reflected there yet.
>
> Lucas
>
>> On Jun 20, 2016, at 10:26 AM, Lucas Forschler <lforsch...@apple.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up. I’m starting an investigation now.
>> Lucas
>>
>>> On Jun 20, 2016, at 2:05 AM, Adam Bergkvist <adam
Hi
Git access to the repo seem to be stuck at
705033b054017f33b94adacc3b5e7747aebb45ef (June 18)?
The unofficial github mirror has the same status [1].
/Adam
[1] https://github.com/WebKit/webkit/commits/master
___
webkit-dev mailing list
On 17/02/15 10:28, Adam Bergkvist wrote:
On 15/12/14 19:59, Andreas Kling wrote:
PS. Once the kinks are ironed out, I’ll also be updating the RefPtr
documentation on webkit.org.
Any progress on this particular part?
Bump.
/Adam
___
webkit-dev
Hi
Perhaps I should have posted this to the webkit-meeting list, but it
seems pretty dead.
Anyways.. does anyone have any notes or slides from the Network Cache
session that they would like to share? I missed that session at the meeting.
Antti or Chris?
BR
Adam
On 15/12/14 19:59, Andreas Kling wrote:
PS. Once the kinks are ironed out, I’ll also be updating the RefPtr
documentation on webkit.org.
Any progress on this particular part?
/Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Hi Benjamin
Thanks for you feedback. Please see answers inline.
On 28/01/15 20:14, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
Getting WebRTC working on WebKitGTK sounds awesome.
I am a little concerned with the use of an abstraction layer as a
backend. I am afraid this could lead to weird abstractions.
On 11/10/2011 09:32 AM, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
2011/11/10 Victor LIrtj...@hotmail.com:
Hi，
Does the webkit implements the chapter Video conferencing and peer-to-peer
communication now?
if it doesn't , is there any plan to support it?
There are people working on it:
I want to inform people on this list that we have been doing some early
implementation work of the video conferencing and peer-to-peer communication
chapter in the HTML spec
(http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/dnd.html#video-conferencing-and-peer-to-peer-communication).
Hi,
On 2011-02-28 19:01, Leandro Graciá Gil wrote:
I'm glad we agree on the importance of allowing the user to revoke
device access. However we think that this point is important at the
design level rather than the implementation level. If access revoking
is introduced, then the concept of
type=file for devices,
whereas Leandro's device is a device connection management facility.
(Leandro, correct me if I'm wrong here)
BR
Adam Bergkvist
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi
Hi,
On 2011-02-15 17:50, Leandro Graciá Gil wrote:
Yes, the platform independent code in the device element will determine
if a selection has been made, or altered, in the list of available
devices
Provided by the platform. Before passing it to the device element, the
Hi,
On 2011-02-09 22:10, Leandro Graciá Gil wrote:
So, does that mean that a WebCore platform-independent code is going
to determine if a new device handler should be created? I think that
some UAs may like to, for example, keep a track of trusted pages for
specific types of devices to
Hi,
On 2011-02-04 19:21, Leandro Graciá Gil wrote:
This is good news! Especially for the situations where WebCore can't
directly access the hardware. One existing case of this we should keep
in mind are the sandboxed environments, where both the probing and the
connections must be
Hi,
Leandro Graciá Gil wrote:
The approach proposed in https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47264
brings the device probing and selection to the WebCore level. It does
so by first creating a list of available devices using an interface to
a platform-dependent client and then it passes
14 matches
Mail list logo
