On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Armin Ronacher
armin.ronac...@active-4.com wrote:
Hi,
On 9/16/10 2:38 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
True... I don't know what's the best option here.. I guess we need to
provide all children
Phillip wrote:
At 04:50 PM 12/19/2006 -0800, Jason Kirtland wrote:
What would a server do with an absolute URI vs. abs_path, if not
place it in PATH_INFO? Or '*', for that matter?
My understanding is that an absolute URI is equivalent to issuing
the same request with e.g. a 'Host:' header
Ian wrote:
Reading the CGI spec I'm noticing some requirements it makes that
aren't done as much in WSGI.
[...]
It's also unclear if the WSGI server is expected to normalize the
path, specifically things like /foo/../bar -- Apache does do
this, wsgiref does not.
The spec could definitely
Phillip wrote:
At 03:36 PM 12/19/2006 -0800, Jason Kirtland wrote:
To my reading, PEP 333 implies that a server should plop the
Request-URI into PATH_INFO, and it should store it there
unmolested.
That's only the case if the address of the application is the
root of the server
