Re: [Web-SIG] WebOb

2007-10-22 Thread Jacob Smullyan
initialization? (Well, there isn't much initialization necessary, I suppose.) Not having to refer to things at times you you don't care about them is an architectural good which offsets to some degree the clumsiness of having two closely related things ra

Re: [Web-SIG] [Proposal] "website" and first-level conf (was: more comments on Paste Deploy)

2007-03-05 Thread Jacob Smullyan
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:25:06PM -0300, Sidnei da Silva wrote: > Well, it is something that needs to be considered though. We can't > just close one eye and pretend that win32 does not exist. Yes, I prefer to close two eyes! -- Jac

Re: [Web-SIG] html-gen-ish libraries; what's best?

2006-04-04 Thread Jacob Smullyan
like Python, and not override access syntax to do mutation, etc., so that mixing the syntax with Python will be natural, legible, and free from cognitive dissonance. Cheers, js -- Jacob Smullyan pgphXpZQPA0Ie.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ W

Re: [Web-SIG] Bowing out (was Re: A trivial template API counter-proposal)

2006-02-07 Thread Jacob Smullyan
oller framework, with active pages as a fallback. But for that purpose -- for little content-oriented crusts left out of the application -- active pages sure come in handy, so giving them some extra consideration here is probably still worthwhile. -- Jacob Smullyan pgpz3bA0EYtsG.pgp Descr

Re: [Web-SIG] Daemon server management

2005-06-10 Thread Jacob Smullyan
like how Apache works now, since they've combined httpd and > apachectl, but I'm not sure how easy it would be for me to discover the > particulars. The 2.0 source intimidates me a bit, because of the growth of the codebase, apr, and the various worker modules. The 1.3 sour

Re: [Web-SIG] Daemon server management

2005-06-09 Thread Jacob Smullyan
ors do not relish constantly having to write special wrappers for non-standard daemons. My two cents, anyway. Cheers, j -- Jacob Smullyan pgpTl3U9q9E76.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python

Re: [Web-SIG] Re: Preferred set of WSGI servers

2005-04-29 Thread Jacob Smullyan
when they might want to use > other deployment strategies (which is a rather complex discussion > really, that would be better avoided by providing one really good > strategy and telling everyone to use it). Why prefer forking to threads in this case?

Re: [Web-SIG] Preferred set of WSGI servers

2005-04-28 Thread Jacob Smullyan
generic jobs of speaking a lingo, and associate each lingo-job with a list of socket addresses; that addresses the first point, too. Cheers, js -- Jacob Smullyan pgpDoNNm1ijM6.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Web-SIG mailing list Web