We had a long discussion about this several months ago, and as a result, the
license was changed from GPL (with commercial exception) to LGPL. I think
the idea was that LGPL should allow usage of the framework along with apps
and libraries of any license type while prohibiting any closed
source
>
> We are in an opensource shy team that is very concerned about licensing.
> I see that the Web2py license is LGPL3, but does Web2py carry any other
> license implications such as GPL, GPL2 in it's parts?
>
Given that there is contributed code included with the default package, and
they ha
We have been very careful. Every piece is LGPL or compatible and more
liberal.
Everything in web2py/gluon is LGPL and written by us. Code in
web2py/gluon/contrib/ comes from third parties and we have been careful to
include code that is LGPL or more liberal (BSD, MIT, etc.). Each module has
it
>
> I think frameworks are best under BSD/MIT
so you agree :)
the fact that it is written by a flash developer a few years ago doesn't
mean that this is not relevant information
prohibiting any closed source/commercial forks of web2py
DAL and template system can be used standalone
what if I wa
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Vasile Ermicioi wrote:
> DAL and template system can be used standalone
> what if I want to use them with bottle (MIT) or flask(BSD) and make a
> hybrid framework and distribute them (in commercial projects too)?
>
I guess you can create a comercial product, but
>
> I guess you can create a comercial product, but not a comercial framework.
what about an opensource framework :) e.g. ( bottle+dal+template+rocket) ?
anyway, I think another license change (to MIT) will be welcome
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Vasile Ermicioi wrote:
> what about an opensource framework :) e.g. ( bottle+dal+template+rocket) ?
Martin Mulone started a project for that
https://bitbucket.org/mulonemartin/web2tools/overview
--
--
Bruno Rocha
[ About me: http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno ]
great, as always, I thought and it is already done :)
so forks are allowed, or... ?
On Thursday, June 30, 2011 1:05:47 PM UTC-4, elffikk wrote:
>
> I guess you can create a comercial product, but not a comercial framework.
>
>
> what about an opensource framework :) e.g. ( bottle+dal+template+rocket) ?
>
I think you can do that, but I don't think you could make the entire
fr
On Thursday, June 30, 2011 12:52:06 PM UTC-4, elffikk wrote:
>
> I think frameworks are best under BSD/MIT
>
> so you agree :)
> the fact that it is written by a flash developer a few years ago doesn't
> mean that this is not relevant information
>
>
> prohibiting any closed source/commercial
Martin did something great, but I would include template too,
because I prefer web2py's template system
Yes, your license must say that you did so.
On Mar 8, 4:46 pm, kverdecia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I include the web2py template module in my desktop application
> without affecting the license of my application?
12 matches
Mail list logo
