I believe most if not all of the ports have started using either
TestExpectations files or a combination of TestExpectations files
(except for the Apple Win port).
Can we explicitly switch to the TestExpectations files at this point
and drop support for Skipped files on the other ports (and perhap
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> Adam Barth wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>>
>>> What is the rationale for adding this property on the navigator object
>>>
>>> instead of the chrome object we also expose if your'e not expecting this
>>> pro
Adam Barth wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
What is the rationale for adding this property on the navigator object
instead of the chrome object we also expose if your'e not expecting this
property to be ever standarized?
Generally, we avoid implementing web visible f
On 07/06/2012, at 1:10 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Annie Sullivan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I wanted to let you know that I plan to add support for
>>> navigator.buildType (e.g., "nightly", "beta", "final") to WebKit.
On 07/06/2012, at 12:53 PM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Dean Jackson wrote:
>>
>> On 07/06/2012, at 12:05 PM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>> In many browsers in the past, it's been
>>> pretty easy to determine from "a" and "b" characters in the user agent
>>> of man
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Annie Sullivan
> wrote:
>>
>> I wanted to let you know that I plan to add support for
>> navigator.buildType (e.g., "nightly", "beta", "final") to WebKit. This
>> feature isn't on the standards track (but neithe
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
>
> FAIL was supposed to have been removed long ago in favor of
> TEXT/IMAGE/IMAGE+TEXT as necessary as Peter suggests, but I never got
> around to it :) I agree with his reasoning, and have not been
> convinced that not having to be specific abo
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
> I wanted to let you know that I plan to add support for
> navigator.buildType (e.g., "nightly", "beta", "final") to WebKit. This
> feature isn't on the standards track (but neither are a bunch of other
> similar properties on Navigator). This
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>
>> Now that everyone knows the problem, I propose to rename FAIL to DIFF.
>>
>> FAIL should mean that the test fails, not that it fails with image, text,
>> or image and text failures.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Dean Jackson wrote:
>> On 07/06/2012, at 12:05 PM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
>>> In many browsers in the past, it's been
>>> pretty easy to determine from "a" and "b" characters in the user agent
>>> of many bro
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Dean Jackson wrote:
>
> On 07/06/2012, at 12:05 PM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
>
>> In many browsers in the past, it's been
>> pretty easy to determine from "a" and "b" characters in the user agent
>> of many browsers which builds are "alpha" and "beta", and I haven't
>
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> Not if the test was padding. I'm talking about the case where you're
>> modifying WebCore and know that some tests are going to need rebaselines.
>> People have advised in the past th
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Not if the test was padding. I'm talking about the case where you're
> modifying WebCore and know that some tests are going to need rebaselines.
> People have advised in the past that patch authors add failing test
> expectations to TestExpec
On 07/06/2012, at 12:05 PM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
> In many browsers in the past, it's been
> pretty easy to determine from "a" and "b" characters in the user agent
> of many browsers which builds are "alpha" and "beta", and I haven't
> heard of bugs caused specifically by checking for build typ
The reason for this (which is debatable) is that CRASH and TIMEOUT are
deemed to be more serious and shouldn't be suppressed as lightly.
MISSING, on the other hand, just indicates that there's something
wrong (tests should never have missing results for very long).
-- Dirk
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> > I don't think DIFF is any better. It sounds like it means the output
>> is "different than what we wanted", thus it effectively means "didn't
>> pass", and one would expect it to m
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Dean Jackson wrote:
>
> On 07/06/2012, at 10:07 AM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Oops, forgot to reply-all.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
Our past experience with this so
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>
> 07.06.2012, 21:07, "Annie Sullivan" :
>> Oops, forgot to reply-all.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
Our past experience with this sort of
07.06.2012, 21:07, "Annie Sullivan" :
> Oops, forgot to reply-all.
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
>>> Our past experience with this sort of thing at Apple is that it led to
>>> bugs we didn’t find until after
On 07/06/2012, at 10:07 AM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
> Oops, forgot to reply-all.
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
>>>
>>> Our past experience with this sort of thing at Apple is that it led to bugs
>>> we didn’t fi
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> > I don't think DIFF is any better. It sounds like it means the output is
> "different than what we wanted", thus it effectively means "didn't pass",
> and one would expect it to match MISSING/CRASH/TIMEOUT as much as one would
> expect FAIL
Oops, forgot to reply-all.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Annie Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
>>
>> Our past experience with this sort of thing at Apple is that it led to bugs
>> we didn’t find until after we shipped “final” software because they did not
Done.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Simon Pena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request EditBugs permissions to be added to my
> bugs.webkit.org account (spena at igalia.com)
>
> I'm not a committer, but I have worked on several patches already,
> mainly for the GTK port.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
Hi,
I'd like to request EditBugs permissions to be added to my
bugs.webkit.org account (spena at igalia.com)
I'm not a committer, but I have worked on several patches already,
mainly for the GTK port.
Thanks in advance,
--
Simon Pena
Igalia - Free Software Engineering
signature.asc
Descrip
24 matches
Mail list logo
