Re: [Web-SIG] A Python Web Application Package and Format

2011-04-10 Thread James Mills
+1 too. I would however like to see this idea developed in a generic and useable way. ie: No zope/twisted deps or making it fit around Django :) Ideally it should be useable by the most basic (plain old WSGI). cheers James -- -- James Mills -- -- Problems are solved by method

Re: [Web-SIG] A Python Web Application Package and Format

2011-04-10 Thread James Mills
-web) networked applications is a design goal. Good :) cheers James -- -- James Mills -- -- Problems are solved by method ___ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman

[Web-SIG] Python WebSockets Server with circuits

2011-02-26 Thread James Mills
Hi all, Just wanted to share my implementation of a Python WebSockets Server (using the circuits framework): http://prologic.shortcircuit.net.au/Blog/2011-02-27-09.50 Enjoy! cheers James -- -- James Mills -- -- Problems are solved by method ___ Web

Re: [Web-SIG] Extracting web data

2011-02-21 Thread James Mills
again, thank you very much for the time you have given. You might want to look into using either the lxml or BeautifulSoup modules. cheers James -- -- James Mills -- -- Problems are solved by method ___ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG

Re: [Web-SIG] PEP 444 (aka Web3)

2010-09-16 Thread James Mills
) cheers James -- -- James Mills -- -- Problems are solved by method ___ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Web-SIG] PEP 444 (aka Web3)

2010-09-15 Thread James Mills
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Massimo Di Pierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: I fully support it! I don't entirely. I don't quite agree with the key changes from wsgi to web3. I think it's unnecessary. cheers james -- -- James Mills -- -- Problems are solved by method

Re: [Web-SIG] [Python-Dev] Add PEP 444, Python Web3 Interface.

2010-09-15 Thread James Mills
is probably okay (when it used to be an int). Can't comment on byte ordering, or format, etc... Perhaps SERVER_PORT should be left as it was in the original PEP 333 specs as an int (or None?) cheers James -- -- James Mills -- -- Problems are solved by method

Re: [Web-SIG] [Python-Dev] Add PEP 444, Python Web3 Interface.

2010-09-15 Thread James Mills
the numerical port (tcp) then I support this. In the case of unix sockets it could be a null byte string, eg: b cheers james -- -- James Mills -- -- Problems are solved by method ___ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs