We need to make a revision to the WSGI spec to say that
environ['wsgi.input'].readline takes an optional size argument. It
always does in practice (except in wsgiref.validate.validator, rendering
that validator useless), and is required to in practice, because
everyone uses cgi.FieldStorage, a
2008/11/16 Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We need to make a revision to the WSGI spec to say that
> environ['wsgi.input'].readline takes an optional size argument. It always
> does in practice (except in wsgiref.validate.validator, rendering that
> validator useless), and is required to in pra
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2008/11/16 Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
We need to make a revision to the WSGI spec to say that
environ['wsgi.input'].readline takes an optional size argument. It always
does in practice (except in wsgiref.validate.validator, rendering that
validator useless), and is
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:web-sig-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Bicking
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 10:06 AM
> To: Graham Dumpleton
> Cc: Web SIG
> Subject: Re: [Web-SIG] Revising environ['wsgi.input'].readl
Ian Bicking wrote:
To resolve this, let's just not pass it over this time?
+1
--
And Clover
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.doxdesk.com/
___
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http:/
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Andrew Clover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Bicking wrote:
>
>> To resolve this, let's just not pass it over this time?
Totally agreed.
What exactly needs to happen next?
___
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
W
Mark Ramm wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Andrew Clover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Bicking wrote:
To resolve this, let's just not pass it over this time?
Totally agreed.
What exactly needs to happen next?
We need to propose a change to the WSGI specification. I propose, in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Bicking wrote:
> Mark Ramm wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Andrew Clover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Ian Bicking wrote:
>>>
To resolve this, let's just not pass it over this time?
>> Totally agreed.
>>
>> What exactly needs to h
Ian Bicking ha scritto:
[...]
We need to propose a change to the WSGI specification. I propose, in
"Input and Error Streams"
(http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/#input-and-error-streams) we
change it to have "readline(hint)" and expand Note 3 to include readline
as well as readlines, re
Manlio Perillo wrote:
Ian Bicking ha scritto:
[...]
We need to propose a change to the WSGI specification. I propose, in
"Input and Error Streams"
(http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/#input-and-error-streams) we
change it to have "readline(hint)" and expand Note 3 to include
readline a
At 08:49 PM 11/17/2008 +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote:
Ian Bicking ha scritto:
[...]
We need to propose a change to the WSGI specification. I propose,
in "Input and Error Streams"
(http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/#input-and-error-streams)
we change it to have "readline(hint)" and expand
Ian Bicking wrote:
> Manlio Perillo wrote:
> > Ian Bicking ha scritto:
> >> [...]
> >> We need to propose a change to the WSGI specification. I propose,
> in
> >> "Input and Error Streams"
> >> (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/#input-and-error-streams)
> we
> >> change it to have "readline
Phillip J. Eby ha scritto:
At 08:49 PM 11/17/2008 +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote:
Ian Bicking ha scritto:
[...]
We need to propose a change to the WSGI specification. I propose, in
"Input and Error Streams"
(http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/#input-and-error-streams) we
change it to have
Ian Bicking ha scritto:
[...]
Fine for me, but of course we need to do this as:
1) Errata to WSGI 1.0
or
2) WSGI 1.1
or
3) WSGI 2.0
You can't just modify the current WSGI 1.0 spec.
I'm for 2), with the other clarifications about WSGI we have discussed
in the past.
I'm for 1. What other cla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manlio Perillo wrote:
> Phillip J. Eby ha scritto:
>> At 08:49 PM 11/17/2008 +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>>> Ian Bicking ha scritto:
[...]
We need to propose a change to the WSGI specification. I propose, in
"Input and Error Streams"
2008/11/18 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Manlio Perillo wrote:
>> Phillip J. Eby ha scritto:
>>> At 08:49 PM 11/17/2008 +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote:
Ian Bicking ha scritto:
> [...]
> We need to propose a change to the WSGI specif
[Graham]
> I would be for (1) errata or amendment as reality is that there is
> probably no WSGI implementation that disallows an argument to
> readline() given that certain Python code such as cgi.FieldStorage
> wouldn't work otherwise.
>
> For such a clarification on existing practice, I see no p
At 09:30 AM 11/18/2008 +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
I would be for (1) errata or amendment as reality is that there is
probably no WSGI implementation that disallows an argument to
readline() given that certain Python code such as cgi.FieldStorage
wouldn't work otherwise.
Please note that tha
18 matches
Mail list logo
