@ Richard - yes, this one : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle
@ Jason - yes. In a more traditional build & release infrastructure,
that kind of setup does make sense... However, this place isn't really
traditional, actually far from it ;) I'd be happy to show you how
web2py is used wit
It sounds like you could start the QT interface from web2py if you
wanted. :P But I think the best think would be to have two programs,
the Interface (Web, QT, Mobile app (nokia supports qt) etc...) and then
an application that communicates with that for the automation stuff. It
would have an
Peter's principles [?]
I should reread it...
Richard
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:53 PM, mart wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Its in-house (mostly all python) automation framework for
> builds&releases, and other process specific tasks (and acts a the
> interface between test and releas automation). Its all up
sorry, for the bad spelling... i usually dont re-read anything I type,
because then have to correct spelling, but this time I shoulda...
On Jan 21, 1:53 pm, mart wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Its in-house (mostly all python) automation framework for
> builds&releases, and other process specific tasks (and ac
Hey,
Its in-house (mostly all python) automation framework for
builds&releases, and other process specific tasks (and acts a the
interface between test and releas automation). Its all up and running
as it is, and is doing a great job. So, I;m doing some feature
development now that the foundation
So, there is lots of fun to had with web2py with pyQT. It just depends
on the end goal.
I embed web2py within an automation framework, which despite this and
a few other pieces, turns out to be pretty light on its feet (not a
huge footprint for users to download). So, doing this, web2py comes in
V
well, I think he didn't made it clear but I see many ways:
- create a component for web2py that instead of generating the html/
css/js source you use to see it in a website, it would generate the
GUI application (controllers+view) as well as linking it to a shared
model. This is a lot of work but
Hello,
It's not clear to me how you would combine PyQt (or PySide) with web2py
in the same application, it doesn't seem to make much sense to me.
Provided you could actually make this work, a PyQt UI embedded in a
web2py application would only be visible on the server (e.g. some google
data
wrong note!
I like it, I consider it the best way of making GUI's for many reasons
but I am beginner on it.
However, I think it may be interesting the creation of systems with
multiple interfaces.
In fact, I had the idea of the "web 6.0" :) as I called it, by
defining metadata threw the web that d
This is great to hear! I was looking at making a few pieces (with a
UI) that would have both web version and non-web version! So, I made a
note that "blackthorne" knows all about this when I get stuck! :)
Thanks for that!
Mart :)
On Jan 20, 3:46 pm, blackthorne wrote:
> yes, I fully recommend i
yes, I fully recommend it. i think it's the best way of developing gui
in a portable and native-respectful way. you also have Pyside.
Qt creator is great. you can use Qt designer with pyuic for
translation.
make your questions, I will try to answer even though it is fairly
offtopic.
On Jan 20, 8
11 matches
Mail list logo
