Re: [Web-SIG] [Python-Dev] Backup plan: WSGI 1 Addenda and wsgiref update for Py3

2010-09-21 Thread Ian Bicking
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 12:09 -0400, P.J. Eby wrote: > > While the Web-SIG is trying to hash out PEP 444, I thought it would > > be a good idea to have a backup plan that would allow the Python 3 > > stdlib to move forward, without needing

Re: [Web-SIG] [Python-Dev] Backup plan: WSGI 1 Addenda and wsgiref update for Py3

2010-09-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Chris McDonough wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 12:09 -0400, P.J. Eby wrote: > If a WSGI-1-compatible protocol seems more sensible to folks, I'm > personally happy to defer discussion on PEP 444 or any other > backwards-incompatible proposal. I think both make sen

Re: [Web-SIG] [Python-Dev] Backup plan: WSGI 1 Addenda and wsgiref update for Py3

2010-09-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Ian Bicking wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:09 PM, P.J. Eby wrote: >> >> The Python 3 specific changes are to use: >> >> * ``bytes`` for I/O streams in both directions >> * ``str`` for environ keys and values >> * ``bytes`` for arguments to start_response() a

Re: [Web-SIG] [Python-Dev] Backup plan: WSGI 1 Addenda and wsgiref update for Py3

2010-09-21 Thread P.J. Eby
At 12:55 PM 9/21/2010 -0400, Ian Bicking wrote: On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com> wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 12:09 -0400, P.J. Eby wrote: > While the Web-SIG is trying to hash out PEP 444, I thought it would > be a good idea to have a

Re: [Web-SIG] [Python-Dev] Backup plan: WSGI 1 Addenda and wsgiref update for Py3

2010-09-21 Thread P.J. Eby
At 06:52 PM 9/21/2010 +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote: On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:09:44 -0400 "P.J. Eby" wrote: > While the Web-SIG is trying to hash out PEP 444, I thought it would > be a good idea to have a backup plan that would allow the Python 3 > stdlib to move forward, without needing a major new