be wrong with them
Javascript..a.. not my best friend!!
Jan - you are wonderful!!!
> -Original Message-
> From: astralgirl
> Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Site Check Please (www.missivemedia.com)
>
>
> thanks!! I just changed it to be right - i looked on w3c...
> >
> > You could start by properly placing your
should be:
And t
thanks!! I just changed it to be right - i looked on w3c...
- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Blair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 5:08 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Site Check Please (www.missivemedia.com)
&
to make it look
bigger but thanks anyway.
Jacquie
- Original Message -
From: "Don Kinney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:21 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Site Check Please
> Jacquie--
>
> (Y'know, I&#
t;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 6:13 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Site Check Please
> Thanks for the help about the drop down list size, guys
>
> I actually needed it to be bigger as in a bigger size, more height, rather
> than width.. but it&
s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:03 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Site Check Please
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 1:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jacquie:
>
> About the font, it's actually the drop-down list that I want to enl
.. but if I cant, then that is fine too, as it's okay.
Thanks again
Jacquie
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:13 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Site Check Please
> Hi Jacquie,
>
> Nice desig
Hi Jacquie,
Nice design on your site!
Your problem on the homepage is that you are calling an invalid
function. In the body tag you have: onload=askMe() . The function
askMe() is nonexistent. Remove the offending code ( askMe(); ),
making sure to keep the onload=, and everything should wor
> Nice one, Matt.
>
Now't to do with me, James did it and sent the original post, I just
reviewed it accross a number of emails! :o)
Matt
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.386 / Virus Database: 218 - Release Date: 0
2002 16:31
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Site Check Please - Audrey 2
>>
>>
>> just tried a different track, it did it again... :o(
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
>> > [mailto:[
James, missing a couple of crucial things: DOCTYPE and meta for http-equiv.
andy
-Original Message-
From: James Jarvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Site Check Please - Audrey 2
Hi List
A bit of a per
-Original Message-
From: James Jarvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> ...give me a bit of feedback.
>
> http://www.audrey2.co.uk
Jim,
Great looking site! I like the animated figures at the bottom moving away
from the man eating plant, simple but clever. The white text with brilliant
CTED]
> Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Site Check Please - Audrey 2
>
>
> just tried a different track, it did it again... :o(
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 12 September 2002 16:30
> >
Nice site. Good design and even balance. The site is a tad big for the
unlucky me on my lowly dial up connection. How about a low resolution
version?
You might want to work on your meta tags. Because your site is image
only, that presents itself as a particular challenge. I don't think you
w
12 September 2002 16:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Site Check Please - Audrey 2
>
>
> it was all going so well until the MP3 crashed Mozilla... :o(
>
> Out of interest, any particular reason why images are used
> instead of text?
> On ADSL it f
just tried a different track, it did it again... :o(
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 September 2002 16:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Site Check Please - Audrey 2
>
>
> it was
Jim,
Quite nice!
A couple of the thoughts:graphics easy inside ones (e.g. audreyIIwebhome_2nd.gif)
take a while to load on my machine (dedicated dsl) which means on a modem would be
really slow??? Also, what about alt tags?
The anime gif on the bottom of pages is really neat the first time but
it was all going so well until the MP3 crashed Mozilla... :o(
Out of interest, any particular reason why images are used instead of text?
On ADSL it flys, but on a dial-up it must be murder...
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: James Jarvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 September
Hi Patrick,
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 09:14:30 -0400, you wrote:
>A couple more to be changed:
>
>I get the following error when attempting to "List Books By"
>Author, Title , or Ref #:
>
>Warning: Failed opening '../navbar.inc' for inclusion
>(include_path='') in /home/ipbooks/public_html/books/bookl
Hi Gail,
You might want to consider fiddling with the resolution on some of your images (i.e.
Legacy management, contact details, the statement starting with your home is, and
quotes) as they are quite rough. You might even want to consider making the text text
siobhan
On 31 Jul 2002 at 9:00, G
Gail,
I'm no web developer either! Also learning from this excellent list to try
to make a decent site.
I support JP's comment on button text colours - very difficult to read;
white might work well, though.
Couldn't take time to go into the site just now, but what I liked very much
on homepag
Hi Gail,
Just quickly -
Great effort
The poor
* the contrast between your navigation buttons is not enough - dark green on
another shade of green makes them hard to read.
* some of your pics the resolution is really poor - watch your compression
and do not get too compression happy.
* you lose th
64 matches
Mail list logo
