Le 10 déc. 2012 09:24, "Alexis Menard" a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> >>
> >> On Dec 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Benjamin Poulain
wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Dirk Schulze
wrote:
> >>>
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>>> Why does this feature have a flag at all? background-position wit
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>> Why does this feature have a flag at all? background-position with up to 4
>> arguments is specified with CSS3 background and
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>> Depends on the future. But for such a small patch, a new flag seems to be
>> overdone. I looked into the patch, and adding the flag caused more code,
>> then the actual feature (even if the computed style is missing). I believe
>> we sh
On Dec 3, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Alexis Menard wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2012 6:21 PM, "Dirk Schulze" wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Dec 3, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> > > Depends on the future. But for such a small patch, a new fla
On Dec 3, 2012 6:21 PM, "Dirk Schulze" wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Dirk Schulze
wrote:
> > Depends on the future. But for such a small patch, a new flag seems to
be overdone. I looked into the patch, and adding the flag
On Dec 3, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> Depends on the future. But for such a small patch, a new flag seems to be
> overdone. I looked into the patch, and adding the flag caused more code, then
> the actual feature (even if
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> Depends on the future. But for such a small patch, a new flag seems to be
> overdone. I looked into the patch, and adding the flag caused more code,
> then the actual feature (even if the computed style is missing). I believe
> we should remo
On Dec 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> Why does this feature have a flag at all? background-position with up to 4
> arguments is specified with CSS3 background and borders. There are three
> major implementations with this
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> Why does this feature have a flag at all? background-position with up to 4
> arguments is specified with CSS3 background and borders. There are three
> major implementations with this feature. So we are just catching up. If the
> future work
On Dec 3, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 4:51 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
>
>> I plan to enable it by default on Qt and EFL ports this week. If
>> somebody wants me to enable it on their ports please tell me, I'll be
>> happy to do it.
>
> I think it's preferable to en
On Dec 3, 2012, at 4:51 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
> I plan to enable it by default on Qt and EFL ports this week. If
> somebody wants me to enable it on their ports please tell me, I'll be
> happy to do it.
I think it's preferable to enable for all ports if you think it's ready. In
general, featu
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 6:12 AM, "Alexis Menard" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 3, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
>>>
On Dec 3, 2012, at 6:12 AM, "Alexis Menard" wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 3, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
On Dec 3, 2012, at 4:51 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 3, 2012, at 4:51 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
>>>
Hi everyone,
I wanted to let you know that I have added
On Dec 3, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 3, 2012, at 4:51 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I wanted to let you know that I have added the new CSS3
>>> background-position offsets support to WebKi
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 4:51 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I wanted to let you know that I have added the new CSS3
>> background-position offsets support to WebKit.
>>
>> This support is behind the ENABLE_CSS3_BACKGROUND featu
On Dec 3, 2012, at 4:51 AM, Alexis Menard wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I wanted to let you know that I have added the new CSS3
> background-position offsets support to WebKit.
>
> This support is behind the ENABLE_CSS3_BACKGROUND feature define and
> it's disabled by default on all ports. I took
Hi everyone,
I wanted to let you know that I have added the new CSS3
background-position offsets support to WebKit.
This support is behind the ENABLE_CSS3_BACKGROUND feature define and
it's disabled by default on all ports. I took the conservative
approach despite it's a cool feature.
Long story
19 matches
Mail list logo
