We have 43 patches that have been reviewed and are waiting to land:
http://webblaze.org/pending-commit
If you're a committer, you can help drive that number to zero. Here's
what you can do:
1) If you have a patch on that list, please land it.
2) If you see a patch on the list that's ready to
Mark correctly points out that I meant:
http://webkit.org/pending-commit
(webblaze.org is my server for running experiments.)
Adam
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
We have 43 patches that have been reviewed and are waiting to land:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org
To: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 3:21 AM
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Calling all committers: The pending-commit list
isoverflowing
If you're a committer, you can help drive that number to zero.
I'm able to do it now. Thanks.
-Yong
- Original Message -
From: Eric Seidel esei...@google.com
To: Yong Li yong...@torchmobile.com
Cc: Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org; webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Calling all committers:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
2) If you see a patch on the list that's ready to land (almost all of
them), you can mark it commit-queue+ to have the commit bot land it.
When you do this, please be sure to watch the tree for regressions,
just like you
On Oct 16, 2009, at 7:07 PM, Evan Martin wrote:
When you select multiple lines of text in WebKit, the highlight paints
over whitespace on the right margin.
This is correct behavior for Mac, but not for Windows or Linux.
I would suggest making it be controlled by a Setting rather than
I agree. I would like to retain this mode of selection in Windows
Chrome at least. I think it's only ragged in most apps because people
don't take the time to make it look nice.
-Ben
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:57 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 16, 2009, at 7:07 PM, Evan Martin
FYI, this was filed some time ago:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3527
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21960
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ben Goodger b...@google.com wrote:
I agree. I would like to retain this mode of selection in Windows
Chrome at least. I
To me, it looks ugly to have a ragged edge if you can avoid it. Dave
did a great job making it look nice in WebKit. I don't have a strong
feeling on Linux so if people feel strongly there whatever. But on
Windows Chrome I want to retain the solid edge. Maybe there are ways
the solid edge can be
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:10 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
I can get how editing in text fields you might feel a desire to match the
platform (where ragged selection may be the convention), but once you get
into rich text selection (images, floats, tables, columns, etc.), there
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Ben Goodger b...@google.com wrote:
To me, it looks ugly to have a ragged edge if you can avoid it. Dave
did a great job making it look nice in WebKit. I don't have a strong
feeling on Linux so if people feel strongly there whatever. But on
Windows Chrome I want
On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:10 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
I can get how editing in text fields you might feel a desire to
match the platform (where ragged selection may be the convention),
but once you get into rich text selection
On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:10 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
I can get how editing in text fields you might feel a desire to
match the platform (where ragged selection may be the convention),
but once you get into rich text selection
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:21 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
I'm not quite sure what you mean. Do you just mean it looks visually
confusing, but when you copy/paste you get the right text? Or are you
saying that it's actually
On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:27 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:21 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
I'm not quite sure what you mean. Do you just mean it looks
visually confusing, but when you copy/paste you get the right
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
You aren't only selecting text on a page though. For example, copying can
be of all the HTML content. This includes tables, images, plugins, etc.
If you don't highlight that content, then you're lying about what gets
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
You aren't only selecting text on a page though. For example, copying can
be of all the HTML content. This includes tables, images, plugins, etc.
If
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I think there is a good use case for copying a selection of HTML from any
web page and pasting that into the rich text editor of a web mail program.
I agree, but that case does not degrade badly when you only copy the
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I think there is a good use case for copying a selection of HTML from any
web page and pasting that into the rich text editor of a web mail
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:45 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
The only time non-text should be copied is when it is part of a rich text
area. In that case copying rich content makes sense.
Ok, well we fundamentally disagree on this
On Oct 19, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
Note that within Chrome we put in ctrl-shift-v to paste as plain
text precisely because of issues like this. Most other programs
don't have that option though (and even in Chrome it's hard to
discover).
On Mac we call this Paste and
On Oct 19, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
Note that within Chrome we put in ctrl-shift-v to paste as plain
text precisely because of issues like this. Most other programs
don't have that option though (and even in Chrome it's hard to
discover).
I guess it isn't exactly what you
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I think there is a good use case for copying a selection of HTML from any
web page and pasting that into the rich text editor of a web mail
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Pam Greene p...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.comwrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I think there is a good use case for copying a selection of HTML from any
web
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Joe Mason j...@notcharles.ca wrote:
Perhaps the browser should have Copy text and Copy all objects
options (in which case either WebKit needs to support both modes, or
the browser would need to filter the copied data).
Yes, that could help. Filed
We're back down to 25 after Yong's epic cq+ing this morning. The
queue had a record 13 patch backlog for a while. Thank you Yong for
cleaning the pending-commit list!
Still 25 to go. All of which require manual attention from committers.
-eric
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Eric Seidel
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
The real issue is whether application shortcuts get precedence over DOM
event handlers, currently on mac the DOM event handlers get precedence (and
thus the ability to override/prevent application shortcuts) and on windows
WebKit, you are awesome. We're down to our usual 17 now.
Thanks everyone!
Adam
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
We're back down to 25 after Yong's epic cq+ing this morning. The
queue had a record 13 patch backlog for a while. Thank you Yong for
cleaning
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 18:03, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 19, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
I'm trying to clean up some inconsistencies with when keypress events
are dispatched.
WebKit's key event model is modeled to be compatible with Internet
Explorer and
Why are there 17 patches with review+ that never get landed?
This has bothered me in the past, but I wasn't sure if it was the same group of
patches or not.
Dave
On Mon, October 19, 2009 at 7:08:50 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
WebKit, you are awesome. We're down to our usual 17 now.
Thanks
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:39 PM, David Kilzer ddkil...@webkit.org wrote:
Why are there 17 patches with review+ that never get landed?
This has bothered me in the past, but I wasn't sure if it was the same group
of patches
31 matches
Mail list logo
