Check permissions...
Richard
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Arve Fahlvik wrote:
> What was the solution? Seems like I have a similar problem.
>
> Arve
>
> On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 10:05:57 AM UTC+1, Johann Spies wrote:
>>
>> On 20 January 2016 at 16:35, Richard Vézina
>> wrote:
>>
>>
What was the solution? Seems like I have a similar problem.
Arve
On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 10:05:57 AM UTC+1, Johann Spies wrote:
>
> On 20 January 2016 at 16:35, Richard Vézina > wrote:
>
>>
>> Which user is regular "web" user under debian, www-data?
>>
>>
> Yes.
>
> Thanks it is worki
:)
Richard
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Johann Spies
wrote:
> On 20 January 2016 at 16:35, Richard Vézina
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Which user is regular "web" user under debian, www-data?
>>
>>
> Yes.
>
> Thanks it is working now.
>
> Regards
> Johann
>
> --
> Resources:
> - http://web2py.com
> -
On 20 January 2016 at 16:35, Richard Vézina
wrote:
>
> Which user is regular "web" user under debian, www-data?
>
>
Yes.
Thanks it is working now.
Regards
Johann
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https:
As Simone says, it seems clear that it come from permission...
Which user is regular "web" user under debian, www-data?
Even if it not the main issue, I would rather start debuging and make work
the 80 port before trying 443...
First link if I google the bind() error :
http://stackoverflow.com/q
On 26 August 2012 23:05, apps in tables wrote:
> Hi,
>
> where can i find tree example(file system) built by web2py ?
>
>
In the Web2py directory tree?
Regards
Johann
--
Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself,
my lips will praise you. (Psalm 63:3)
--
Hi,
where can i find tree example(file system) built by web2py ?
Regards,
Ashraf
On Monday, May 14, 2012 6:33:07 PM UTC+3, Ross Peoples wrote:
>
> I'm reading through the profile log, not that I'm an expert on profiling
> or anything, but I do have a few possible tips:
>
>1. Most of your c
We've been testing NginX for a while now, but we're still not using it on
production.
We've used a script from this group to install/configure nginx/web2py/uwsgi.
This script created a web2py configuration file on sites-available with
configurations for HTTP and HTTPS.
The one error message we get
Probably going to need a lot more information. Have you used Nginx before?
What does nginx.conf look like? Are you getting any error messages? Nginx
error log? Do you have to kill nginx, uwsgi or web2py to run again?
We have an application running under apache2 with 51 tables in
postgres and runs very well on apache, when put to run with the
postgres nginx a request timeout error appears and locks the
web-server. What might be happening? which the configuration to run
web2py + postgresql + nginx?
Ovi
OK so here is a little bit before and after I still have a lot of work to
do:
Before:
/
Sat May 12 15:39:07 2012profiler.log.tmp
85845 function calls (84497 primi
Yes, I have started moving everything from models to custom api modules
this weekend.
I am going to try to use most of the tips provided by everyone.
For the adviewer I will look to see what is calling 10 query's. However I
can not cache this query as the returned ads most be random for every use
If one has more than 10 tables, one should use conditional models and one
should move all state dependent settings into the controllers that need
them,
Massimo
On Monday, 14 May 2012 11:36:00 UTC-5, pbreit wrote:
>
> Aren't 135 table definitions going to be a problem in a high volume app?
> Ar
Aren't 135 table definitions going to be a problem in a high volume app?
Aren't many/most of those 85k-100k function calls going to
examining/parsing all those tabledefs?
On Monday, May 14, 2012 12:06:28 PM UTC-4, Ross Peoples wrote:
>
> The problem with doing it as a C module is that it would have to be
> compiled. I know that this is something that has been mentioned before but
> was shot down because web2py wouldn't be easily accessible, modified, etc,
> which
>
> If you want to use db.executesql() but remain portable, you can still have
>> the DAL generate the SQL for you by using the ._select() method:
>>
>> db.executesql(db(query)._select(...))
>>
>> Obviously in that case you don't get to hand optimize the SQL, but you
>> still get the speed advan
Yes right, it could not be anymore included into a single zip file that you
just unpack and good to go.
About PyPy, I read long time ago from someone that has make works web2py
with it that there was not that much speed improvement.
Richard
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Ross Peoples wrote:
This is cool : cache.ram.clear(key)
I didn't thought about it, I figure out that you trigger this in the
function that create new records for a given cached select... Good trade
off with caching and up to date select.
Thank for this one Ross.
Richard
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Ross Peop
The problem with doing it as a C module is that it would have to be
compiled. I know that this is something that has been mentioned before but
was shot down because web2py wouldn't be easily accessible, modified, etc,
which is the goal of web2py. Alternatively, maybe running web2oy in PyPy
envi
On Monday, May 14, 2012 11:50:06 AM UTC-4, Anthony wrote:
>
>
>>1. Your "adviewer/viewads" makes 10 calls to the database. Try to
>>optimize this either by writing fewer queries, creating a view, and/or
>> only
>>selecting fields that you need. Also make sure you get the criteria r
Hello,
I wonder if some of the speed problem that web2py has could be address by
translate some of the web2py module into C??
There is already many walk around for speed problem, but could there is
some major speed improvement by rewrite some of web2py fondation into C?
I am just curious about t
>
>
>1. Your "adviewer/viewads" makes 10 calls to the database. Try to
>optimize this either by writing fewer queries, creating a view, and/or
> only
>selecting fields that you need. Also make sure you get the criteria right
>so that you (ideally) don't have any extra, unneeded
I'm reading through the profile log, not that I'm an expert on profiling or
anything, but I do have a few possible tips:
1. Most of your calls are done in ~86 ms. That's pretty respectable.
2. Most of your time is spent on database calls, with compiling being
the second biggest time co
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 8:37:17 PM UTC-4, Bruce Wade wrote:
>
> How will compiling it effect things as we are actively developing and
> adding new features almost daily?
>
After you make a change, you can just do "Remove compiled" and then
re-compile. You can do it via the admin interface or the
How will compiling it effect things as we are actively developing and
adding new features almost daily?
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Anthony wrote:
> To cut define_table execution time you could try to put migrate=False,
>> fake_migrate=False, when you call the DAL since in production the
>>
>
> To cut define_table execution time you could try to put migrate=False,
> fake_migrate=False, when you call the DAL since in production the
> model does not change (usually) at runtime.
>
Yes, definitely turn off migrations -- you can do so for the entire
connection via:
db = DAL(..., mig
Youadworld is HUGE some tables even have 50 columns.
On May 13, 2012 2:59 PM, "pbreit" wrote:
> 135 tables to run YouAdWorld??
135 tables to run YouAdWorld??
The first numbers to look at are times those are what affect our
lives. The number of calls bother just the cpu ;-)
1. time to complete the action
2. cumulative time i.e. where most of the time affecting 1. is spent
3. percall time i.e. to find if there is a function that is really slow
1. is ar
Shouldn't be as I have deleted that default function.
On May 12, 2012 4:36 PM, "Bruno Rocha" wrote:
> Do you have images being seved by web2py using the default download
> function?
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Bruce Wade wrote:
>
>> Ok so I started it with the profile to be honest need
Do you have images being seved by web2py using the default download
function?
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Bruce Wade wrote:
> Ok so I started it with the profile to be honest need some guidance on how
> to read this report. But like the one call there is 582,237 function calls
> that looks
lol, yeah I guess that is my problem with being a C++ coder. But I also
seen that 90 tables were loaded with every request ;)
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Michele Comitini <
michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I keep saying it but nobody listens :-)
>
> USE THE PROFILER
>
> You wasting *your
I keep saying it but nobody listens :-)
USE THE PROFILER
You wasting *your* time trying to guess where the application is
wasting *its* time.
mic
2012/5/12 Anthony :
> On Saturday, May 12, 2012 12:06:28 PM UTC-4, Bruce Wade wrote:
>>
>> Yeah I am going through all my controllers right now to se
On Saturday, May 12, 2012 12:06:28 PM UTC-4, Bruce Wade wrote:
>
> Yeah I am going through all my controllers right now to see if I can use
> the folder solution. Which way would be faster? Folders or modules?
>
Well, a model file still has to be read each time it is needed, whereas a
module rem
OK so I am working on this technique what do you think?
API File: youadAPI.adviewer_api
from gluon import *
class AdViewerEngine:
class tables:
AdReports = 'adreports'
Ads = 'ads'
AdveiwerSettings = 'adviewer_settings'
Keywords = 'keywords'
AdKeyword = '
Yeah I am going through all my controllers right now to see if I can use
the folder solution. Which way would be faster? Folders or modules?
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Saturday, May 12, 2012 10:51:59 AM UTC-4, Bruce Wade wrote:
>>
>> I am starting to think the design lo
On Saturday, May 12, 2012 10:51:59 AM UTC-4, Bruce Wade wrote:
>
> I am starting to think the design loading everything in models with every
> request, all though makes for rapid development isn't a very good design.
> Maybe for common settings in witch case the folder shouldn't be called
> mode
I am starting to think the design loading everything in models with every
request, all though makes for rapid development isn't a very good design.
Maybe for common settings in witch case the folder shouldn't be called
models.
I need to go through my app completely and remove everything from model
> Connections = (pool_size) * (number of web2py processes)
>
> So if you have 10 threads and pool_size = 4
> 1 * 4 = 4 connections
>
> If you have 10 processes (each with 6 threads):
> 10 * 4 = 40 connections
>
> As you can see the number of processes is not a term of the computation.
> You must c
2012/5/11 Bruce Wade :
> Maybe in some places of the code but not everywhere. The problem is when
> there is a large load all 3 servers get very slow on every page. I think it
> is the DB layer as we have 90 tables in one database 45 in another. I am
> also using connection pooling which I think is
Maybe in some places of the code but not everywhere. The problem is when
there is a large load all 3 servers get very slow on every page. I think it
is the DB layer as we have 90 tables in one database 45 in another. I am
also using connection pooling which I think is causing problems. Because
the
Bruce,
Are you building dict with query for represent or other use?
Recently I solve speed problem I had by caching dict building query.
I never thought that building a dictionary could be that expensive in term
of cpu load.
Richard
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Bruce Wade wrote:
> Yes th
Yes there are a LOT of wait state on the web2py nodes and high CPU
I will try your suggestions.
Thanks,
Bruce
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Michele Comitini <
michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The high load on web2py nodes seems to point to code in web2py. If it
> were a problem with pos
The high load on web2py nodes seems to point to code in web2py. If it
were a problem with postgres you would have a high load on postgresql
and a lot of wait state and little CPU time resulting in little uptime
on web2py nodes but long page rendering times.
I suggest to try to convert some logic t
Web2py is on 3 different servers/nodes, postgresql is on it's own node with
8GB ram.
CPU is being used by uwsgi so web2py. The slowness I think is from DB
queries as when you load a page without the DB involved much it loads
quickly
The serving ads part is not a problem it is the other pages on t
Is the high load caused by web2py process or postgresql?
Is web2py on the same machine as postgresql?
Use top or htop to find which process uses the CPU. If it is web2py
*use* the profiler. If it postgres try to find the bad query and try
to improve it by using EXPLAIN.
Could be also the swapping
The verification email has been sent!
But I am using a feature that allows first login without registration, but
you will not be able to login again
I will include a captcha...
de rifar...@gmail.com para d...@dfgdfg.pl
data 19 de setembro de 2011 06:27 assunto Bem-vindo, confirme seu
e-mail
47 matches
Mail list logo
