Hi there Jac
You'll be glad to know there is no error with your page
The footer table really is expanding to 100%
The 100% refers to the visible screen, NOT the width of the Web page...
so if the rest of your page goes past the right hand edge of the screen,
that has gone over 100%, but the
yeah but Erik shouldn't it stretch to fit whatever the width of the
screen is? or have i got it wrong yet again??
Ok, I take that back. the 100% does go to 800 in 800x600
mode, it fills the
screen, to 800, however is 52 pixels less than the table
above. it's the
table above that is
thanks Bj I was thinkign I'd have to resort to using the 1px gif if i
couldn't figure it out but I was convinced it should have stretched.
getting late here I'm sick to my teeth of websites :o) why can't I win
the lotto retire to Malta instead??
Hi there Jac
You'll be glad to know there
I'm looking at the table above the footer, it has graphics in it, which are
forcing your table to be wider than 800
Erik
-Original Message-
From: jac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 7:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Table question
yeah
Jac
Ok, I've viewed the page with Moz. and IE and I can't understand
the problem. If you're talking about the fr_white_body_bg.gif
it's not showing because when I viewed the above image on your site, it
only showed (can't see white on white) white, and about 12 lines down
I saw a very small -
thanks Jan Erik but I know what I have to do now to resolve it (thanks
Bj)... call on the 1px gif to sort out the layout.
thanks again for your help.
jac.
Jac
Ok, I've viewed the page with Moz. and IE and I can't understand
the problem. If you're talking about the fr_white_body_bg.gif
Good to know you got it sorted jac, but what the bloody hell are you of all
people doing using tables in the first place?!?
Sorry it's 4.24am and this flu is driving me mad...
MOU
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOh!!! light goes on I had that page filed in a folder called test.
The page seems to work anyway. Do you think I should go back and delete those
../s??? Or would that just be an exercise in obsessiveness. NOT that I'd ever be
obsessive, oh no, not me...
Thanks. That helps a lot.
At 2:21 PM -0500 3/11/02, sherry young wrote:
OOh!!! light goes on
/me puts on his sunnies
I had that page filed in a folder called test.
The page seems to work anyway. Do you think I should go back and delete those
../s???
er - now you are confusing me :) If it works while it
Sherry,
You're right that it does look different in NN 4.x which I didn't check
in since I absolutely hate that browser and will be glad when it is no
longer even an after though to web design.
I did check it in NN 6.2 Mozilla which are much more standards
compliant. To fix what I originally
Sherry,
When I originally looked through your code it was full of empty font
tags, font tags inside of font tags that had no content in-between the
tags and were redundant. That alone is one good reason for learning CSS.
I set fonts once in css then forget about it. If I want a different font
for
Welcome back duck lady
your standard html tag for images is align=bottom|middle|top|left|right,
using another align tag in the cell will probably muck that up.
If you wanted to use CSS ( the align tag is deprecated) you could create a
division for the images and use the float property,
12 matches
Mail list logo
