Re: [web2py] Re: Thinking of building a bug tracker...

I am pretty sure those things are pretty easy to implement... Why not just add them in the issue on google code and if someone has time he could just work on it. Massimo can't support all the app he create to show us the way to go and ask for poeple to take "paternity" of project to make sure the

Re: [web2py] Re: Thinking of building a bug tracker...

It's got a lot more issues than that. It's pretty unusable at the moment. After you get it working, then you have to assign projects to people via ID number, and vice versa. You have to edit the database to get all new people loaded into the system (ie - there is no custom admin module to promot

Re: [web2py] Re: Thinking of building a bug tracker...

Issue 3 :App is broken Richard On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Richard Vézina wrote: > Hello, > > Here a patch for web2py_issuetracker... > I didn't read the whole app, so I hope it still works as intended. > > > # HG changeset

Re: [web2py] Re: Thinking of building a bug tracker...

Hello, Here a patch for web2py_issuetracker... I didn't read the whole app, so I hope it still works as intended. # HG changeset patch # User Richard Vézina # Date 1341502246 14400 # Node ID d4a6372008825fa571f3f7b021b3e79fab7e7df4 # Parent e4535bcdef395d6e8b1f777e8466e1fc74a2d0d1 Fix not work

Re: [web2py] Re: Thinking of building a bug tracker...

Yes, that's one of Julio's, creator of http://www.qa-stack.com/ and http://pyforum.org/. All three are listed on the Powered By site. Anthony On Saturday, June 2, 2012 3:13:40 PM UTC-4, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > I had not seen it. Looks really slick. > > On Friday, 1 June 2012 23:49:31 UTC-5,

Re: [web2py] Re: Thinking of building a bug tracker...

I had not seen it. Looks really slick. On Friday, 1 June 2012 23:49:31 UTC-5, Bruce Wade wrote: > > i-track is the winner I already have it integrated into my project and > will build off of it. > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Bruce Wade wrote: > >> issue tracker there is an error when you c

Re: [web2py] Re: Thinking of building a bug tracker...

i-track is the winner I already have it integrated into my project and will build off of it. On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Bruce Wade wrote: > issue tracker there is an error when you click on projects on the demo not > a good example :D > i-track looks like a very good starting point if we wa

Re: [web2py] Re: Thinking of building a bug tracker...

issue tracker there is an error when you click on projects on the demo not a good example :D i-track looks like a very good starting point if we want to build of an existing product. On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Jason (spot) Brower wrote: > issue tracker I know of... > I am looking at itracke

Re: [web2py] Re: Thinking of building a bug tracker...

issue tracker I know of... I am looking at itracker now Thanks. :) On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:31 AM, stefaan wrote: > > > > I have noticed one other tracker in web2py, but I couldn't demo it. >> >> Have you seen these? > > http://code.google.com/p/web2py-issuetracker/ > http://www.i-track.org/ >

[web2py] Re: Thinking of building a bug tracker...

I have noticed one other tracker in web2py, but I couldn't demo it. > > Have you seen these? http://code.google.com/p/web2py-issuetracker/ http://www.i-track.org/

[web2py] Re: Thinking of building a bug tracker...

If you really want to save time, building a bug tracker is not the way to do it. But if you want to build one as an exercise, it's probably not a bad idea. It's hard to say how valuable the integration points would be. I'm usually pretty skeptical of stuff like that. There are probably ways to