Re: [Web-SIG] Proposal: Avoiding Serialization When Stacking Middleware

2007-03-06 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 09:43 PM 3/6/2007 -0600, Ian Bicking wrote: >Phillip J. Eby wrote: >>The wrapper (as with the wsgi "file wrapper") simply puts a WSGI face on >>a non-WSGI result body, converting it to an iterator of strings, and >>holding other attributes known to the middleware or other application object. >

Re: [Web-SIG] Proposal: Avoiding Serialization When Stacking Middleware

2007-03-06 Thread Ian Bicking
Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 08:08 PM 3/6/2007 -0600, Ian Bicking wrote: >> Posted here: http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications/avoiding_serialization >> >> Text copied below for discussion: >> >> >> :Title: Avoiding Serialization When Stacking Middleware >> :Author: Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> :

Re: [Web-SIG] Proposal: Avoiding Serialization When Stacking Middleware

2007-03-06 Thread Robert Brewer
Ian Bicking wrote: > This proposal gives a strategy for avoiding unnecessary > serialization and deserialization of request and response > bodies. It does so by attaching attributes to ``wsgi.input`` > and the ``app_iter``, as well as a new environment key > ``x-wsgiorg.want_parsed_response``. >

Re: [Web-SIG] Proposal: Avoiding Serialization When Stacking Middleware

2007-03-06 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 08:08 PM 3/6/2007 -0600, Ian Bicking wrote: >Posted here: http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications/avoiding_serialization > >Text copied below for discussion: > > >:Title: Avoiding Serialization When Stacking Middleware >:Author: Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >:Discussions-To: Python Web-SIG >:Sta

[Web-SIG] Proposal: Avoiding Serialization When Stacking Middleware

2007-03-06 Thread Ian Bicking
Posted here: http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications/avoiding_serialization Text copied below for discussion: :Title: Avoiding Serialization When Stacking Middleware :Author: Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :Discussions-To: Python Web-SIG :Status: Proposed :Created: 06-03-2007 .. contents:: Abstr

Re: [Web-SIG] [Proposal] "website" and first-level conf

2007-03-06 Thread Chris Withers
Jim Fulton wrote: > On Mar 3, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Chad Whitacre wrote: > ... >> Now, Jim: it looks like Zope still uses a Unix-y userland for >> INSTANCE_HOME, yes? > > Yes, but I hate it. At Zope Corporation, We're moving away from it > for a number of reasons. I actually like it a lot, still,

Re: [Web-SIG] The importance of deploying Python-based web apps on Windows (was: Re: [Proposal] "website" and first-level conf)

2007-03-06 Thread Chris Withers
Sidnei da Silva wrote: > I seriously hope you are kidding. > > Unfortunately that's not possible. A lot of people, specially when > evaluating open-source projects, have their first contact with the > software through the Windows platform. To quote some numbers, the > Plone Installer for Windows h