Re: [webkit-dev] The Care and Feeding of WebCore Modules

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Kentaro Hara wrote: > Thank you very much for the organization. Your suggestion sounds great to me. > > Just for clarification, I would like to confirm what action we should > take for each item from now: > > == Existing Modules == > > gamepad => KEEP > geolocatio

Re: [webkit-dev] The Care and Feeding of WebCore Modules

Thank you very much for the organization. Your suggestion sounds great to me. Just for clarification, I would like to confirm what action we should take for each item from now: == Existing Modules == gamepad => KEEP geolocation => KEEP indexeddb (work in progress) => KEEP intents => KEEP mediast

Re: [webkit-dev] The Care and Feeding of WebCore Modules

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > Here's an update of my lists based on the notes from you, Adam and others: > > == Existing Modules == > > gamepad > geolocation > indexeddb (work in progress) > intents > mediastream > vibration > websockets > > > == Likely Future Modu

Re: [webkit-dev] The Care and Feeding of WebCore Modules

Here's an update of my lists based on the notes from you, Adam and others: == Existing Modules == gamepad geolocation indexeddb (work in progress) intents mediastream vibration websockets == Likely Future Modules == filesystem notifications pagevisibility protocolhandler websql webaudio ==

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

We're back to the slaves overloading svn. The Apple slaves are blocked temporarily while everyone else catches up. Sorry for the inconvenience. -Bill ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:33 PM, William Siegrist wrote: > > On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:26 PM, William Siegrist wrote: > >> >> On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Mark Rowe wrote: >> >>> >>> On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe wrote: >

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:26 PM, William Siegrist wrote: > > On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Mark Rowe wrote: > >> >> On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe wrote: On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler wrote: If anyon

[webkit-dev] new: experimental support for 'virtual test suites' in new-run-webkit-tests

Hi all, I have recently landed support for 'virtual test suites' in new-run-webkit-tests (as the subject suggests ;) ). A virtual test suite tells NRWT to run all the tests in directory 'foo' with an additional set of command line arguments being passed to DRT, and to look for baselines in directo

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Mark Rowe wrote: > > On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe wrote: >>> >>> On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler wrote: >>> >>> build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5. >>> >>> Thanks for yo

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe wrote: >> >> On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler wrote: >> >> build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5. >> >> Thanks for your patience! >> >> >> For anyone following along at home, u

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe wrote: > > On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler wrote: > > build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5. > > Thanks for your patience! > > > For anyone following along at home, upgrading to Buildbot v0.8.5 alone > actually made build.webkit.

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler wrote: > build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5. > > Thanks for your patience! For anyone following along at home, upgrading to Buildbot v0.8.5 alone actually made build.webkit.org substantially slower. After profiling it for a while we

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

build.webkit.org should be back online now with 0.8.5. Thanks for your patience! Lucas On Feb 29, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Lucas Forschler wrote: > I'm currenlty upgrading build.webkit.org from 0.8.3 to 0.8.5. It should be > back online shortly. > Lucas > > On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Ryosuke Ni

Re: [webkit-dev] spinoff from webkit-patch -g discussion

Awesome thanks very much. =) Yeah, the way you proposed to deal with it seems better, now I think of it. ~Shawn On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Shawn Singh wrote: > Awesome thanks very much. =) > > Yeah, the way you proposed to deal with it seems better, now I think of it. > > ~Shawn

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

I'm currenlty upgrading build.webkit.org from 0.8.3 to 0.8.5. It should be back online shortly. Lucas On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Lucas Forschler > wrote: > I am looking into improving performance of build.webkit.org. After doing >

Re: [webkit-dev] spinoff from webkit-patch -g discussion

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Shawn Singh wrote: > Quote from the discussion: > >> >> that's why I said that having something like webkit-patch upload >> range_of_commits will be nice to have, as you wouldn't have to create a >> new branch and rebase several commits, just to upload a new patch

[webkit-dev] spinoff from webkit-patch -g discussion

Quote from the discussion: > that's why I said that having something like webkit-patch upload > range_of_commits will be nice to have, as you wouldn't have to create a > new branch and rebase several commits, just to upload a new patch to the > bz. > > You can do this with the current -g option

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Lucas Forschler wrote: > >> I am looking into improving performance of build.webkit.org. After >> doing some initial research I feel that buildbot isn't the most efficient >> in terms of processing a large n

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Lucas Forschler wrote: > I am looking into improving performance of build.webkit.org. After doing > some initial research I feel that buildbot isn't the most efficient in > terms of processing a large number of requests. I believe requests are > processed serial

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

Hi Lucas, Thank you very much for your answer! One change that was applied to Chromium's build bot console[1] recently was to cache the overview page for a minute. This may be relevant to the Apache caching layer you mentioned. If requests are really handled serially then updating to version 0.

[webkit-dev] Head-ups: massive TEXT rebaselining

Hi everyone, TL;DR: If you don't maintain a bot or look at render tree dumps, I guess this is not interesting to you. I will land https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75568 tomorrow to give enough time for people to react. This makes us lazily allocate layers when we get layout overflow. The u

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

Hi Peter, I am looking into improving performance of build.webkit.org. After doing some initial research I feel that buildbot isn't the most efficient in terms of processing a large number of requests. I believe requests are processed serially, and not in parallel. The buildbot documentation

Re: [webkit-dev] (no subject)

En 29/02/12 18:42, Ojan Vafai escribiu: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Sergio Villar Senin > > Do you know how to use git rebase -i? > > Konstantin, that's why I meant with "merge several commits in a single > one". You do not normally want to do that while you're developing a >

Re: [webkit-dev] -webkit-transform-origin-x,y CSS properties

On Feb 29, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Hans Muller wrote: > > Are the -webkit-transform-origin-x,y CSS properties on their way in our > out? The ugly little test below demonstrates that they're probably not > supported by Opera or Mozilla. They are not in the spec:

Re: [webkit-dev] (no subject)

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Sergio Villar Senin wrote: > En 29/02/12 09:33, Konstantin Tokarev escribiu: > > >> Although I normally use it for cherry-picking a commit to upload, I have > >> always missed the option to upload a bunch of commits as a single patch. > >> Basically, as you said,

[webkit-dev] -webkit-transform-origin-x,y CSS properties

Are the -webkit-transform-origin-x,y CSS properties on their way in our out? The ugly little test below demonstrates that they're probably not supported by Opera or Mozilla. CSSComputedStyleDeclaration::getPropertyCSSValue() in WebKit (explicitly) ignores them. Should they stay or should they g

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org is very sick

FYI, The build server seems to be acting up again. All build servers are either stuck starting or stopping queues with a long backlog building up. http://build.webkit.org/one_line_per_build is taking forever (upwards of a dozen seconds) to load. -Ash From:

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

Hi Bill, Would it be possible to get some more information on your/Lucas' plans on improving stability of the infrastructure? This was the third significant interruption within a week, and especially for us non-PST folks it's becoming quite inconvenient. Thanks, Peter On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 15

Re: [webkit-dev] trac.webkit.org is down

This should be fixed now. -Bill On Feb 29, 2012, at 5:40 AM, Ashod Nakashian wrote: > Update: trac.webkit.org was back up for a short while then died again. (Could > we the eastern-hemispherics be overloading it?) > Where previously it was not responding at all, now it's protesting... > Trace

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

This should be fixed now. -Bill On Feb 29, 2012, at 3:19 AM, David Barr wrote: >> Is it any trick to update my git-svn repo from svn? >> >> I set up my git svn repo about >> $http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKit : >> - git clone git://git.webkit.org/WebKit.git WebKit >> - git svn ini

Re: [webkit-dev] trac.webkit.org is down

Update: trac.webkit.org was back up for a short while then died again. (Could we the eastern-hemispherics be overloading it?) Where previously it was not responding at all, now it's protesting... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6

Re: [webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

> Is it any trick to update my git-svn repo from svn? > > I set up my git svn repo about > $http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKit : > - git clone git://git.webkit.org/WebKit.git WebKit > - git svn init --prefix=origin/ -T trunk > http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit > - git config --rep

[webkit-dev] SVN repository is down

Hi, http://svn.webkit.org is down. Could you please bring this up? Thanks, Ali ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

[webkit-dev] trac.webkit.org is down

Hi, As of ~20mins ago trac.webkit.org is down, webkit.org, bugs and build are OK. Don't know who to notify so I'm spamming webkit-dev, sorry. Who should be contacted in such cases? -Ash___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lis

[webkit-dev] git.webkit.org problem

Hi, git.webkit.org is behind svn.webkit.org again. :( r109205 is the latest svn commit, but r109202 in git. Unfortunately I can't commit to svn because this problem. Is it any trick to update my git-svn repo from svn? I set up my git svn repo about $http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKi

Re: [webkit-dev] (no subject)

En 29/02/12 09:33, Konstantin Tokarev escribiu: >> Although I normally use it for cherry-picking a commit to upload, I have >> always missed the option to upload a bunch of commits as a single patch. >> Basically, as you said, forcing people to merge several commits in a >> single one to upload a

Re: [webkit-dev] (no subject)

29.02.2012, 12:26, "Sergio Villar Senin" : > En 28/02/12 22:06, Dirk Pranke escribiu: > >>>  I'm beginning to think it probably makes sense to add a different >>>  commandline argument that works exactly like diff (e.g. takes an optional >>>  second value). --git-diff perhaps? >>  Based on the re

Re: [webkit-dev] (no subject)

En 28/02/12 22:06, Dirk Pranke escribiu: >> I'm beginning to think it probably makes sense to add a different >> commandline argument that works exactly like diff (e.g. takes an optional >> second value). --git-diff perhaps? >> > > Based on the responses on this thread, I agree with you. It looks

Re: [webkit-dev] (no subject)

En 28/02/12 04:46, Ryosuke Niwa escribiu: > Do people really use "git diff" that often? I don't use git much but > when I do I always get annoyed by the way "git diff" works because I > almost always want "git diff master". >From my own experience, when you're used to a git workflow, you almost ne