[web2py] Re: lazy virtualfields

2010-09-09 Thread Niphlod
Perfect I think this can be added to the relevant section of the book, I didn't find anything about that, also on the internet... Thanks a lot, though. Niphlod On 8 Set, 03:08, mdipierro wrote: > Sorry for the lat reply. This is not a bug. This is a design issue and > tradeoff. > > In

[web2py] Re: lazy virtualfields

2010-09-07 Thread mdipierro
Sorry for the lat reply. This is not a bug. This is a design issue and tradeoff. In fact there is a single virtualfields instance, the one you create in: db.test.virtualfields.append(TestLazy()) and not one instance per record. There are two reasons for this: 1) allows cumulative virtualfield

[web2py] Re: lazy virtualfields

2010-08-26 Thread Niphlod
I see, the issue is really difficult to explain. I really want to squash this "bug", though. In addition on what I reported before, I managed to get eclipse debugging web2py and found that a default row is passed as default value to lazy_test_field() and surprise. surprise, it's actually the last