Hi,
I just tested with a temporary patch that removed most of the contents of
WebKit2.def.in (https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=177603). ews-win
still reported one unresolved external just as for the previous patches (
http://queues.webkit.org/results/15153238). So I suspect that WebKit2.d
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Xianzhu Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Xianzhu Wang wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=177534, I added the symbol
>> into Source/WebKit2/WebKit2.def.in trying to resolve the "unresolved
>> external" error of the previou
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Xianzhu Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=177534, I added the symbol
> into Source/WebKit2/WebKit2.def.in trying to resolve the "unresolved
> external" error of the previous patch (
> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=177506)
Both the commit hashes mentioned in the log appear to be real hashes
from today, about ten revisions apart. I'm not enough of a git expert
to understand what's going on.
Adam
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible if http://git.chromium.org/external/W
Hi,
In https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=177534, I added the symbol
into Source/WebKit2/WebKit2.def.in trying to resolve the "unresolved
external" error of the previous patch (
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=177506), but the error still
occurred. I have read https://trac.webkit.
Hi,
Is it possible if http://git.chromium.org/external/Webkit
is broken? Or somebody pushed non fast forward commits?
Maybe a manual kick can help:
git reset --hard HEAD~1000
git clean -dxf
git pull
These lines always helped me if something went wrong on my git repository.
Ossy
Eric Seidel í
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Rick Byers wrote:
>>
>> >> The premise of the specification is that using mouse event and touch
>> >> events
>> >> interchangeably is needed. In reality, nobody was really asking for
>> >> that
>> >> becaus
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> An example of the git failures can be found here:
> http://queues.webkit.org/results/15120956
>
> (For any with git-knowledge who might know what's wrong.)
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> There's some problem with the
An example of the git failures can be found here:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/15120956
(For any with git-knowledge who might know what's wrong.)
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> There's some problem with the commit-queue failing with some git
> error. I'm taking it offl
There's some problem with the commit-queue failing with some git
error. I'm taking it offline for the rest of the day. Hopefully I'll
figure it out tonight.
Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/li
On Tuesday 04 December 2012, Adam Barth wrote:
> There's been a somewhat fragmented discussion across webkit-dev and
> various bugs about how we ought to approach multiprocess networking in
> WebKit. In an attempt to organize my thoughts, I wrote up a short
> design document that compares various
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Rick Byers wrote:
> >> The premise of the specification is that using mouse event and touch
> events
> >> interchangeably is needed. In reality, nobody was really asking for that
> >> because it is a terrible idea. You can already easily unify pen, touch
> and
> >
>> The premise of the specification is that using mouse event and touch
events
>> interchangeably is needed. In reality, nobody was really asking for that
>> because it is a terrible idea. You can already easily unify pen, touch
and
>> mouse by writing very little JavaScript, but it is only useful
On 11/30/12 23:59 , Hajime Morrita wrote:
It looks github supports mirroring by pulling a repo from official location.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11370239/creating-an-official-github-mirror
Ah, didn't know they provided that service, nice. I'm a bit worried
about the sync delay though,
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>> Why does this feature have a flag at all? background-position with up to 4
>> arguments is specified with CSS3 background and
15 matches
Mail list logo
