Re: [web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

Thanks! merged. On Sunday, 19 August 2018 13:17:44 UTC-7, Nico Zanferrari wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've made a PR to update the Download page ( > https://github.com/web2py/web2py/pull/1976). Also, another PR to update > the first chapters of the book ( > https://github.com/web2py/web2py-book/pu

Re: [web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

Hi all, I've made a PR to update the Download page ( https://github.com/web2py/web2py/pull/1976). Also, another PR to update the first chapters of the book ( https://github.com/web2py/web2py-book/pull/392) - with a specific new paragraph 1.8 = "Running web2py with Python 2 vs. Python 3". Cheer

[web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

Thank you Massimo, As our tests, Apps created in Py-3 work in Py-2 and vice-versa - only we need to delete "Sessions", and "databases" folder files for migrations (proceed fake_migrations_all) and app works. Thanks for this wondefull Tool called Web2py. Regards Em domingo, 5 de agosto de 2

[web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

I agree. We should mention it. We should also say that "web2py runs with pyhton 3 BUT web2py apps created with python 2 require web2py running under python 2 and apps created using python 3 requires web2py running python 3. They cannot be mixed." To some this will break the plug and play if the

[web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

I try to, as this is the only py2 app I support, but these months I've been swamped with work. I'll resume testing in September. On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 9:06:46 AM UTC-5, Ari Lion BR Sp wrote: > > Hi Antonio Salazar, > > But if we do not test, we would not have how to fix BUGs. Maybe from tim

[web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

Hi Antonio Salazar, But if we do not test, we would not have how to fix BUGs. Maybe from times to times test your whole app on Python3 and report bugs... Thanks Ari - Brazil Em quinta-feira, 19 de julho de 2018 19:38:15 UTC-3, Antonio Salazar escreveu: > > Last April I downloaded the latest

[web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

Last April I downloaded the latest official stable release (2017-11-14) and adjusted all my code for Python 3. Unfortunately, two serious bugs in the streamer and scheduler made return to Python 2. Both bugs are fixed in Github, but I'm wary of trying it again until it's better tested on Python

[web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

That's awesome. Em quarta-feira, 18 de julho de 2018 23:37:29 UTC-3, Anthony escreveu: > > Do you have tested python3? >> > > Note, we do have passing tests, at least through Python 3.6: > https://travis-ci.org/web2py/web2py > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Document

[web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

> > Do you have tested python3? > Note, we do have passing tests, at least through Python 3.6: https://travis-ci.org/web2py/web2py -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issue

[web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

> > I can testify that perfomance improoves a lot. Whats lacking for official > support announcement? > I believe support is official -- we just need to make the updates to the site and documentation. -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.c

Re: [web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

El mar., 17 jul. 2018 a las 13:54, Ari Lion BR Sp () escribió: > Thanks Marcelo Huerta / Anthony. > > Do you have tested python3? > ​I don't have the infrastructure to perform testing best performed by the development team...​ > > I can testify that perfomance improoves a lot. Whats lacking fo

[web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

Thanks Marcelo Huerta / Anthony. Do you have tested python3? I can testify that perfomance improoves a lot. Whats lacking for official support announcement? Is there a list of issues for use under Python3? Thanks again, *Ari - Brazil* https://t.me/web2pybrasil (Brazillian Telegram Group) Em

[web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

It is mentioned here , but should be updated here and in the first three chapters of the book. Note, these updates can be made via pull requests to https://github.com/web2py/web2py (for the website, which is the "exa

Re: [web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

I have been using *web2py *on *Python3 *for almost a *year*, with *no apparent issues.* My script to install it with nginx (adaptation from original - please fork and contribute): https://github.com/arisobel/web2py_scripts/blob/master/setup-web2py-nginx-p3-uwsgi-ubuntu.sh Ask everyone to try it.

[web2py] Re: Why not to mention support to Python3 on the official sites main page?

El lunes, 16 de julio de 2018, 9:55:01 (UTC-3), Ari Lion BR Sp escribió: > > Hi, > > I wonder here why Python3 support is not mentioned at the official > web2py's website? > > I also wonder this. I think it might be because web2py hasn't been 100% in Python3? This is one of the issues which prev