trying web2py starter on michael beller github, it's cool
is it going to embed in next web2py version? as an alternative scaffolding
apps maybe.
another things is i think the MENU() and auth.navbar() is implicit that
makes hard for developer to modify it, just a suggestion why not make MENU
and
On Sunday, October 1, 2017 at 10:22:32 AM UTC-7, greenpoise wrote:
>
> Ill post one now:
>
> https://www.udemy.com/the-build-a-saas-app-with-flask-course/
>
> On Scotch there is also a few very good ones complete tutorials
>
Is that one provided by the flask core developers?
Also, Michael
I think maybe I didnt explain myself correctly. Massimo posted "we are
thinking were do we go from here". No doubt Web2py is the easiest but how
far can we go with it? yes, I bet you you can do anything that flask does.
Now, are the resources out there accessible? are the examples outdated? in
When I was looking for an easy to learn framework for building a web
application, I tried some: Django, Flask, Pyramid and so on. As I had very
limited time to invest, I found that the one that was best explained was
web2py.
I saw the Massimo's videos and all was so easy and clear. I wasn't
Ill post one now:
https://www.udemy.com/the-build-a-saas-app-with-flask-course/
On Scotch there is also a few very good ones complete tutorials
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
-
Can you provide a few examples of things you can find howto for Flask and
not for web2py? I am curious.
On Wednesday, 27 September 2017 17:13:59 UTC-5, greenpoise wrote:
>
> To me and this is my opinion only, I have followed web2py for as long as I
> can remember. The difference between web2py
To me and this is my opinion only, I have followed web2py for as long as I
can remember. The difference between web2py and flask or even web2py and
ruby (just to name another framework/language) is that web2py examples are
outdated and very limited. I am able to find more updated tutorials on
I second what Anthony said. There are less commits because the code is
solid and grew up to be quite complex. Also we are thinking about where to
go from here.
On Monday, 11 September 2017 06:48:50 UTC-5, Anthony wrote:
>
> On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 2:46:17 AM UTC-4, Arnab Dutta wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 2:46:17 AM UTC-4, Arnab Dutta wrote:
>
> Thanks Anthony, just what I wanted to know whether the framework and
> community is still active as I am building some internal tools for my
> company on web2py. Most of te tutorials and documents were from 2016 and
>
Thanks Anthony, just what I wanted to know whether the framework and community
is still active as I am building some internal tools for my company on web2py.
Most of te tutorials and documents were from 2016 and before so wasn't sure how
active the framework was when compared to te likes of
Not sure what you mean. We just had a major release in July (v2.15), with a
few quick minor follow-ups (the most recent only 9 days ago). And 2.16 beta
is already available on Github.
If you look at the web2py and pyDAL repositories, you will see there has
been a good amount of development
11 matches
Mail list logo
