[web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-09-23 Thread mdipierro
I just posted today a fix to gluon/contrib/login_methods/cas_auth.py that works out of the box with Auth. That means you do not need to move cas.py into the models folder. Instructions are in gluon/contrib/login_methods/cas_auth.py On Sep 19, 10:14 pm, KMax wrote: > I guess, this is still actua

[web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-09-23 Thread KMax
reminding if actual > On 17 авг, 05:34, mdipierro wrote: This should be easy to do. I am traveling this week but I can do it the next. Please remind me.

Re: [web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-09-20 Thread hamid lover
un sabscrim On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:14 AM, KMax wrote: > I guess, this is still actual. > And some thought on profile remove feature. > If some posts or any other records are referenced to the profile, is > it good idea to drop them in cascade? I guess not. The obly way is > mark profile as r

[web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-09-20 Thread hcvst
Sounds reasonable, but would I need to worry about the cascade attribute? In a CMS, I would hate to suddenly loose existing content that's tied to a user id if the user decides to retire his profile. =HC On Sep 20, 5:14 am, KMax wrote: > I guess, this is still actual. > And some thought on profi

[web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-09-19 Thread KMax
I guess, this is still actual. And some thought on profile remove feature. If some posts or any other records are referenced to the profile, is it good idea to drop them in cascade? I guess not. The obly way is mark profile as removed (or might empty all fields), and process this flag in app. Cros

[web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-08-16 Thread mdipierro
I understand now. > This action is like "completly remove my account from the website" ==> > the opposite of "register". This should be easy to do. I am traveling this week but I can do it the next. Please remind me.

[web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-08-16 Thread Tim Michelsen
> 1) profile removal > > unless I misunderstood you can do > >auth.settings.actions_disabled.append('profile') Sorry, there is amisunderstanding: I would like to provide the user a option to completely remove his entry (identity) from the application (remove the corresponding entry from the

[web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-08-16 Thread mdipierro
1) profile removal unless I misunderstood you can do auth.settings.actions_disabled.append('profile') 2) federated authentication. there is one way you can do it. a) have multiple apps share the same database for auth and access eah othe session with session.connect(request,response,app

[web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-08-16 Thread Martin.Mulone
I like some of the ideas. +1 from me On Aug 15, 1:29 pm, Tim Michelsen wrote: > Hello, > I recently checked out two sites created by Lasiaf using Basic > authetication and Google authentication; I also just checked out the > default welcome app. > > I miss the following features in the authentica

[web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-08-16 Thread Timmie
Hello massimo, do you have any opinion about this? Suggestions? Thanks and have a nice week.

[web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-08-15 Thread Lasiaf
I like the deactivate account idea. It would be nice for it to be built in. On Aug 15, 11:13 am, Tim Michelsen wrote: > The register for could also benefit from a password strength checker.

[web2py] Re: Suggestions for the Basic Authentications

2010-08-15 Thread Tim Michelsen
The register for could also benefit from a password strength checker.