Thanks for the detailed response! I should be clear that I don’t have a strong
opinion for or against flattened headers, I’m just interested in ironing out a
perceived inconsistency.
> On Feb 3, 2022, at 15:31, Darin Adler wrote:
>
> Long ago, I originally created the forwarding headers to
> On Feb 3, 2022, at 5:16 PM, Elliott Williams wrote:
>
> If what you’ve experienced is unique to WTF, I’d be suspicious of the
> non-standard approach we’ve taken to copying WTF’s headers I mentioned above.
Great news. I hope this plan works out.
— Darin
Long ago, I originally created the forwarding headers to bridge the gap between
framework-style includes that those of us at Apple wanted to do, where headers
are flattened and you write #include , and
Unix-style installed libraries, where things are not flattened. I wanted us to
be able to
> On Feb 1, 2022, at 22:12, Tim Horton wrote:
>
> Question: If they're flattened in the SDK, and not flattened in the source
> tree, which include path do we use when including a WTF header in e.g.
> WebCore?
>
> Right now you say `#include `. In your world, would you
> say `#include `?
4 matches
Mail list logo
